Work overview

Section 11 of 37

ADAPTIVE IMMUNITY

Mechanistic insights into probiotic modulation of the gut–immune axis and their role as sustainable antibiotic alternatives in poultry production: An integrative review

Andreas Berny Yulianto, Aswin Rafif Khairullah, Widya Paramita Lokapirnasari, Mohammad Anam Al-Arif, Zulfi Nur Amrina Rosyada, Emy Koestanti Sabdoningrum, Bodhi Agustono, Mirni Lamid, Kartika Purnamasari, Bima Putra Pratama, Riza Zainuddin Ahmad, Wasito Wasito, Saifur Rehman, and Muhammad Aviv Firdaus · 2026

Contents

Section 11 of 37

  1. 01INTRODUCTION
  2. 02REVIEW METHODOLOGY
  3. 03BASIC CONCEPTS OF PROBIOTICS IN POULTRY
  4. 04DEFINITION OF PROBIOTICS
  5. 05TYPES AND SOURCES OF PROBIOTICS FOR POULTRY
  6. 06STRAIN-SPECIFIC EFFECTS AND QUANTITATIVE EVIDENCE
  7. 07GENERAL MECHANISMS OF PROBIOTICS IN THE DIGESTIVE TRACT
  8. 08IMMUNE SYSTEM IN POULTRY
  9. 09MUCOSAL IMMUNITY (GALT)
  10. 10INNATE IMMUNITY
  11. 11ADAPTIVE IMMUNITY
  12. 12GUT–IMMUNE AXIS RELATIONSHIP IN POULTRY
  13. 13THE EFFECT OF PROBIOTICS ON POULTRY IMMUNITY
  14. 14PROBIOTICS IN INCREASING INNATE IMMUNITY
  15. 15PROBIOTICS AND ADAPTIVE IMMUNITY
  16. 16EFFECTS ON MAJOR IMMUNE ORGANS
  17. 17PROBIOTICS IN REDUCING STRESS AND INFLAMMATION
  18. 18PROBIOTIC–MICROBIOTA INTERACTIONS IN SUPPORTING IMMUNITY
  19. 19THE EFFECT OF PROBIOTICS ON DISEASE RESISTANCE IN POULTRY
  20. 20FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE THE SUCCESS OF PROBIOTICS
  21. 21DOSAGE AND DURATION OF ADMINISTRATION
  22. 22DOSAGE FORM
  23. 23STABILITY AND RESISTANCE TO PH AND TEMPERATURE
  24. 24COMBINATION WITH PREBIOTICS (SYNBIOTICS)
  25. 25BACTERIAL STRAINS USED
  26. 26IN OVO AND EARLY-LIFE PROBIOTIC ADMINISTRATION
  27. 27CHALLENGES AND LIMITATIONS OF PROBIOTIC USE
  28. 28IMPLICATIONS FOR THE POULTRY INDUSTRY
  29. 29MARKET TRENDS AND REGIONAL ADOPTION PATTERNS
  30. 30SHORT-TERM APPLICABLE STRATEGIES FOR INDUSTRY IMPLEMENTATION
  31. 31ILLUSTRATIVE COMMERCIAL CASE EXAMPLES
  32. 32LONG-TERM RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT GOALS
  33. 33EMERGING ANALYTICAL APPROACHES
  34. 34FURTHER RESEARCH DIRECTIONS
  35. 35CONCLUSION
  36. 36GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE DECLARATION
  37. 37AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS
Text size
Work overview

Section 11 of 37

ADAPTIVE IMMUNITY

Andreas Berny Yulianto, Aswin Rafif Khairullah, Widya Paramita Lokapirnasari, Mohammad Anam Al-Arif, Zulfi Nur Amrina Rosyada, Emy Koestanti Sabdoningrum, Bodhi Agustono, Mirni Lamid, Kartika Purnamasari, Bima Putra Pratama, Riza Zainuddin Ahmad, Wasito Wasito, Saifur Rehman, and Muhammad Aviv Firdaus · about 3 minutes

Adaptive immunity in birds is a specific defense system that develops after exposure to an antigen [102]. This mechanism comprises two main components: a humoral response involving B cells and antibody production, and a cellular response dependent on T lymphocyte activity [103]. These two mechanisms complement each other in specifically recognizing and neutralizing pathogens, while also forming an immunological memory that allows for a faster and more effective response upon subsequent exposure [104].

The humoral response is characterized by the production of various immunoglobulins (Ig), including IgA, IgM, and IgY (equivalent to IgG in mammals) [105]. IgA is the primary antibody on the intestinal mucosal surface and helps protect the epithelium by neutralizing pathogens and toxins, thereby preventing excessive colonization [106]. IgM appears earliest in the first stage of infection and functions to activate the complement system, while IgY provides long-term systemic protection against circulating pathogens [107]. In birds, the bursa of Fabricius is an essential lymphoid organ where B cells mature and differentiate, enabling the formation of a diverse and effective antibody repertoire [108].

The cellular response involves T lymphocytes, which include CD4⁺ (T helper) and CD8⁺ (T cytotoxic) subsets [109]. CD4⁺ cells regulate the activity of various immune cells through cytokine production, while CD8⁺ cells are responsible for recognizing and destroying virus-infected or abnormal cells [110]. The activity of these two types of T cells is influenced by signals from dendritic cells and macrophages, which present antigens [111]. This collaboration ensures the formation of a specific and targeted adaptive immune response. Nevertheless, cytokine modulation does not consistently translate into measurable improvements in protective immunity, indicating that immunological biomarkers and functional protection are not always directly correlated [112].

Probiotic supplementation has been shown to enhance the adaptive immune response in poultry. However, these immunomodulatory effects are highly dependent on the specific probiotic strain, administered dose, duration of supplementation, and the type of vaccine used. These microorganisms can increase B and T cell proliferation, promote mucosal IgA secretion, and increase post-vaccination antibody titers, including against Newcastle disease virus (NDV) and Infectious Bursal Disease Virus (IBDV) [113]. Nevertheless, variations in probiotic dosage and vaccination protocols may lead to differing magnitudes, or even absence, of immune enhancement. Probiotic supplementation has been associated with increased mucosal IgA and, in some cases, enhanced post-vaccination antibody titers [114]. However, enhancement of vaccine responses is not universally observed and appears highly strain-, dose-, and context-dependent.

Nevertheless, several studies have reported inconsistent or limited effects of probiotics on vaccine-induced antibody titers, with some trials showing no significant improvement in NDV or IBDV seroconversion compared with non-supplemented controls (additional references to be included) [115]. In some cases, immune enhancement was transient, marginal, or statistically non-significant, particularly when baseline immune status was already optimal or when suboptimal probiotic doses were used.

Furthermore, probiotics influence cytokine regulation, including increases in IL-10 and IFN-γ, which help balance pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory immune responses [116]. However, cytokine modulation does not always translate into measurable improvements in vaccine efficacy, highlighting the complexity of host–microbe–vaccine interactions. These cytokine-modulating effects are context-dependent and may vary according to host genetics, immune status, and vaccine challenge conditions [116]. These effects not only increase resistance to infection but also reduce the risk of tissue damage caused by excessive inflammation.