Work overview

Section 18 of 37

PROBIOTIC–MICROBIOTA INTERACTIONS IN SUPPORTING IMMUNITY

Mechanistic insights into probiotic modulation of the gut–immune axis and their role as sustainable antibiotic alternatives in poultry production: An integrative review

Andreas Berny Yulianto, Aswin Rafif Khairullah, Widya Paramita Lokapirnasari, Mohammad Anam Al-Arif, Zulfi Nur Amrina Rosyada, Emy Koestanti Sabdoningrum, Bodhi Agustono, Mirni Lamid, Kartika Purnamasari, Bima Putra Pratama, Riza Zainuddin Ahmad, Wasito Wasito, Saifur Rehman, and Muhammad Aviv Firdaus · 2026

Contents

Section 18 of 37

  1. 01INTRODUCTION
  2. 02REVIEW METHODOLOGY
  3. 03BASIC CONCEPTS OF PROBIOTICS IN POULTRY
  4. 04DEFINITION OF PROBIOTICS
  5. 05TYPES AND SOURCES OF PROBIOTICS FOR POULTRY
  6. 06STRAIN-SPECIFIC EFFECTS AND QUANTITATIVE EVIDENCE
  7. 07GENERAL MECHANISMS OF PROBIOTICS IN THE DIGESTIVE TRACT
  8. 08IMMUNE SYSTEM IN POULTRY
  9. 09MUCOSAL IMMUNITY (GALT)
  10. 10INNATE IMMUNITY
  11. 11ADAPTIVE IMMUNITY
  12. 12GUT–IMMUNE AXIS RELATIONSHIP IN POULTRY
  13. 13THE EFFECT OF PROBIOTICS ON POULTRY IMMUNITY
  14. 14PROBIOTICS IN INCREASING INNATE IMMUNITY
  15. 15PROBIOTICS AND ADAPTIVE IMMUNITY
  16. 16EFFECTS ON MAJOR IMMUNE ORGANS
  17. 17PROBIOTICS IN REDUCING STRESS AND INFLAMMATION
  18. 18PROBIOTIC–MICROBIOTA INTERACTIONS IN SUPPORTING IMMUNITY
  19. 19THE EFFECT OF PROBIOTICS ON DISEASE RESISTANCE IN POULTRY
  20. 20FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE THE SUCCESS OF PROBIOTICS
  21. 21DOSAGE AND DURATION OF ADMINISTRATION
  22. 22DOSAGE FORM
  23. 23STABILITY AND RESISTANCE TO PH AND TEMPERATURE
  24. 24COMBINATION WITH PREBIOTICS (SYNBIOTICS)
  25. 25BACTERIAL STRAINS USED
  26. 26IN OVO AND EARLY-LIFE PROBIOTIC ADMINISTRATION
  27. 27CHALLENGES AND LIMITATIONS OF PROBIOTIC USE
  28. 28IMPLICATIONS FOR THE POULTRY INDUSTRY
  29. 29MARKET TRENDS AND REGIONAL ADOPTION PATTERNS
  30. 30SHORT-TERM APPLICABLE STRATEGIES FOR INDUSTRY IMPLEMENTATION
  31. 31ILLUSTRATIVE COMMERCIAL CASE EXAMPLES
  32. 32LONG-TERM RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT GOALS
  33. 33EMERGING ANALYTICAL APPROACHES
  34. 34FURTHER RESEARCH DIRECTIONS
  35. 35CONCLUSION
  36. 36GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE DECLARATION
  37. 37AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS
Text size
Work overview

Section 18 of 37

PROBIOTIC–MICROBIOTA INTERACTIONS IN SUPPORTING IMMUNITY

Andreas Berny Yulianto, Aswin Rafif Khairullah, Widya Paramita Lokapirnasari, Mohammad Anam Al-Arif, Zulfi Nur Amrina Rosyada, Emy Koestanti Sabdoningrum, Bodhi Agustono, Mirni Lamid, Kartika Purnamasari, Bima Putra Pratama, Riza Zainuddin Ahmad, Wasito Wasito, Saifur Rehman, and Muhammad Aviv Firdaus · about 3 minutes

The gut microbiota of poultry plays a crucial role in maintaining immune homeostasis and gastrointestinal health. Microbiota imbalance (dysbiosis), which can occur due to stress, infection, or antibiotic use, is often associated with increased pathogen colonization and a decreased immune response [187]. Probiotic supplemen-tation helps modify the microbiota and restore balance, supporting innate and adaptive immune function [188].

It should be emphasized that microbiota modulation does not always translate directly into measurable immune enhancement. Some studies demonstrate significant shifts in microbial composition without parallel increases in antibody titers or cytokine responses, indicating that microbial changes alone are insufficient predictors of functional immunity [189, 190].

Recent advances in multi-omics technologies, including 16S rRNA gene sequencing, shotgun metagenomics, metabolomics, and transcriptomics, have provided deeper mechanistic insights into probiotic–microbiota–host interactions [191]. High-throughput sequencing analyses frequently report increases in alpha diversity indices (e.g., Shannon and Chao1) following probiotic supplementation, although the magnitude and consistency of these changes vary among strains and production environments [192]. Beta-diversity analyses often reveal distinct clustering of treated versus control groups, suggesting measurable shifts in microbial community structure [193].

One of the primary mechanisms of action of probiotics is to restore the composition of the gut microbiota [194]. Probiotics can increase the number of beneficial bacteria, such as Lactobacillus spp. and Bifidobacterium spp., which play a role in producing bioactive metabolites, SCFAs, and antimicrobial peptides. These metabolites not only inhibit the growth of pathogens but also interact with epithelial cells and GALT to strengthen the integrity of the mucosal barrier and stimulate immune cell activity [195].

Metabolomic profiling has further linked probiotic-induced microbiota shifts to increased production of SCFAs, particularly acetate, propionate, and butyrate. SCFAs serve not only as energy substrates for enterocytes but also as signaling molecules that regulate tight junction protein expression, mucin production, and anti-inflammatory pathways [196]. Integrative analyses using multivariable association models (e.g., MaAsLin2) have identified significant associations between specific bacterial taxa and host immune markers, including correlations between butyrate-producing taxa and increased mucosal IgA levels or anti-inflammatory cytokine expression [197].

In addition to increasing the number of beneficial bacteria, probiotics also help reduce the population of pathogens such as Salmonella spp., E_.__ coli_, and Clostridium perfringens. This occurs through competition for space and nutrients (competitive exclusion), the production of antimicrobial compounds such as organic acids and bacteriocins, and an enhanced mucosal immune response that limits pathogen colonization [198]. Thus, probiotics function as mediators of microbial ecology, maintaining a balance between commensal and pathogenic microbiota. However, competitive exclusion effects are strain-specific, and not all probiotic formulations consistently reduce pathogen load in vivo. Variability in colonization ability and farm hygiene conditions further complicates the establishment of a definitive strain hierarchy [199].

At the host molecular level, transcriptomic studies demonstrate that probiotic supplementation can modulate key immune and stress-related pathways, including suppression of NF-κB activation under heat or pathogenic stress conditions, upregulation of tight junction–related genes (e.g., occludin, claudins), and modulation of cytokine gene expression (e.g., IFN-γ, IL-10, and IL-1β) [200]. Emerging evidence also suggests potential involvement in T regulatory (Treg) cell differentiation and epigenetic modulation through histone acetylation pathways influenced by SCFAs, although these mechanisms require further validation in poultry models [201].

The synergistic interaction among probiotics, the microbiota, and the immune system contributes to increased resistance to infection, strengthened mucosal immune response, and enhanced vaccine effectiveness and overall gastrointestinal health. Therefore, modulating the microbiota with probiotics is a crucial strategy in modern poultry production to naturally and sustainably improve performance, health, and pathogen resistance [202]. As illustrated in Figure 3[191–200], the gut–immune axis in poultry highlights the bidirectional interaction between gut microbiota, the intestinal epithelial barrier, and GALT, where microbial metabolites modulate immune responses while immune signaling maintains epithelial integrity and microbial balance.

Figure 3: Gut–immune axis in poultry showing the bidirectional interaction between gut microbiota, intestinal epithelial barrier, and gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT). This schematic illustration was conceptually developed based on published evidence [191–200] and generated using artificial intelligence tools (ChatGPT 5.2), then subsequently modified by the authors.

Figure 3: Gut–immune axis in poultry showing the bidirectional interaction between gut microbiota, intestinal epithelial barrier, and gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT). This schematic illustration was conceptually developed based on published evidence [191–200] and generated using artificial intelligence tools (ChatGPT 5.2), then subsequently modified by the authors.