Work overview

Section 16 of 37

EFFECTS ON MAJOR IMMUNE ORGANS

Mechanistic insights into probiotic modulation of the gut–immune axis and their role as sustainable antibiotic alternatives in poultry production: An integrative review

Andreas Berny Yulianto, Aswin Rafif Khairullah, Widya Paramita Lokapirnasari, Mohammad Anam Al-Arif, Zulfi Nur Amrina Rosyada, Emy Koestanti Sabdoningrum, Bodhi Agustono, Mirni Lamid, Kartika Purnamasari, Bima Putra Pratama, Riza Zainuddin Ahmad, Wasito Wasito, Saifur Rehman, and Muhammad Aviv Firdaus · 2026

Contents

Section 16 of 37

  1. 01INTRODUCTION
  2. 02REVIEW METHODOLOGY
  3. 03BASIC CONCEPTS OF PROBIOTICS IN POULTRY
  4. 04DEFINITION OF PROBIOTICS
  5. 05TYPES AND SOURCES OF PROBIOTICS FOR POULTRY
  6. 06STRAIN-SPECIFIC EFFECTS AND QUANTITATIVE EVIDENCE
  7. 07GENERAL MECHANISMS OF PROBIOTICS IN THE DIGESTIVE TRACT
  8. 08IMMUNE SYSTEM IN POULTRY
  9. 09MUCOSAL IMMUNITY (GALT)
  10. 10INNATE IMMUNITY
  11. 11ADAPTIVE IMMUNITY
  12. 12GUT–IMMUNE AXIS RELATIONSHIP IN POULTRY
  13. 13THE EFFECT OF PROBIOTICS ON POULTRY IMMUNITY
  14. 14PROBIOTICS IN INCREASING INNATE IMMUNITY
  15. 15PROBIOTICS AND ADAPTIVE IMMUNITY
  16. 16EFFECTS ON MAJOR IMMUNE ORGANS
  17. 17PROBIOTICS IN REDUCING STRESS AND INFLAMMATION
  18. 18PROBIOTIC–MICROBIOTA INTERACTIONS IN SUPPORTING IMMUNITY
  19. 19THE EFFECT OF PROBIOTICS ON DISEASE RESISTANCE IN POULTRY
  20. 20FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE THE SUCCESS OF PROBIOTICS
  21. 21DOSAGE AND DURATION OF ADMINISTRATION
  22. 22DOSAGE FORM
  23. 23STABILITY AND RESISTANCE TO PH AND TEMPERATURE
  24. 24COMBINATION WITH PREBIOTICS (SYNBIOTICS)
  25. 25BACTERIAL STRAINS USED
  26. 26IN OVO AND EARLY-LIFE PROBIOTIC ADMINISTRATION
  27. 27CHALLENGES AND LIMITATIONS OF PROBIOTIC USE
  28. 28IMPLICATIONS FOR THE POULTRY INDUSTRY
  29. 29MARKET TRENDS AND REGIONAL ADOPTION PATTERNS
  30. 30SHORT-TERM APPLICABLE STRATEGIES FOR INDUSTRY IMPLEMENTATION
  31. 31ILLUSTRATIVE COMMERCIAL CASE EXAMPLES
  32. 32LONG-TERM RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT GOALS
  33. 33EMERGING ANALYTICAL APPROACHES
  34. 34FURTHER RESEARCH DIRECTIONS
  35. 35CONCLUSION
  36. 36GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE DECLARATION
  37. 37AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS
Text size
Work overview

Section 16 of 37

EFFECTS ON MAJOR IMMUNE ORGANS

Andreas Berny Yulianto, Aswin Rafif Khairullah, Widya Paramita Lokapirnasari, Mohammad Anam Al-Arif, Zulfi Nur Amrina Rosyada, Emy Koestanti Sabdoningrum, Bodhi Agustono, Mirni Lamid, Kartika Purnamasari, Bima Putra Pratama, Riza Zainuddin Ahmad, Wasito Wasito, Saifur Rehman, and Muhammad Aviv Firdaus · about 2 minutes

Primary and secondary lymphoid organs in birds, such as the bursa of Fabricius, thymus, and spleen, play a crucial role in the formation and maturation of the immune system [167]. The bursa of Fabricius is a typical avian organ that serves as the site of B cell differentiation and maturation, while the thymus is responsible for the development of T lymphocytes [168]. The spleen, as a secondary lymphoid organ, plays a role in monitoring blood circulation, activating immune cells, and producing systemic antibodies [169].

Probiotic supplementation has been shown to influence the morphological development and relative weight of major lymphoid organs in poultry [170]. While some broiler trials report increased relative bursa or spleen weight following supplementation, others show no significant differences compared with controls [171]. Moreover, organ enlargement has not consistently correlated with improved antibody titers or enhanced protection following pathogen challenge. Studies have shown that administering probiotics, such as Lactobacillus spp., Bifidobacterium spp., and Bacillus spp., can increase the relative weight index of the bursa, thymus, and spleen, reflecting stimulation of immune cell proliferation and lymphoid tissue maturation [172]. This increase in relative weight is generally associated with increased lymphocyte counts and enlarged lymphoid follicles, indicating more immunologically active organs [173].

However, enlargement of lymphoid organs does not necessarily equate to improved immune competence. Increased organ weight may reflect transient immune activation, physiological adaptation, or even inflammatory responses rather than enhanced protective immunity [174]. Therefore, morphological enlargement should be interpreted alongside functional indicators, including antibody titers, cytokine profiles, pathogen challenge outcomes, and overall health performance, to accurately assess immunological benefits [175].

In addition to quantitative effects, probiotics also affect the histological structure of lymphoid organs [176]. The bursa of Fabricius showed increased lymphoid follicle diameter, cortical thickening, and a higher number of B cells, while the thymus experienced thymocyte proliferation and an increased cortex-to-medulla ratio [177]. In the spleen, probiotic supplementation increased lymphoid cell density in the white pulp and strengthened interactions between B and T cells [178]. These histological changes indicate that probiotics not only affect organ size but also enhance the functional ability of lymphoid organs to respond to antigens [179]. Nevertheless, sustained or excessive enlargement without corresponding improvements in immune efficiency may indicate immune overstimulation or increased metabolic burden, underscoring the need for balanced immune modulation rather than maximal organ growth.