Full report

Original page 1

4 • NASA Technical Memorandum 104566, Vol.24 SeaWiFS Technical Report Series Stanford B. Hooker and Elaine R. Firestone, Editors Volume 24, SeaWiFS Technical Report Series Cumulative Index: Volumes 1-23 Elaine R. Firestone and Stanford B.Hooker OCCAM (NASA-TM-104556) SeaWiFS TECHNICAL N95-30236 REPORT SERIES. VOLUME 2**: SeaWiFS TECHNICAL REPORT SERIES CUMULATIVE June 1995 INDEX, VOLUMES 1-23 (NASA. Goddard Unclas Space Flight Center) 39 p G3/48 0056677

Original page 2

NASA Technical Memorandum 104566, Vol.24 SeaWiFS Technical Report Series Stanford B. Hooker, Editor Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, Maryland Elaine R. Firestone, Technical Editor General Sciences Corporation Laurel, Maryland Volume 24, SeaWiFS Technical Report Series Cumulative Index: Volumes 1-23 Elaine R. Firestone General Sciences Corporation Laurel, Maryland Stanford B. Hooker NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, Maryland National Aeronautics and Space Administration Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, Maryland 20771 1995

Original page 3

This publication is available from the NASA Center for AeroSpace Information,. 800 Elkridge Landing Road, Linthicum Heights, MD 21090-2934, (301) 621-0390.

Original page 4

E.R. Firestone and S.B. Hooker ABSTRACT The Sea-viewing Wide Field-of-view Sensor (SeaWiFS) is the follow-on ocean color instrument to the Coastal Zone Color Scanner (CZCS), which ceased operations in 1986, after an eight-year mission. SeaWiFS is expected to be launched in 1995, on the SeaStar satellite, being built by Orbital Sciences Corporation (OSC). The SeaWiFS Project at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's (NASA) Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC), has undertaken the responsibility of documenting all aspects of this mission, which is critical to the ocean color and marine science communities. This documentation, entitled the SeaWiFS Technical Report Series, is in the form of NASA Technical Memorandum Number 104566. All reports published are volumes within the series. This particular volume serves as a reference, or guidebook, to the previous 23 volumes and consists of 6 sections including: an errata, an addendum (summaries of various SeaWiFS Working Group Biooptical Algorithm and Protocols Subgroups Workshops, and other auxiliary information), an index to key words and phrases, a list of all references cited, and lists of acronyms and symbols used. It is the editors' intention to publish a cumulative index of this type after every five volumes in the series. Each index covers the topics published in all previous editions, that is, each new index will include all of the information contained in the preceeding indices. 1. INTRODUCTION This is the fourth in a series of indices, published as a separate volume in the Sea-viewing Wide Field-of-view (SeaWiFS) Technical Report Series, and covers information found in the first 23 volumes of the series. The Report Series is written under the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's (NASA) Technical Memorandum (TM) Number 104566. The volume numbers, authors, and titles are as follows: Vol. 1: S.B. Hooker, W.E. Esaias, G.C. Feldman, W.W. Gregg, and C.R. McClain, An Overview of Sea WiFS and Ocean Color. Vol. 2: W.W. Gregg, Analysis of Orbit Selection for SeaWiFS: Ascending vs. Descending Node. Vol. 3: C.R. McClain, W.E. Esaias, W. Barnes, B. Guenther, D. Endres, S.B. Hooker, E.G. Mitchell, and R. Barnes, SeaWiFS Calibration and Validation Plan. Vol. 4: C.R. McClain, E. Yeh, and G. Fu, An Analysis of GAC Sampling Algorithms: A Case Study. Vol. 5: J.L. Mueller and R.W. Austin, Ocean Optics Protocols for Sea WiFS Validation. Vol. 6: E.R. Firestone and S.B. Hooker, SeaWiFS Technical Report Series Cumulative Index: Volumes 1-5. Vol. 7: M. Darzi, Cloud Screening for Polar Orbiting Visible and IR Satellite Sensors. Vol. 8: S.B. Hooker, W.E. Esaias, and L.A. Rexrode, Proceedings of the First SeaWiFS Science Team Meeting. ' ' Vol. 9: W.W. Gregg, F. Chen, A. Mezaache, J. Chen, and J. Whiting, The Simulated Sea- WiFS Data Set. Vol. 10: R.H. Woodward, R.A. Barnes, W.E. Esaias, W.L. Barnes, A.T. Mecherikunnel, Modeling of the SeaWiFS Solar and Lunar Observations. Vol. 11: F.S. Patt, C.M. Hoisington, W.W. Gregg, and P.L. Coronado, Analysis of Selected Orbit Propagation Models. Vol. 12: E.R. Firestone and S.B. Hooker, SeaWiFS Technical Report Series Cumulative Index: Volumes 1-11. Vol. 13: C.R. McClain, J.C. Comiso, R.S. Fraser, J.K. Firestone, B.D. Schieber, E-n. Yeh, K.R. Arrigo, and C.W. Sullivan, Case Studies for Sea- WiFS Calibration and Validation, Part 1. Vol. 14: J.L. Mueller, The First SeaWiFS Intercalibration Round-Robin Experiment, SIRREX-1, July 1992. Vol. 15: W.W. Gregg, F.S. Patt, and R.H. Woodward, The Simulated SeaWiFS Data Set, Version 2. Vol. 16: Mueller, J.L., B.C. Johnson, C.L. Cromer, J.W. Cooper, J.T. McLean, S.B. Hooker, and T.L. Westphal, The Second SeaWiFS Intercalibration Round-Robin Experiment, SIR- REX-2, June 1993. Vol. 17: Abbott, M.R., O.B. Brown, H.R. Gordon, K.L. Carder, R.E. Evans, F.E. Muller-Karger, and W.E. Esaias, Ocean Color in the 21st Century: A Strategy for a 20-Year Time Series.

Original page 5

SeaWiFS Technical Report Series Cumulative Index: Volumes 1-23 Vol. 18: Firestone, E.R., and S.B. Hooker, SeaWiFS Technical Report Series Summary Index: Volumes 1-17. Vol. 19: McClain, C.R., R.S. Eraser, J.T. McLean,M. Darzi, J.K. Firestone, F.S. Patt, B.D. Schieber, R.H. Woodward, E-n. Yeh, S. Mattoo, S.F. Biggar, P.N. Slater, K.J. Thome, A.W. Holmes, R.A. Barnes, and K.J. Voss, Case Studies for SeaWiFS Calibration and Validation, Part 2. Vol. 20: Hooker, S.B., C.R. McClain, J.K. Firestone, T.L. Westphal, E-n. Yeh, and Y. Ge, The Sea- WiFS Bio-Optical Archive and Storage System (SeaBASS), Part 1. Vol. 21: Acker, J.G., The Heritage of SeaWiFS: A Retrospective on the CZCS NIMBUS Experiment Team (NET) Program. Vol. 22: Barnes, R.A., W.L. Barnes, W.E. Esaias, and C.R. McClain, Prelaunch Acceptance Report for the SeaWiFS Radiometer. Vol. 23: Barnes, R.A., A.W. Holmes, W.L. Barnes, W.E. Esaias, C.R. McClain, and T. Svitek, Sea WiFS Prelaunch Radiometric Calibration and Spectral Characterization. keyword, Vol.# ch. #. Figures or tables that provide particularly important summary information are also indicated as separate entries in the page field. In this case, the figure or table number is given with the page number on which it appears. 2. ERRATA 1. In Volume 23, Table 19, the headers entitled Radiance and Counts should be switched. 3. ADDENDA This section presents a summary of the Fifth SeaWiFS Bio-optical Algorithm and Optical Protocols Workshop (BAOPW-5) held on 21 February 1995 at the Rosenstiel School of Marine and AtmosphericSciences in Miami, Florida; submitted by C. McGlain. The primary workshop objectives were to: 1) finalize the initial operational SeaWiFS pigment, K(4QO), and chlorophyll a algorithms; 2) review the field programs and bio-optical data sets; and 3) discuss proposed changes in standard data products. This volume within the series serves as a reference, or The team members and invited guests are listed in Taguidebook, to the aforementioned volumes. It consists of ble 1. the four main sections included with the first two indices published, Volumes 6 and 12, in the series: a cumulative Table 1. Team members and invited guests to the index to key words and phrases, a glossary of acronyms, BAOPW-5, held 21 February, 1995 at the Rosenstiel a list of symbols used, and a bibliography of all references cited in the series. In addition, as in Volumes 12 and 18, errata and addenda sections have been added to address issues and needed corrections that have come to the editors' attention since the volumes were first published. School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences (RS- MAS) in Miami, Florida. The subgroup memberships are as listed in Hooker et al. (1993). Attendees are identified with a checkmark (/ ). Team Present Team Present The nomenclature of the index is a familiar one, in the Members Members sense that it is a sequence of alphabetical entries, but it uti- J. Aiken O. Kopelevich lizes a unique format since multiple volumes are involved. (G. Moore) / M. Lewis / Unless indicated otherwise, the index entries refer to some W. Balch / C. McClain / aspect of the SeaWiFS instrument or project, for example, K. Carder / . G. Mitchell / the mission overview index entry refers to an overview of D. Clark / A. Morel An index entry is composed of a G. Cota / J. Mueller / the SeaWiFS mission. keyword or phrase followed by an entry field that directs C. Davis / F. Muller- / the reader to the possible locations where a discussion of R. Doerffer / Karger The entry field is normally W. Esaias / D. Siegel / the keyword can be found. made up of a volume identifier shown in bold face, fol- H. Gordon / R. Smith lowed by a pages identifier, which is always enclosed in F. Hoge / C. Trees / parentheses: keyword, volume(pages). S. Hooker / C. Yentsch D. Kamykowski J. Yoder / If an entry is the subject of an entire volume, the volume M. Kishino / R. Zaneveld / field is shown in slanted type without a page field: keyword, Vol. #. An entry can also be the subject of a complete chapter, as in Volumes 13 and 19 (to name a few). In this instance, both the volume number and chapter number appear without a page field: Other Attendees R. Arnone S. Gallegos J. Campbell S. Hawes R. Evans N. Maynard R. Frouin J. Morrow H. Fukushima

Original page 6

E.R. Firestone and S.B. Hooker 3.1 BAOPW-5 1. Introduction (C. McClain): A. Workshop Objectives and Agenda B. Review of Action Items from the NovemberWorkshop C. SeaStar/SeaWiFS Update 2. Data Set Development for Algorithm Evaluation (J. Campbell): At the last bio-optical algorithm workshop in November, it was agreed that investigators would submit data for the verification of certain components of the operational chlorophyll algorithm, as well as evaluate the final chlorophyll retrievals. Campbell agreed to be the point of contact for the data submissions and will provide a status report. She gave a brief summary of what she personally has received [others have sent data directly to the SeaWiFS Bio-Optical Archive and Storage System (SeaBASS)].She received data from A. Bricaud, C. Yentsch, and M. Kishino. She will provide these data to the SeaWiFS Project after some editing and reformatting. Also, permission is being sought to release Bricaud's data to the SeaBASS archive. 3. Operational Chlorophyll a Algorithm (K. Carder): Only minor modifications have been made to the algorithm since the November 1994 meeting. Preliminary analyses of Arabian Sea data and results from airborne oceanographic lidar (AOL)data obtained from the Mid- Atlantic Bight compare well with the algorithm. Initial analyses of California Cooperative Fisheries Institute (CalCoFI) data, by G. Mitchell, indicate that the algorithm underestimates chlorophyll by a factor of 2-5. Mitchell's analysis, however, was based on the ratios of subsurface upwelling radiance to subsurface downwelling irradiance and not remote sensing reflectances. D. Siegel made a recommendation that should improve the chlorophyll retrieval at low concentrations and will provide the details to Carder later. 4. CZCS Pigment Algorithm (G. Moore): At the November workshop, G. Moore presented a draft document for the bio-optics group to review and made a recommendation on a radiance ratio algorithm. The group suggested that the algorithm should include a band ratio in the green. Moore has incorporated this suggestion and others and has submitted a revised version of the document to the SeaWiFS Project for publication in the SeaWiFS Technical Report Series. 5. #(490) Algorithm (J. Mueller): The results of Mueller's analysis of the effect of the 5 nm shift in the 555nm 6. Final Results from the First Data Analysis Round- Robin (DARR-1) (D. Siegel): Siegel reviewed the results of the first data analysis round-robin, which had not changed since the November meeting. For Case- 1 water, all the methods worked equally well below 600 nm, but diverged in the near-infrared. Turbid water cases were not considered. The summary document has also been submitted to the SeaWiFS Project for publication in the series. 7. Second Data Analysis Round-Robin (DARR-2) Planning (D. Siegel): Two topics of interest were discussed, turbid water and the extrapolation of values to the surface from observations at discrete levels only as is the case for moorings and drifters. C. Davis volunteered to hold a workshop to discuss measurement protocols for Case-2 waters, but thought it was premature to hold a data analysis round-robin. D. Clark volunteered to host DARR-2 to evaluate the analysis issue associated with moorings and drifters. The dates for these events will not be scheduled until the SeaWiFS launch schedule is clarified in April. 8. 18-Month Time Series of MER-2040/2041 Calibration (G. Mitchell): The time series of the Scripps Photobiology Group's MER-2040/2041 instrument calibration for 18 months was presented. During this time, radiometric calibrations at Biospherical Instruments, Inc. (BSI) and the San Diego State University (SDSU) Center for Hydro-Optics and Remote Sensing (CHORS) have been completed with both integrating spheres and reflectance plaques at each facility (total of three separate spheres and three separate plaques). Immersion coefficients have been determined as well. The CHORS and BSI calibrations are in good agreement for most wavelengths. The calibrations are particularly consistent over the past three calibrations, the UV bands being a notable exception. These results are tangible evidence that the calibration round-robins are helping to improve the reliability, consistency, and traceability of the ocean color community's instrument calibrations. 9. Protocol for Determining Algorithm Accuracy (J. Campbell): In reporting the accuracy of a model or algorithm, it is important to distinguish between systematic errors and random errors. A statement such as "This algorithm is accurate to within 30%," is very ambiguous. It says nothing about whether errors are random or systematic, and whether the range is 1a or 3 a. A protocol is presented here for determining the accuracy of an algorithm, and for testing and reporting both systematic and random errors. Campbell distributed a document describing the protocol and analysis based on the CZCS NET algorithm data set. SeaWiFS band from the 550nm CZCS band indicates 10. Band-to-Band Correlation Analysis (J. Mueller): The the effect is small and that no change in the prelaunch algorithm [the Austin-Petzold CZCS #(490) algorithm] is required. The analysis was based on 44 optical profiles provided by C. Trees, D. Siegel, and G. Mitchell. issue of instrumental band center wavelength differences was discussed at the May 1994 workshop (Firestone and Hooker 1995) and remains unresolved. Mueller has performed further empirical orthogonal function

Original page 7

SeaWiFS Technical Report Series Cumulative Index: Volumes 1-23 (EOF) analyses on the NET data from D. Clark. The (OCTS) check-out] and again in September 1996 afanalysis showed that in order to obtain a meaningful ter refurbishment. YBOM will be in a year-long cyresult, the radiances had to be extrapolated to a com- cle whereby it will be in the water for nine months, mon depth, e.g., the surface. For the irradiance fields, and then out of the water for three months, for rethe variance was contained in the first few EOFs, but furbishment. for upwelling radiance, a large number were required. F. German Field Program Update (R. Doerffer): The His conclusion was that the data was too noisy for this Germans will be in the Arabian Sea during July and analysis and that more recent data from higher quality will collect in-water bio-optical and remote sensspectrometers should be used. Such data exists from a ing reflectance data. Doerffer described the Picasso number of sources and he will pursue this work further. Program proposal to put four optical platforms in 11. Field Program Reports: The intent of these reports is place. Picasso participants include the Joint Renot to present results, but activities. Updates should search Center (JRC) and the British. The platform review recent and future cruise plans, numbers of sta- sites are the northern Adriatic, Baltic, and North tions, data collected, status of analysis and data de- Seas. livery to the SeaWiFS Project, etc. Each presentation 12. Proposed Scheme for Variable Quality Level-3 Prodshould be no longer than 15 minutes. ucts (R. Evans): Evans described his proposal for in- A. Bermuda Bio-Optical Time Series (D. Siegel): The corporating variable quality data into the level -3 prodbio-optical data collection will continue until at least ucts. The scheme allows for level-2 data, which is December 1995. After that time, Siegel is unclear deemed less accurate or reliable, to be binned when how the time-series will be supported. It appears no higher quality data is available for a particular binunlikely, at this time, that the National Science ning cell. The scheme can be applied in either space or Foundation (NSF) will support the program in fis- time binning. Before the scheme can be accepted, the cal year (FY) 1996 and he is not optimistic about Science Working Group (SWG) must approve it. The NSF support in FY97. bio-optics group voice general support for the concept. B. CalCoFI Bio-Optical Data Set (G. Mitchell): Mit- A more detailed description will be circulated to the chell has cruises planned in April, July, and Octo- SWG for comment. ber 1995. During each cruise, about 70 bio-optical 13. Proposed Revisions in the Level-3 Products (C. Mcstations will be taken. Clain): The present set of quality masks and flags used C. Navy Field Program Update (C. Davis): The Navy, as exclusion criteria in the level-3 binning process are NASA, and NSF will support a total of eight cruises defined so as to yield high quality pigment and AT(490) During the last level-3 products; all other parameters binned in the with optics in the Arabian Sea. cruise, much of the time was spent towing an in- level-3 product are subject to the same criteria. At the sta- present time, there is only one level-3 product containstrument array. Nonetheless, 20 bio-optical tions were collected. Their bio-optical measurement ing several binned quantities. As a result, the level-3 profiles, remote sensing product eliminates useful information on some quantisuite included radiometer reflectance measurements, and Q measurements. D. United Kingdom Field Program Update (G.Moore): The British have a fair number of cruises scheduled for 1995 and 1996. Of particular interest is the Antarctic Survey's transects of the Atlantic during May and September of each year. These cruises have many berths available and will stop daily for bio-optical casts (2 hours maximum station time). The Falkland Islands would be the point of departure for the September leg and the point of embarkation for the May leg. ties of interest, e.g., coccolithophore blooms and high aerosol radiances. Defining additional level-3 products, using exclusion criteria appropriate to each product while eliminating parameters of limited utility from the present level-3 product, would extend the applications for SeaWiFS, but not substantially increase the number of data granules or volumes submitted to the Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) Distributed Active Archive Center (DAAC). Examples of this might be a pigment product, a coccolithophore product, or an aerosol product. The bio-optics group endorsed the idea of smaller, but more numerous level-3 products E. Japanese Field Program Update (M. Kishino): The and McClain will circulate a strawman to the SWG for Japanese have an impressive manifest of bio-optical comment. cruises scheduled in the Pacific (from the Bering Sea to Antarctica) during 1995 and 1996. (The manifest is too long to recite here.) The Yamato Bank 3.1.1 Action Items Optical Mooring (YBOM) will be deployed during The following are the action items, and people respon- April-July 1996 [Ocean Color Temperature Sensor sible for them, that arose from the meeting.

Original page 8

E.R. Firestone and S.B. Hooker 1. J. Campbell will submit the Bricaud and Morel absorption data and the Yentsch pigment data to the SeaWiFS Project for inclusion in the Sea- BASS database. 2. K. Carder will submit the data set he is using for the chlorophyll algorithm. 3. D. Clark will organize and host DARR-2. 4. C. Davis will organize and host a workshop on turbid Case-2 data collection and analysis. 5. D. Siegel will work with K. Carder on a modification to the chlorophyll a algorithm to improve estimates at low values. 6. J. Mueller will pursue higher quality spectral data for the EOF analysis. Possible sources of this are D. Clark and C. Davis. 7. C. McClain and R. Evans will draft strawmen proposals for revisions in the level-3 products. These will be circulated together for comment by the SWG.

Original page 9

SeaWiFS Technical Report Series Cumulative Index: Volumes 1-23 CUMULATIVE INDEX Unless indicated otherwise, the index entries that follow refer to some aspect of the SeaWiFS instrument or project. For example, the mission overview index entry refers to an overview of the SeaWiFS mission. -Aabsorption study: pressure and oxygen, 13(cii. 3). absorption correction, 13(19-20). acceptance report: prelaunch, see SeaWiFS instrument, addenda, 12(3-8); 18(3-22). Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer, see AVHRR. aerosol models, 8(17). airborne spectral radiometry, 5(7-8). aircraft calibration technique, 3(Fig. 19 p.27). algorithms, 1(3, 17); 4(2). atmospheric correction cont. see also algorithms, atmospheric correction, atmospheric measurements, 5(2, 28-29). at-satellite radiances, 15(7-13, Table 10 p. 11). AVHRR: deriving vegetation index, 7(2). GAG data, 7(3-4). LAC data, 7(2-4). LDTNLR test, 7(4). nighttime IR data, 7(5). thermal IR channels, 7(1). azimuth: angles at equinox, 2(2, 10, 16). angles at solstice, 2(Fig. 5 p. 7, 10, 16). satellite angle, 13(46). solar angle, 2(2, 16); 7(1); 13(Table 11 p. 29, 46). spacecraft angle, 2(2, Fig. 6 p. 8, 16); 13(Table 11 p. 29). relative angle, 2(2, Fig. 7 p. 9, 10, Fig. 10 p. 13, 16). atmospheric correction, 1(19); 3(1-2, Fig. 4 p. 5, 16, 23, -B- 27-28, 31, 32-34); 8(4, Table 1 p. 14, 17, Table 4 p. 21); 13(1, 4, 9, 27); 17(16); 18(11-12); 21(19-20). bio-optical, Vol.5; 12(3-5); 20(ch.3). data, 9(1); 12(3-4). database development, 3(28). derived products, 3(27-28); 13(1). development, 1(5); 3(23, 27-35, Fig. 22 p. 33); 5(Table 4 p. 11); 8(4, 10). field studies, 3(30-32, Fig. 22 p. 33, 34-35). input values, 13(Table 16 p. 44). linearity and stability, 5(12). optical measurements, Vol.5. pigment, 3(28, 29); 8(24); 13(1, 12); 18(3, 4, 14). validation of, 1(3); 8(16, Table 4 p. 21). see also bio-optical, algorithm. see also GAG. see also Protocols Workshop, along-trade, 3(38). see also propagation model, ancillary: data climatologies, 13(2, ch. 7, and Plates 16-18). data sets, 8(7); 15(7); 19(ch. 6, ch. 7). measurements, 5(8, 9, 20, 27-28, 30, 33). see also data, ancillary, animation: meteorological data sets, 13(41-42). ozone data sets, 13(41-42). ascending node, Vol.2. computation methods, 2(1-2). tilt strategy, 2(Table 1 p. 2). atmospheric conditions, 9(6-7). atmospheric contributions, 9(4-6). baselines, 8(6-13). algorithms, 8(6-7). ancillary data, 8(7). data archive and delivery, 8(9-10). data for bio-optical algorithms, 8(10). data for vicarious calibration, 8(10-11). data processing and software, 8(8-9). data products, 8(12-13). data quality and acceptance, 8(7-8). detector failure contingency, 8(11). equator crossing contingency, 8(12). ground station support, 8(11). in situ data policy, 8(13). launch slip contingency, 8(11). level-2 masks and flags, 18(Table 9 p. 18). level-2 products, 18(Table 7 p. 17). level-3 binned products, 18(Table 8 p. 17). level-3 binning, 8(8, 16). loss of tilt contingency, 8(11). navigation accuracy contingency, 8(11). optical protocols, 8(12). orbit contingency, 8(12). orbited altitude contingency, 8(11). power limitation contingency, 8(11). products, 3(27-28); 5(1). real-time data access, 8(12). recommendations, 8(13-19). revised product list, 18(16-18). see also data. basin-scale processes, 1(4, 6-7). biogeochemical, 1(2, 19); 8(1). atmospheric correction, 1(3, 5, 7); 3(1, 2, Fig. 4 p. 5, 8, 13, 23, properties, 5(6-7). 24, 27, 28-29, 31, 32-34); 4(1); 5(1, 3, 6, 7, 10, 13); 8(4, see also Science Team Meeting, Abstracts, 6, 7, 26-27, 30-31, 36-37, 42); 14(1); 17(6, 16); 18(13); bio-optical: 19(ch. 1, Fig. 1 p. 11); 21(19-20). subgroup, 18(11-12). algorithm working group members, 8(Table 1 p. 14); 12(Table 1 p. 3, 3); 18(Table 1 p. 3, Table 5 p. 12, Table 6 p. 14).

Original page 10

E.R. Firestone and S.B. Hooker bio-optical cont. calibration cont. Algorithm Workshop, 12(3-5, 6-8); 18(3-7, 12-16, 10). see also Sphere. algorithms, 1(19); 3( 1-2, 6, 8, 11-12, 13, 16, 23, 28-29, calibration and validation, 1(3, 8, 14, 18-22); Vol.3; 17(3, 5-6, Fig. 20 p. 29, 29, 30-31, 32, Fig. 22 p. 33, 34); 4(3); Vol. 5; 8(6, 10); 13(27). data!2(Table 2 p. 4). data set, 3(8, 13, 16, 29, 30); 18(4, Table 2 p. 5). data system 20(ch. 2). see also algorithm. see also algorithm development, bio-optics, 1(3, 5, 7, 19); 8(10). algorithm, 13(1, ch. 1, 27). bright target recovery, 15(Fig. 8 p. 15). Brouwer-Lyddane model, 11(2-5, 11, 15-16, Figs. 5-8 pp. 8-9, Fig. 13 p. 12); 15(2-3). see also models, buoy: see MOBY. see optical buoy. see optical mooring. CDF, 13(35, Table 14 p. 36); 19(ch.5). 10-14, 15). baselines, 3(17); 8(3). case studies, Vol.13; Vol.19. cruises, 17(15-17). field deployment, 8(17, Table 2 p. 18, Table 4 p. 20); 18(Fig. 1 p. 6). on board, 3(21-23). post-launch, 3(23-27). prelaunch program, 3(17-21). program milestones, 3(Fig. 12 p. 14). program schematic, 3(Fig. 11 p. 14). team (CVT), 13(1). see also baselines. see also calibration. see also CVT. see also initialization. see also round-robin. -C- characterization: calibration, 5(2); 10(Tables 1-2 p. 4, Fig. 3 p. 6, Fig. 20 p.23, Fig. 21 p. 24); Vol.14; Vol.16. background on, 10(2-3). equations, 23(8-14, 18). experiment, 19(Fig. 14 p. 29; Table 16 p. 30; Figs. 15-17 pp. 31-32). initialization, 5(4-6). in situ instruments, 14(2). collector cosine response, 5(18-19). immersion factors, 5(19-20). pressure effects, 5(21). radiance field-of-view, 5(18). radiometric, 5(15-17). spectral bandpass, 5(15). temperature, 5(20-21). temporal response, 5(17). lunar, 1(11, 18); 3(Fig. 15 p. 22); 10(1-3, 7, 10, Table 3 p. 10, chlorophyll concentration, 1(4-5, 15); 3(27, 34); 4(2); 7(1); Fig. 9 p. 11, Figs. 12-15 pp. 14-17, Fig. 16 p. 20, Fig. 19 p. 22, Table 4-5 p. 19, 25); 15(Fig. 2 p. 5, Table 5 p. 7, Figs. 22-23 pp. 34-35). climatology generation, 13(40-41). onboard, 3(21); 5(2-3); 10(1-2). cloud detection, 7(1, 5). pigment, 5(24). preflight solar-based, 19(ch. 3). quality control, 10(25). cloud screening, Vol. 7. round-robin, 8(4, 17, Table 4 p. 21); Vol. 14; Vol. 16; 18(3, 9, 13-14, 15). sensor, 1(11); 5(2-3); 17(2, 3). solar, 1(11, 18); 3(24); 10(1-7, Fig. 2 p. 5, Fig. 4 p. 6, Figs. 5- 8 pp. 8-9, Figs. 10-11 pp. 12-13, 18); 15(Fig. 3 p. 6, Table 5 p. 7, Fig. 20 p.32). solar diffuser, 10(3-5, 7); 23(10). 8(14, 24, 30, 36); 9(1, 3, 9); 14(1); 15(7); 17(2, 5); 19 (Fig. 7 p. 17, Fig. 11 p.20). MODIS, 7(1). see also MODIS-N. determining thresholds, 7(2-3). direct thresholds, 7(1-4). evaluating methods, 7(5-6). more complex methods, 7(4-5). spatial coherence, 7(3-4). see also AVHRR GAC data. spectral, 5(24). GOADS: sphere test, 14(Fig. B2 p. 48, Table B2 p. 49). subgroup meeting, 18(11). data, 13(Plates 16-18). time series, 13(36-40). sun photometers, 5(24). Coastal Zone Color Scanner, see CZCS. system test, 14(Fig. Bl p. 48). command: trend analysis, 10(25). vicarious, 5(2-4); 8(10-11). schedules, 15(3-7, Table 3 p. 4, Table 4 p. 6). sequence, 15(Tables 7-8 p. 11). working group members, 8(Table 1 p. 14). commercial applications, 1(7). see also calibration and validation. Common Data Format, see CDF. see also round-robin. Comprehensive Ocean-Atmosphere Data Set, see GOADS, see also SeaStar. contingencies: see also SIRREX. detector failure, 8(11).

Original page 11

SeaWiFS Technical Report Series Cumulative Index: Volumes 1-23 contingencies cont. equator crossing, 8(12). launch slip, 8(11). loss of tilt, 8(11). navigation accuracy, 8(11). orbit, 8(12). orbital altitude, 8(11). power limitation, 8(11). correction study: pressure and oxygen, 13(ch. 4). cross-track, see propagation model, cross-track scan, see SeaWiFS instrument, cumulative: index, 6(1-3); 12(9-13); 18(23-28). CVT, 13(1). CZCS, 1(1, 5, 6-7, 19); 3(1). algorithms, 3(1-11, 23); 13(ch. 1); 19(ch. 1). application of data, 9(7-9). calibration and validation, 17(10-11). channels, 7(1, 5). data collection, 3(6, Fig. 5 p. 5, 21, 30), 7(1). global sampling, 3(Fig. 9 p. 10). level-2 products, 4(1). level-2 processing parameters, 4(Table 2 p. 2). modeling compared to SeaWiFS, 3(Fig. 4 p. 5). orbit, 3(2). orbital characteristics, 9(Table 2 p. 3). overlapping scenes study, 13(ch. 5). parameters and characteristics, 1 (Table 2 p. 5), 3(Table 1 P.I). pigment algorithm, 13(Tables 12-13 p.31). 1, start and stop times, 9(Table 6 p. 9). pigment concentration, 1(5-6); 3(1-2, 8, 27); 13(1, 2, ch. data cont. management, 1(3, 11-18); 3(32). policy, 3(37-38); 8(13, Table 4 p. 21, 41-42). processing, 1(3, Fig. 2 p. 4, 11-16, Fig. 10 p. 20, 22); 3(13, 32); 7(5); 8(4, 8-9); 13(16, 21, 35); 17(3); 20(17-18). products, 4(20); 8(8, 12-13,15-17, Table 4 pp. 20-21, 42-43); 15(2). quality and acceptance, 8(7-8). requirements, 5(4-6). standard format, 19(ch. 5). subsampling, 4(1). system, 17(3-4, 12-14); 20(ch.2). using SEAPAK with, 4(1-2). data sets, 1(3); 5(3-4, 6, 8, 14, 33, 34, 35); 8(23, 33); Vol.9; Vol.15; 17(2, 5). animation of, 13(41-42). atmospheric conditions, 9(6-7). atmospheric contributions, 9(4-6). availability of, 9(9-13); 15(40). code for simulating, 9(13-15). currently held, 20(Table 2 p. 10). external, 15(Table 9 p. 11). griddedwind, 19(ch.8). meteorological, 13(35, Table 14 p. 36); 19(43, 47). meteorological animation, 13(41-42). methods for simulating, 9(2-7). normalized water-leaving radiances, 9(2-3). orbit model, 9(3-4). ozone, 13(35, Fig. 31 p.42); 19(43, 47). ozone animation, 13(41-42). simulated total radiances, 9(Figs. 2-4 pp. 10-12). Figs. 1-5 pp. 5-8, 9, Figs. 8-9 p. 11, 15, Figs. 14-16 pp. 17- ten-bit words and data structures, 9(7). 18, 22, Figs. 18-19 p. 26, Fig. 20 p. 28, Table 10 p. 29, ch. 6, viewing and solar geometries, 9(4-6). Table 18 p. 45, and Plates: 1-14, and 19-20); 17(6-7). quality control, 3(Fig. 7 p. 8, Fig. 8 p. 9, 32, 35). ringing mask comparison, 13(2, ch. 8, and Plate 19). sensor, 1(5); 3(8). sensor degradation, 3(23). time of launch, 2(1). vicarious calibration, 3(Fig. 6 p. 7, 11, 23, 24-27); 5(3-4). see also bio-optical, algorithms. see also NET. -Ddark level, see SeaWiFS instrument, data: access of, 8(12); 17(17). acquisition, 19(21-22). ancillary, 3(24, 35); 5(3); 7(5); 8(7); 13(2, Fig. 23 p.36); 19(ch.6, ch. 7). archive and delivery, 5(2); 8(9-10). collection, 3(24); 8(4). distribution, 1(16); 8(2, 4, 16, 17). see also bio-optical. see also SIRREX. see also storage, descending node, Vol. 2. see also ascending node, detector failure contingency, see contingencies. -E- EOS-Color, 17(3, 9-10, 11, 13-17). EOSDIS, 17(3, 13, 17). equator crossing time, 2(10, 16); 9(Tables 6-7 p. 9). contingency, 8(12). equinox: see azimuth. see sun glint. see zenith, errata, 12(2); 18(2-3). -Fformat, 3(32); 8(43-44); 12(5); 15(16-20, Fig. 9 p. 17); 19 field deployment, see calibration and validation, (ch.5). interpolation, 13(22). field-of-view, see SeaWiFS instrument, field program, 18(5, 15).

Original page 12

E.R. Firestone and S.B. Hooker field program cont. -J, Kcomputing network, 3(Fig. 21 p.31). joint commercial aspects, 1(8). instrumentation, 3(34-35). filter radiometer, 14(Table B9 p. 56). flags, 18(4-5). algorithm, 8(3, 4, 17). level-2, 18(Table 9 p. 18). level-2 processing, 8(7); 12(4, Table 3 p. 4). format: conventions, 20(4-5). standard data, 8(15); 19(ch. 5). -G- GAC, 1(3, 16); 15(4); 17(5, 12). algorithms, Vol.4. AVHRR data, 7(3). data, 15(2, 21-27, Figs. 11-14 pp. 22-25, and Plates 1-2). generation mechanisms, 4(Table 1 p. 1). generation methods, Vol.4. resolution, 4(Plates 1-8). sampling techniques, Vol.4. see also AVHRR. geometry, 2(1). derived parameters, 2(1). solar, 2(1, 10, 16). sun glint, 2(1). viewing, 2(1, 10, 16). see also azimuth. see also zenith, glint correction, 3(23); 8(17); 19(ch. 1, Fig. 1 p. 11). see also sun glint, global area coverage, see GAC. global-scale processes, 1(6-7). glossary: cumulative, 6(3-5); 12(14-17); 18(29-33). ground coverage, 2(2, Fig. 1 p.3). ground station support, 8(11). ground systems and support, 1(14-15). -H- Hierarchical Data Format, see HDF. HDF, 8(7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 15); 13(ch. 7); 19(ch.5). HRPT: data, 1(14,19); 8(8-9,19); 15(2, 4, 27, Figs. 24-27 pp. 36-39, and Plates 4-6). policies, 8(17, Table 4 p. 20). -Iindex, Vol.6; Vol.12; Vol. 18. infrared radiometers, 7(1). initialization, 5(4-6, Table 1 p.5). sampling, 5(31-32). intercalibration, Vol. 14; Vol. 16. data archive 14(56-57, Tables Cl and C2 p. 57). sources, 14(Table 1 p.4). -L- LAC, 1(3). data, 1(8, 11); 15(2, 4, 27, Figs. 16-19 pp. 28-31, and Plate 3). lamps, Vol.14; Vol. 16. apparent drift, 14(Fig. 6 p. 13). calibration setup, 14(Fig. B7 p. 53). GSFC reference, 14(Table 3 p. 12). irradiance, 14(Fig. B4 p. 50, Table B5 p. 52, Fig. B8 p. 53, Table B7 p. 55). operating currents, 14(Table 8 p. 28). standards, 16(3-23). see also calibration. see also spectral irradiance. see also spectral radiance. see also sphere. see also transfer, look-up tables, 8(4); 19(5-9). lunar observations, Vol.10. lunar reflectance, 3(23); 10(2-3, 7-25); 19(ch. 2); 23(9). -Mmarine optical buoy: see MOBY. see optical buoy, mask, 18(4-5). algorithm, 8(3, 4, 17). level-2, 18(Table9p.l8). level-2 processing, 3(6); 8(7); 12(4, Table 3 p. 4). Miami edge, 13(29). see also sun glint, measurement protocols, 5(26-33). meeting agenda, see Science Team Meeting, mesoscale processes, 1(6). Miami edge mask, 13(29). mission: operations, 1(14-18); 11(1-2, 15). overlap, 17(12). overview, Vol.1; 8(1). MOBY, 1(3); 8(3, 4). review attendees, 18(Table 4 p. 10). review summary, 18(9-11). system schematic, 3(Fig. 17 p.25). see also optical buoy; see also optical mooring, modeling, 10(1, 10, 18, 25). models: aerosol, 19(5-7, Tables 1-2 p. 6, Fig. 6 p. 17). chlorophyll concentration, 19(Fig. 7 p. 17, Fig. 11 p. 20). orbital prediction, 1(17). see also Brouwer-Lyddane models. see also modeling. see also perturbation models.

Original page 13

SeaWiFS Technical Report Series Cumulative Index: Volumes 1-23 models cont. see also propagation models. MODIS or MODIS-N, 1(19); 17(3, 5, 6-7, 8, 11, 13-15). instrument characteristics, 3(Table 4 p. 12). presentations, 8(3-5). orbit cont. downlink, 15(4, Table 3 p. 4). parameters, 1(18); 2(2). propagation, 15(3, Table 3 p. 3). see also propagation model, modulation transfer function, see SeaWiFS instrument, MTF. orbital: -Nnavigation, 8(11); 9(4); 11(2); 15(3). of pixels, 9(4). altitude contingency, 8(11). characteristics, 9(1, Table 3 p. 3); 15(Table Ib p. 3). elements, 11(2). overview, Vol.1. NET, 3(2, Figs. 1-3 pp. 2-4, 23, 27, 28, 29-30); 8(16); 12(4); see also index. Vol.21. areas of responsibility, 21(2-3). atmospheric correction algorithm, 21(19-20). chronology of events, 21(3-11). pigment algorithm, 3(Fig. 3 p. 3, Fig. 20 p. 29). research methods, 21(11, 16, 19). oxygen absorption band, 13(16, 19, Fig. 17 p. 19). ozone: absorption, 13(9, 21). concentration, 8(7); 9(5); 13(9, Figs. 6-7 p..lO, Figs. 11-12 p. 13, 30, and Plate 15); 16(7, 8). control point value, 13(Tables 7-9 pp. 24-25). sea-truth program, 21(11, Fig. 1 p. 12, Tables 2-6 pp. 13-14, correction, 13(ch. 4, and Plates 7-13). Figs. 2-6 pp. 15-18). team members, 21(Table 1 p. 3). netCDF, 19(ch. 5). NIMBUS Experiment Team, see NET. normalized water-leaving radiances, 1(15); 3(2, 6, 24, 28-29, data analysis, 13(1, ch. 2). images, 13(Plates 7-13). optical thickness, 13(Fig. 10 p. 12). see also data set, ozone. 37-38); 4(1-3, 20); 5(1, 3-4, 6, 8, 13, 31-32, 37-38); 8(16, -P- 42); 9(2-3). non-research uses, 1(7—8). -Oocean color, 1(1-4, 8, 10); 8(1-3, 22-43); 13(1, ch.4); Vol. 17. future missions, 3(Fig. 10 p. 12). requirements, 1(2). see also algorithm development, ocean optics protocols, Vol. 5; 8(12, 14-15, Table 4 p.20). see also Protocols Workshop. OCTS, 1(2); 3(11); 17(4, 10, 13, 17). instrument characteristics, 3(Table 3 p. 11). operational applications, 1(7-8). optical buoy, 3(Fig. 17 p. 25). drifting, 5(9, 31). mooring, 3(Fig. 18 p. 26); 5(8, 30-31). see also MOBY. optical instruments, Vol.5; 10(Figs. 17-19 pp. 21-22). optical measurements, 5(1). accuracy specifications, 5(9-15). analysis methods, 5(33-39). science community, role of, 5(3). sensor characterization, 5(15-25, Tables 2-4 pp. 10-11). see also MOBY. see also optical buoy. 8-11 primary productivity, 1(1); 5(7); 8(1, 15, 22-41); 17(8-9). optical thickness, 8(17); 19(5, 7, Tables 3-4 p. 7, Tables p. 10). Rayleigh, 3(34); 9(4-6, Table 4 p. 5); 13(cn. 3, ch.4). orbit, 3(23). characteristics, 9(Table 2 p. 3). contingency, 8(12). distribution of local time, 2(Fig. 2 p. 4). 10 perturbations model: general, 11(2-3). special, 11(2). photodetector measurements, 14(Table Al p.47). pigment, 17(7). algorithm, 3(28, 29);8(24). data, 9(2). database, 20(ch. 3). data sets, 20(18, Table 5 pp. 20-21, 21). concentration, l(Plates 1-5); 3(1, 2, 6, 8, 13, 23, 27, 28, 31-32, 35); 4(Table 1 p. 1, 2, Table 3 p. 3, Figs. 5-11 pp.6-9, 20, and Plates 1-8); 5(2); 7(1); 8(4, 14, 24, 30, 36, 40); 13(ch.2, ch.3); 17(7, 11, 15-16). mean, 13(Tables 1-2 p. 8). values, 4(Fig. 26 p. 15, Figs. 31-33 pp. 18-19). see also algorithm, pigment. see also calibration. see also CZCS, pigment concentration, pixel size, 3(Fig. Cl p. 39). Prelaunch Science Working Group, see SPSWG. pressure: surface, see surface pressure, pressure and oxygen: absorption study, 13(ch. 3). correction study, 13(ch. 4, and Plates: 8, 10, and 12). working group members, 8(Table 1 p. 14). proceedings: Science Team Meeting, Vol. 8. see also Science Team Meeting. Project, 1(3); 3(1, 13, 16, 23-24, 32, 34, 38). goals, 1(2-3).

Original page 14

E.R. Firestone and S.B. Hooker Project cont. objectives, 1(3). organization and personnel, l(Table 4 p. 22); 3(Fig. 13 p. 15). presentations, 8(3-5). responsibilities, 12(3-4). schematic, l(Fig. 8 p. 12, Fig. 9 p. 13). structure, 3(13-16). propagation model: -Ssatellite remote sensing, 7(1). saturation radiances, 3(Tables A2 through A4 pp. 36-37); 15 (Table 11 p. 13); 19(Table 5 p. 8). SBRC database, see SIRREX, SBRC database, scale, Vol. 14. see also transfer, scanning characteristics, 9(1). along-track, 11(5, Figs. 1-8 pp. 6-9, Fig. 11 p. 11, Figs. 12-14 science mission goals, 3(12-13). pp. 12-13, Fig. 16 p. 14). cross-track, 11(5, Fig. 9 p. 10, Fig. 15 p. 13, Fig. 17 p. 14). orbit, Vol.11. radial, 11(4, 5, Fig. 10 p. 10). Protocols Workshop, (ocean optics), 12(3, 5-8). attendees addresses, 12(6-8). Subgroup Workshop, 18(3, 7-9, 12-13, 14-16). team members and guests, 12(Table 1 p. 3); 18(Table 1 p. 3, Table 3 p. 7, Table 5 p. 12, Table 6 p. 14); 18(19-22). see also ocean optics. -Qquality control, 3(29-30, 35-36); 10(Fig. 20 p. 23): 12(5). flags, 12(3-4). level-1 screening, 3(35). level-2 product screening, 3(35-36). level-2 quality control, 3(35); 8(4). level-3 product screening, 3(36). masks, 12(4). see also bio-optical algorithmworkshop. -Rradial, see propagation model. radiance measurements, 14(Table 9 pp. 29-30, Table 10 p. 31, Fig. 15 p. 32, Table 11 pp. 33-35, 44); 16(Table 6-7 pp. 37- 44); 19(Figs. 2-6 pp. 14-15, 23). calibration factors, 16(Fig. 18 p.46). output, 14(Table 12-14 pp. 38-41). see also spectral irradiance. see also spectral radiance, radiometer, see SeaWiFS instrument, radiometric calibration, Vol.23. see also SeaWiFS instrument, radiometric profiles, 5(33-39). radiometric specifications, 3(36-37, Table Al p. 36); 8(4). references: cumulative, 6(5-9); 12(21-28); 18(38-46). CZCS data, 21(23-41). reflectance: gradients, 10(2-3); 19(Tables 6-7 p. 8, 8). plaque, 5(15-17); 14(5, 31, 41); 16(111). research: applications, 1(3-5). cruises, 3(30-32). round-robin, Vol.14; Vol.16. calibration, 8(4, 17, Table 4 p. 21); 12(4). protocols working group, 8(Table 1 p. 14); 18(Table 3 p. 7). see also calibration, round-robin. Science Team Meeting, Vol.8. abstracts, 8(22-41). agenda, 8(5-6). attendees, 8(51-59). executive committee, 8(22). invited presentations, 8(1-3). questionnaire, 8(19-22, 44-51). SeaBASS, Vol. 20. filearchitecture, 20(ci. 1). SEAPAK, 4(1-2, 20). SeaStar, 1(1, 3, 8); 2(1-2); 3(21); 10(3,7). launch sequence, l(Fig. 4 p. 9). operational system, l(Fig. 6 p. 10). orbital simulation parameters, 2(Table 1 p. 2); ll(Table 1 P.I). pitch rate, 10(7). satellite, l(Fig. 5 p. 9). spacecraft description, 1(8-10). SeaWiFS instrument, 1(1, 5-«, 8, 10-11); 4(1); 5(6, 9-14); 8(7-8, 17). absolute accuracy, 22(19-20). acceptance report, prelaunch, Vol. 22. acceptance testing, 8(4, 13-14, Table 4 p. 20). band co-registration, 22(10-11, Fig. 5 p.12, Tables 12-13 p. 12). band edge wavelengths, 23(51, Table 13 p. 52). band tolerances, 22(7-8, Tables 5-7 p. 9). bandwidths, l(Table 1 p. 1, Fig. 2 p. 2, 11). bilinear gains, 23(2, 4, Fig. 4 p. 5, Tables 1-4 p. 6, 6-7, Fig. 5 p. 8, 18). calibration and characterization, 3(Fig. 14 p. 18); 8(4). calibration constants, 23(17-18, Table 9 p. 19). calibration equations, 23(8-14, 18). characteristics, 2(Table 1 p. 2); 3(Table 2 p. 11, 13). cross-track scan, 22(4, Figs. 3-4 p. 6, 7). dark level, 22(7). description of, 1(10-11); 23(2, Figs. 1-3 pp. 3-4). dynamic range, 22(14, Tables 16-18 p. 17). field-of-view, 1(11); 5(1, 10, 12-18, 20-24, 28-29, 31, 38); 22(2, Fig. 1 p. 3, 4, Fig. 2 p. 5, Table 3 p. 4). fore-and-aft pointing, 22(7, Table 4 p. 7). 'gains, 22(18, Table 21 p. 19); 23(14-17). in-flight data, 22(29). launch time, 2(1). major milestones, 3(Table 7 p. 21); 22(Table 1 p. 2). mirror sides, 23(7-8, Table 5 p. 9). monitoring of, 1(18). 11

Original page 15

SeaWiFS Technical Report Series CumulativeIndex: Volumes 1-23 SeaWiFS instrument cont. MTF, 22(14, Tables 19-20 pp. 18-19). operations schedules, 1(17-18). SIRREX-2 cont. equipment and tests, 16(Table Al p. 117). participants, 16(Table Al p. 117). out-of-band response, 22(8, Tables 8-11 pp. 10-11); 23(51, SIRREX-3, 18(9, 13, 16). Table 14 p. 53). pointing knowledge, 22(24, 28). solar diffuser, 3(11, 13, 21, 23, 24, 38); 5(2, 17, 19, 22); 8(13, 36); Vol.10; 15(7, Table 8 p. 11, 27, Figs. 20-21 pp. 32-33); polarization, 22(12-14, Table 15 p. 13, Figs. 6-7 pp. 15-16). 17(13); 19(26-32, Figs. 11-12 p. 28); 23(9-10). radiometric calibration, Vol.23. scanner, 1(11, Fig. 7 p. 14). solar irradiance measurements, 3(Fig. 16 p. 22). solar observations, Vol. 10. sensitivities, 1(5, Fig. 3 p. 6); 5(Table 4 p. 11, 14); 22(11-12, see also calibration, Table 14 p. 13). spectral bands, 1(11); 9(1, Table 1 p.2). spectral characterization, Vol.23. spectral differences, 22(8, 10). spectral response, 23(21-43). stability and repeatability, 22(28-29). stray light response, 23(2, 13). system level response, 23(43-51). telemetry parameters, 3(Table 8 p. 23). temperature factors, 23(18-21). testing and design, 22(1-2). test plan summary, 3(Table 6 pp. 19-20). transient response, 22(18-19, Tables 22-23 p.20). vicarious calibration, 5(3-4, 33). see also optical instruments. see also solar diffuser. sensor: calibration, 5(2-3). characterization, 5(15-25); 9(Table 2 p.3); 15(13). CZCS, see CZCS. monitoring, 1(18). operations schedules, 1(17). ringing, 4(2). ringing mask, 13(2, 27, and Plate 19). saturation response, 15(13, 27-39). SeaWiFS, see SeaWiFS instrument. tilt, 15(Fig. 1 p.5). see also characterization. see also CZCS, ring mask comparison. see also SeaWiFS instrument. see also solar diffuser. ship shadow avoidance, 5(25-26). shunt, 16(111-116). tests, 14(41-42). SIRREX: database, 20(ch. 4). ' SBRC database, 20(ci. 5). see also SIRREX-1. see also SIRREX-2. SIRREX-1, Vol.14; 18(9). . attendees, 14(57-58). equipment and tests, 14(Table Bl p. 49). participants, 14(Table 1 p.4). validation process, 14(Fig. 1 p. 3). SIRREX-2, Vol.16; 18(9). attendees, 16(116-118). 12 solstice: see azimuth. see sun glint. see zenith, spectral bands, 1(1-2); 5(Table 2 p. 10, 17); 9(1, Table 1 p. 2); 15(Table la p. 2). spectral characterization, Vol.23. see also SeaWiFS instrument, spectral differences, see SeaWiFS instrument, spectral irradiance, 5(13, 16, 25-27); 8(25); 14(Figs. 2-5 pp. 8- 11, Figs. 7-14 pp. 20-27, Fig. 18 p. 43); 16(Figs. 2-5 pp. 6- 9, Tables 1-5 pp. 10-23, Figs. 6-16 pp. 25-35); 19(7). and radiance measurements, 3(2); 5(13, 16, 21-23, 25-27). calibration geometry, 14(Fig. B3 p. 50). see also lamps, spectral radiance, 5(21-23, 25-27); 8(25); 14(Figs. 16-17 pp. 36-37, 45-47, Fig. A2 p. 46, 47, 52, 55-56); 19(ch.4). spectral reflectance, 5(37, 38); 8(27, 29-30, 35, 49); 16(2-3, Table 20 pp. 112-113, Fig. 31 p. 114); 19(ch. 2). BSI sphere, 16(62, Fig. 22 p. 73, Table 14 pp. 79-81). CHORS sphere, 16(62, Figs. 23-27 pp. 74-78, Tables 15-16 pp. 82-90). calibration, 14(Fig. Al p.46). GSFC sphere, 16(36, Fig. 17 p. 45, Figs. 19-20 pp. 47-48, Tables 8-10 pp. 49-61, Fig. 21 p. 63, Tables 11-13 pp. 64-72, 118-119, Figs. Cl and C2 p. 119). NOAA sphere, 16(81, Table 19 pp. 106-109, Fig. 30 p. 110). UCSB sphere, 16(62, 81, Table 17 pp. 91-95, Fig. 28 p. 96). WFF sphere, 16(81, Table 18 pp. 97-103, Fig. 29 p. 104). see also sphere sources, spectral response, 23(21-43). sphere, Vol.14. calibration setup, 14(Fig. B5 p. 51, Fig. B9 p. 54). integrating, 5(15); 14(28-31, 45); 16(2); 19(ch.4); 23(13). measurements, 14(Table B8 p. 55). radiances, 14(Table B3 p. 49, Fig. B6 p. 51, Table B4 p. 52, Table B6 p. 52). source comparisons, 14(42-44). sources, 16(23-111); 19(25, 33). see also spectral reflectance. SPSWG, 1(1); 3(Table 5 p. 16, 27-28). stability tests, 14(42). standard data format, see format, standard data, storage: data sets, 19(Table 19 p. 44, Figs. 19-20 pp. 44-45, Table 20 p. 48); 20(Table 1 p. 9). stray light response, 15(Fig. 7 p. 14); 23(2, 13).

Original page 16

E.R. Firestone and S.B. Hooker summary, see index. validation cont. sun glint, 1(18); 2(1, 10, 14); 3(6, 34); 9(2, 4-5, 6, 7, 9); 15(3, 4, 21, 27). see also calibration. see also calibration and validation, at equinox, 2(10). viewing and solar geometries, 9(4-6); 13(3, 46). at solstice, 2(10, 16). visible radiometers, 7(1). flag sensitivity study, 13(ch. 9, and Plate 20). radiance distribution, 2(Fig. 8 p. 11, Fig. 11 p. 14). surface pressure, 8(4, 7); 13(Table 3 p. 16, Fig. 13 p. 17, 19-22, Tables 4-6 pp. 23-24, and Plates: 6-7, and 17). surface wind products, 19(ch. 8). voltmeter, 16(111-116). symbols: cumulative, 6(5); 12(18-20); 18(34-37). -T, Uwind: telemetry, 1(10, 14); 8(11); 9(1, 2, 7, Fig. 1 p. 8, 9); 10(1, Figs. 20-21 pp. 23-24, 25); 15(2, 13-20, Figs. 9-10 pp. 17- 18, Tables 12-13 pp. 19-20, Table 14 p. 21). transfer, Vol. 14. irradiance scale, 14(Table 2 pp. 6-7, Tables 4-7 pp. 14-19, see also AVHRR. see also CZCS. see also MODIS. see also SeaWiFS instrument, tests, 14(41-42). -W, X, Ysee surface wind products. see data sets, gridded wind. -Z- 28). zenith, 2(10). -Vvalidation, 19(9-20). algorithm, 8(16). product, 8(10, 16). sampling, 5(2, 31-33). see also algorithms. angles at equinox, 2(2, 16). angles at solstice, 2(10, 16). satellite angle, 13(15, 19, 46). solar angle, 2(2, Fig. 3 p. 5, 10, Fig. 9 p. 12, Fig. 12 p. 15, Table 3 p. 16, 16); 3(2, 8, 23); 7(1, 4); 9(Table 6 p.9); 13(Table 11 p. 29, 46). spacecraft angle, 2(2, Fig. 4 p. 6, 10, 16); 13(Table 11 p. 29). 13

Original page 17

SeaWiFS Technical Report Series Cumulative Index: Volumes 1-23 GLOSSARY -A- A/D Analog-to-Digital; also written as: AD A&M (Texas) Agriculture and Mechanics (University) AC Alternating Current ACC Antarctic Circumpolar Current BSIXR BSFs Transfer Radiometer BTR Bright Target Recovery BUV Backscatter Ultraviolet Spectrometer BWI Baltimore-Washington International (airport) -C- CalCoFI California Cooperative Fisheries Institute ACRIM Active Cavity Radiometer Irradiance Monitor Cal/Val Calibration and Validation ACS Attitude Control System ADC Analog-to-Digital Converter CALVAL Calibration and Validation Case-1 Water whose reflectance is determined solely by ADEOS Advanced Earth Observation Satellite (Japan) absorption. AE Angstrom Exponent Case-2 Water whose reflectance is significantly influ- ALSCAT ALPHA and Scattering Meter (Note: the sym- enced by scattering. the beam attenua- CCD Charge Coupled Device bol a corresponds to c(A), tion coefficient, in present usage). CCPO Center for Coastal Physical Oceanography (Old AM-1 Not an acronym, used to designate the morning Dominion University) platform of EOS. AMC Angular Momentum Compensation AOCI Airborne Ocean Color Imager AOL Airborne Oceanographic Lidar AOP Apparent Optical Property AOS/LOS Acquisition of Signal/Loss of Signed APL Applied Physics Laboratory CDF (NASA) Common Data Format CDOM Colored Dissolved Organic Material CD-ROM Compact Disk-Read Only Memory CDR Critial Design Review CEC Commission of the European Communities CENR Committee on Environment and Natural Resources ARGOS Not an acronym, but the name given to the CHORS Center for Hydro-Optics and Remote Sensing the (San Diego State University) data collection and location system on NOAA Operational Satellites. ARI Accelerated Research Initiative CICESE Centra de Investigation Cientifica y de Education Superior de Ensenada (Mexico) ASCII American Standard Code for Information In- CIRES Cooperative Institute for Research in Environterchange ASI Italian Space Agency ASR Absolute Spectral Response AT Along-Track AU Astronomical Unit AVHRR Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer mental Sciences GOADS Comprehensive Ocean-Atmosphere Data Set COOP Coastal Ocean Optics Program COTS Commercial Off-The-Shelf (software) CPR Continuous Plankton Recorder cpu Central Processing Unit AVIRIS Advanced Visible and Infrared Imaging Spec- CRM Contrast Reduction Meter trometer AXBT Airborne Expendable Bathythermograph -B- CRN Italian Research Council CRSEO Center for Remote Sensing and Environmental Optics (University of California at Santa Barbara) BAOPW-1 First Bio-optical Algorithm and Optical Proto- CRT Calibrated Radiance Tapes; or Cathode Ray cols Workshop Tube. BAOPW-2 Second Bio-optical Algorithm and Optical Pro- CRTT CZCS Radiation and Temperature Tape tocols Workshop CSIRO Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Re- BAOPW-3 Third Bio-optical Algorithm and Optical Pro- search Organization (of Australia) tocols Workshop BAOPW-4 Fourth Bio-optical Algorithm and Optical Protocols Workshop BAOPW-5 Fifth Bio-optical Algorithm and Optical Protocols Workshop BAS British Antarctic Survey BATS Bermuda Atlantic Time-Series Station BBOP Bermuda Bio-Optical Profiler BBR Band-to-Band Registration BCRS Dutch Remote Sensing Board BEP Benguela Ecology Programme BER Bit Error Rate CSC Computer Sciences Corporation CSL Computer Systems Laboratory CT Cross-Track CTD Conductivity, Temperature, and Depth CVT Calibration and Validation Team CW Continuous Wave CWR Clear Water Radiance CZCS Coastal Zone Color Scanner -D- DAAC Distributed Active Archive Center DAO Data Assimilation Office and Technology (Ger- DARR-1 First Data Analysis Round-Robin BMFT Minister for Research many) BOFS British Ocean Flux Study BOMS Bio-Optical Moored Systems bpi bits per inch . DARR-2 Second Data Analysis Round-Robin DAT Digital Audio Tape DC Direct Current DCF Data Capture Facility BRDF Bidirectional Reflectance Distribution Function DCOM Dissolved Colored Organic Material BSI Biospherical Instruments, Incorporated 14 DCP Data Collection Platform

Original page 18

E.R. Firestone and S.B. Hooker DEC Digital Equipment Corporation DMS dimethyl sulfide DOC Dissolved Organic Carbon DoD Department of Defense DOM Dissolved Organic Matter DOS Disk Operating System DSP Not an acronym, but an image display and analysis package developed at RSMAS University of Miami. DU Dobson Units DXW Not an acronym, but a lamp designator. -E- E-mail Electronic Mail EAFB Edwards Air Force Base ECEF Earth-Centered Earth-Fixed ECMWF European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts ECT Equator Crossing Time EOT Eastern Daylight Time EEZ Exclusive Economic Zone ENSO El Nino Southern Oscillation ENVISAT Environmental Satellite EOF Empirical Orthogonal Function EOS Earth Observing System EOSAT Earth Observation Satellite Company EOSDIS EOS Data Information System EPA Environmental Protection Agency EP-TOMS Earth Probe-Total Ozone Mapping Spectroradiometer EqPac Equatorial Pacific (Process Study) ER-2 Earth Resources-2 ERBE Earth Radiation Budget Experiment ERBS Earth Radiation Budget Sensor ERL (NOAA) Environmental Research Laboratories ERS Earth Resources Satellite ESA European Space Agency EST Eastern Standard Time EURASEP European Association of Scientists in Environmental Pollution EUVE Extreme Ultraviolet Explorer -F- FASCAL Fast Calibration (Facility) FDDI Fiber Data Distribution Interface FEL Not an acronym, but a lamp designator. FGGE First GARP Global Experiment FLUPAC (Geochemical) Fluxes in the Pacific (Ocean) FNOC Fleet Numerical Oceanography Center FORTRAN Formula Translation (computer language) FOV Field-of-View FPA Focal Point Assembly FRD Federal Republic of Deutschland (Germany) FTP File Transfer Protocol FWHM Full-Width at Half-Maximum FY Fiscal Year -G- GAC Global Area Coverage, coarse resolution satellite data with a nominal ground resolution at nadir of approximately 4 km. GARP Global Atmospheric Research Program GASM General Angle Scattering Meter GF/F Not an acronym; a specific type of glass fiber filter manufactured by Whatman GIN Greenland, Iceland, and Norwegian Seas GISS Goddard Institute for Space Studies GLI Global Imager GLOBEC Global Ocean Ecosystems dynamics GMT Greenwich Mean Time GOES Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite GOFS Global Ocean Flux Study GOMEX Gulf of Mexico Experiment GP Global Processing (algorithm) GPM General Perturbations Model GPS Global Positioning System GRGS Groupe de Recherche de Geodesic Spatial GRIB Gridded Binary GRIDTOMS Gridded TOMS (data set) GSFC Goddard Space Flight Center GSO Graduate School of Oceanography (University of Rhode Island) G/T System Gain/Total System Noise Temperature GUI Graphical User Interface -H- HDF Hierarchical Data Format HEI Hoffman Engineering, Incorporated HeNe Helium-Neon HHCRM Hand-Held Contrast Reduction Meter HIRIS High Resolution Imaging Spectrometer HN (Polaroid) Not an acronym; a linear sheet polarizer used to check the polarization sensitivity of bands 7 and 8. HOTS Hawaiian Optical Time Series HP Hewlett Packard HPGL Hewlett Packard Graphics Language HPLC High Performance Liquid Chromatography HQ Headquarters HR (Polaroid) Not an acronym; a linear sheet polarizer used to check the polarization sensitivity of bands 1-6. HRPT High Resolution Picture Transmission HST Hawaii Standard Time HYDRA Hydrographic Data Reduction and Analysis -I- I/O Input/Output IAPSO International Association for the Physical Sciences of the Ocean IAU International Astrophysical Union IBM International Business Machines ICD Interface Control Document ICES International Council on Exploration of the Seas IDL Interactive Data Language IFOV Instantaneous Field-of-View IMS Information Management System IOP Inherent Optical Property IP Internet Protocol IPD Image Processing Division IR Infrared ISCCP International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project ISIC Integrating Sphere Irradiance Collector ISTP International Solar Terrestrial Program IUCRM Inter-Union Commission on Radio Meteorology IUE International Ultraviolet Explorer 15

Original page 19

SeaWiFS Technical Report Series Cumulative Index: Volumes 1-23 -J- JAM JYACC Application Manager JARE Japanese Antarctic Research Expedition JGOFS Joint Global Ocean Flux Study JHU Johns Hopkins University JOI Joint Oceanographic Institute JPL Jet Propulsion Laboratory JRC Joint Research Center -K, L- L&N Leeds & Northrup LAC Local Area Coverage, fine resolution satellite data with a nominal ground resolution at nadir of approximately 1 km. LANDSAT Land Resources Satellite LDEO Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory (Columbia University) LDGO Lamon-Doherty Geological Observatory (Columbia University) LDTNLR Local Dynamic Threshold Nonlinear Raleigh Level-0 Raw data. Level-1 Calibrated radiances. Level-2 Derived products. Level-3 Gridded and averaged derived products. LMCE Laboratoire de Modelisation du climat et de ['Environment (France) LOC Local Time LODYC Laboratoire d'Oc£anographie et de Dynamique du climat (France) LOICZ Land Ocean Interaction in the Coastal Zone LPCM Laboratoire de Physique et Chimie Marines (France) LRER Long-Range Ecological Research LSB Least Significant Bits LSF Line Spread Function -M- MAREX Marine Resources Experiment Program MARS Multispectral Airborne Radiometer System MASSS Multi-Agency Ship-Scheduling for SeaWiFS MBARI Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute MEM Maximum Entropy Method MER Marine Environmental Radiometer MERIS Medium Resolution Imaging Spectrometer METEOSAT Meteorological Satellite MF Major Frame mF Minor Frame MIPS Millions of Instructions Per Second MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology MIZ Marginal Ice Zone MLE Maximum Likelihood Estimator MLML Moss Landing Marine Laboratory (San Jose State University) MO Magneto-Optical MOBY Marine Optical Buoy MOCE Marine Optical Characterization Experiment MODARCH MODIS Document Archive MODIS Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer MODIS-N Nadir-viewing MODIS instrument MODIS-T Tilted MODIS instrument to minimize sun glint MOS Marine Optical Spectroradiometer MOU Memorandum of Understanding MSB Most Significant Bits MS/DOS MicroSoft/Disk Operating System MTF Modulation Transfer Function 16 -N- NABE North Atlantic Bloom Experiment NAS National Academy of Science NASA National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASCOM NASA Communications NASDA National Space Development Agency (Japan) NASIC NASA Aircraft/Satellite Instrument Calibration NAVSPASUR Naval Space Surface Surveillance NCAR National Center for Atmospheric Research NCCOSC Navy Command, Control, and Ocean Surveillance Center NCDC (NOAA) National Climatic Data Center NCOS NASA Climate Data System NCSA National Center for Supercomputing Applications NCSU North Carolina State University NDBC National Data Buoy Center NDVI Normalized Difference Vegetation Index NEdL Noise Equivalent Differential Spectral Radiance NEAT Noise Equivalent Delta Temperature NE<5L Noise Equivalent delta Radiance NER Noise Equivalent Radiance NERC Natural Environment Research Council NESDIS National Environmental Satellite Data Information Service NESS National Environmental Satellite Service NET NIMBUS Experiment Team netCDF (NASA) Network Common Data Format NFS Network File System NGDC National Geophysical Data Center NIMBUS Not an acronym, but a series of NASA experimental weather satellites containing a widevariety of atmosphere, ice, and ocean sensors. NIST National Institute of Standards and Technology NMC National Meteorological Center NMFS National Marine Fisheries Service NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOARL Naval Oceanographic and Atmospheric Research Laboratory NODC National Oceanographic Data Center NORAD North American Air Defense (Command) NOPS NIMBUS Observation Processing System NOS National Ocean Service NRA NASA Research Announcement NRaD Naval Research and Development NRIFSF National Research Institute of Far Seas Fisheries (Japan) NRL Naval Research Laboratory NRT Near-Real Time NSCAT NASA Scatterometer NSF National Science Foundation NSSDC National Space Science Data Center -O- OAM Optically Active Materials OCDM Ocean Color Data Mission OCEAN Ocean Colour European Archive Network OCS Ocean Color Scanner OCTS Ocean Color Temperature Sensor (Japan)

Original page 20

E.R. Firestone and S.B. Hooker ODAS Ocean Data Acquisition System ODEX Optical Dynamics Experiment ODU Old Dominion University OFFI Optical Free-Fail Instrument OI Original Irradiance OLIPAC Oligotrophy in the Pacific (Ocean) OMEX Ocean Marine Exchange ONR Office of Naval Research OPT Ozone Processing Team OS Operating System OSC Orbital Sciences Corporation OSFI Optical Surface Floating Instrument OSSA Office of Space Science and Applications OSU Oregon State University -P- PAR Photosynthetically Available Radiation PC (IBM) Personal Computer PDR Preliminary Design Review PDT Pacific Daylight Time PFF Programmable Frame Formatter PI Principal Investigator PIKE Phased Illuminated Knife Edge PM-1 Not an acronym, used to designate the afternoon. PMEL Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory PML Plymouth Marine Laboratory POC Particulate Organic Carbon POLDER Polarization Detecting Environmental Radiometer (France) or Polarization and Directionality of the Earth's Reflectances (depending on usage). PON Particulate Organic Nitrogen PR Photo Research PRIME Plankton Reactivity in the Marine Environment PST Pacific Standard Time PSU Practical Salinity Units PTFE Polytetrafluoroethylene PUR Photosynthetically Usable Radiation -Q- QC Quality Control QED Quantum Efficient Device -R- R&A Research and Applications R&D Research and Development R/V Research Vessel -S- S/C Spacecraft S/N Serial Number SAC Satellite Applications Centre SARSAT Search and Rescue Satellite SBRC (Hughes) Santa Barbara Research Center SBUV Solar Backscatter Ultraviolet Radiometer SBUV-2 Solar Backscatter Ultraviolet Radiometer-2 SCADP SeaWiFS Calibration and Acceptance Data Package SCOR Scientific Committee on Oceanographic Research SDPS SeaWiFS Data Processing System SDS Scientific Data Set SDSU San Diego State University SeaBASS SeaWiFS Bio-Optical Archive and Storage System SEAPAK Not an acronym, but an image display and analysis package developed at GSFC. SeaSCOPE SeaWiFS Study of Climate, Ocean Productivity, and Environmental Change SeaWiFS Sea-viewing Wide Field-of-view Sensor SES Shelf Edge Study SGI Silicon Graphics, Incorporated SI Systeme International d' Unites or International System of Units SIG Special Interest Group SIO Scripps Institution of Oceanography SIO/MPL Scripps Institution of Oceanography/Marine Physical Laboratory SIRREX SeaWiFS Intercalibration Round-Robin Experiment SIRREX-1 The First SIRREX (July 1992) SIRREX-2 The Second SIRREX (June 1993) SIRREX-3 The Third SIRREX (September 1994) SIS Spherical Integrating Source SISSR Submerged In Situ Spectral Radiometer SJSU San Jose State University SMM Solar Maximum Mission SNR Signal-to-Noise Ratio SO Southern Ocean (algorithm) SOC Simulation Operations Center SOGS SeaStar Operations Ground Subsystem SOH State of Health SOW Statement of Work SPM Suspended Particulate Material or Special Perturbations Model (depending on usage). SPO SeaWiFS Project Office RACER Research on Antarctic Coastal Ecosystem Rates SPOT Satellite Pour I'Observation de la Terre RDBMS Relational Database Management System RDF Radio Direction Finder RF Radio Frequency RFP Request for Proposals RISC Reduced Instruction Set Computer rms root mean squared ROSIS Remote Sensing Imaging Spectrometer, also known as the Reflective Optics System Imaging Spectrometer (Germany) RR Round-Robin RSMAS Rosenstiel School for Marine and Atmospheric Sciences (University of Miami) RSS Remote Sensing Systems (Inc.) RTOP Research and Technology Operation Plan (France) SPSWG SeaWiFS Prelaunch Science Working Group SQL Sequential Query Language SRC Satellite Receiving Station (NERC) SRT Sigma Research Technology, Incorporated SSM/I Special Sensor for Microwave/Imaging SST Sea Surface Temperature or SeaWiFS Science Team (depending on usage). ST Science Team STM Science Team Member SUN Sun Microsystems SWAP Sylter Wattenmeer Austausch-prozesse SWG Science Working Group SXR SeaWiFS Transfer Radiometer 17

Original page 21

SeaWiFS Technical Report Series Cumulative Index: Volumes 1-23 -T- T-S Temperature-Salinity TAB Transportable Applications Executive TAO Thermal Array for the Ocean or more recently, Tropical Atmosphere-Ocean TBD To Be Determined TBUS Not an acronym, but a NOAA orbit prediction TDI Time-Delay and Integration TDRSS Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System TIROS Television Infrared Observation Satellite TLM Telemetry TM Technical Memorandum TOA Top of the Atmosphere TOGA Tropical Ocean Global Atmosphere program TOMS Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer TOPEX Topography Experiment TOYS TIROS Operational Vertical Sounder TRMM Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission TSM Total Suspended Material TV Thermal Vacuum -U- UA University of Arizona UARS Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite UAXR University of Arizona's Transfer Radiometer UCAR University Consortium for Atmospheric Research UCMBO University of California Marine Bio-Optics UCSB University of California at Santa Barbara UCSD University of California at San Diego UH University of Hawaii UIM/X User Interface Management/X-Windows UM University of Miami UNESCO United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organizations UNIX Not an acronym, a computer operating system. UPS Uninterruptable Power System 18 URJ University of Rhode Island USC University of Southern California USF University of South Florida UTM Universal Transverse Mercator (projection) UV Ultraviolet UVB Ultraviolet-B UWG User Working Group -V- VO Version 0 VI Version 1 VAX Virtual Address Extension VCS Version Control Software VDC Volts Direct Current VHP Very High Frequency VI Virtual Instrument VISLAB Visibility Laboratory (Scripps Institution of Oceanography) VISNIR Visible and Near Infrared VMS Virtual Memory System VSF Volume Scattering Function -W- WFF Wallops Flight Facility WHOI Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute WMO World Meteorological Organization WOCE World Ocean Circulation Experiment WORM Write-Once Read-Many (times) WVS World Vector Shoreline -X- XDR External Data Representation -Y, Z- YBOM Yamato Bank Optical Mooring

Original page 22

E.R. Firestone and S.B. Hooker SYMBOLS -Aa The semi-major axis of the Earth's orbit, a formulation constant, a constant equal to 0.983, a constant equal to —20/tanh(2) or an exponential value in the expression relating the radiance of scattered light to wavelength (depending on usage). a(z, A) Spectral absorption coefficient. o< Oxygen absorption coefficient. aox Coefficient for oxygen absorption. a0z Coefficient for ozone absorption. awv Coefficient for water vapor absorption. Ao Coefficient for the linear term in the scan modulation correction equation. Ad The detector aperture. Af The foam reflectance. Ai The intersection area. A(k) Absorptivity. A() Coefficient for calculating 6&(A). -Bb Formulation coefficient or a constant equal to 1/3 (depending on usage). b(z, A) Total scattering coefficient. b(0, z, Ao) Volume scattering coefficient. 6(,(z, A) Spectral backscattering coefficient. &6C(A) Spectral backscattering coefficient for phytoplankton. &r(A) Total Raman scattering coefficient. bw() Total scattering coefficient for pure seawater. 61 (fc) Input data for polarization calculations for SeaWiFS band 1. 67(fc) Input data for polarization calculations for SeaWiFS band 7. B Excess target radiance. BO Coefficient for the power term in the scan modulation correction equation. B(A) Coefficient for calculating &t(A). -Cc(z, A) Spectral beam attenuation coefficient . c(z,660) Fled beam attenuation (at 660 nm). [chl. a/K Concentration of chlorophyll o over K, the diffuse attenuation coefficient. C Chlorophyll a pigment, or just pigment concentration. C\ Measured value for the flight diffuser on a given scan line, in counts. C\3 Pigment concentration derived using CZCS bands 1 and 3. €2 Measured value of the flight diffuser for the scan line immediately sequential to the first scan line used to measure the flight diffuser, i.e., Si, in counts. CM Pigment concentration derived using CZCS bands 2 and 3. Cdark Instrument dark restore value, in counts. Cext Average total extinction cross-section of a particle. CF The calibration factor. C70ut Instrument output, in counts. Cref Reference chlorophyll value (0.5). C"temp Temperature sensor output, in counts, represented by an 8-bit digital word in the SeaStar telemetry. [C + P] Pigment concentration defined as mg chlorophyll o 3 plus phaeopigments m~ . -Dd The distance between source and detector apertures. di Distance from the ith observation point to the point of interest. dj Distance from the j'th observation point to the point of interest. d(/(A)) An increment in detector current. d\ An increment in wavelength. ds Detector configuration datum. D Sequential day of the year. D Orbit position difference vector. Z)at Along-track position difference. Dct Cross-track position difference. £>rad Radial position difference. DC Digital count (value) or direct current (depending on usage). Digital counts at 10-bit digitization. The digital counts measured unshadowed. The digital counts due to scattered sunlight. DCroA The digital counts measured at the top of the atmosphere. -Ee Orbit eccentricity of the Earth. E() Spectral irradiance. Eo.() Irradiance in air. F/beg Beginning irradiance value. F/cai Calibration source irradiance. Ed Incident downwelling irradiance. Fd(0~,A) Incident spectral irradiance. Ed(z,X) Downwelled spectral irradiance. Fend Ending irradiance value. Fmeas(A) Measured radiance. F/ref(A) Reference radiance. F/S(A) Surface irradiance. Frem Percentage of energy removed from a wavelength band. Fsky(A) Spectral sky irradiance distribution. ESun(z, A) Spectral sun irradiance distribution. Eu(z,) Upwelled spectral irradiance. Ew(z, A) Irradiance in water. -F- / The fraction of the surface covered by foam. ft Filter number, i=0-ll. /-ratio The ratio of new to total production. F Arithmetic average. F(A) A mean conversion factor. F(A) Calibration factor. F(A) A conversion factor to convert PR714 readings to the GSFC sphere radiance scale. F(A) Average of calibration factors. Fo Extraterrestrial irradiance corrected for Earth-sun distance. Fo The scalar value of the solar spectral irradiance at the top of the atmosphere, multiplied by a columnar matrix of the four Stokes parameters (1/2, 1/2, 0, 0). Fo Mean solar irradiance. FO Extraterrestrial irradiance corrected for the atmosphere. _Fo(A) Mean extraterrestrial spectral irradiance. Fo(A) Mean extraterrestrial irradiance. 19

Original page 23

SeaWiFS Technical Report Series Cumulative Index: Volumes 1-23 Fa Forward scattering probability of the aerosol. K(490) Diffuse attenuation coefficient of seawater measured Fd The total flux incident on the surface if it did not at 490 nm. reflect light. Ko(A) Diffuse attenuation coefficient at z = 0. F'd The total flux incident on the surface, corrected for KI Primary instrument sensitivity factor. surface reflection. KI Gain factor. TF'd The scalar value of the total flux incident on the Ks Temperature dependence of detector output. surface, corrected for surface reflection, multiplied KH Scan modulation correction factor. by a columnar matrix of the four Stokes parameters. KS Spacecraft analog to digital conversion factor. Fi A correction factor. -Ggi A constant equal to 0.82. </2 A constant equal to —0.55. gs Gain selection datum. G Gain factor. Gi Gain setting 1. G2 Gain setting 2. Gs Gain setting 3. G4 Gain setting 4. 1 G(A) Ra(\i)/Ra(670) = (670/A) T2r(670)/T2r(Ai). Kg Analog-to-digital offset in spacecraft conversion. K7 Current from the diode at 20° C. KC(X) Attenuation coefficients for phytoplankton. KB (A) Attenuation coefficient downwelled irradiance. Kg() Attenuation coefficients for Gelbstoff. KL(Z,) Attenuation coefficient upwelled radiance. Kw() Attenuation coefficients for pure seawater. -L- L(A) Spectral radiance. L(Am) The radiance of a calibration sphere at the nominal peak wavelength of a filter. 3 Ge Gravitational constant of the Earth (398,600.5 km L(z,0,) Submerged upwelled radiance distribution. Gn Gain factor at gain setting n. -H- LO The radiance of the atmosphere. La Aerosol radiance. LC(A) Cloud radiance threshold. Lcai Calibration source radiance. Residual values without the calculated sinusoidal re- L<j A matrix of the four Stokes parameters for radiance h(k) sponse. HGMT GMT in hours. HM The measured moon irradiance. H, Altitude of the spacecraft (for SeaStar 705km). -Ii Inclination single or interval index (depending on usage). i' Inclination angle minus 90°. / Rayleigh intensity, /o Surface downwelling irradiance. /i Radiant intensity after traversing through an absorbing medium. /2 Reflected radiant energy received by the satellite sensor, /max Recorded maximum instrument output in response to linearly polarized light, incident on the surface. Z/cioud Maximumradiance from reflected light off of clouds. L9(A) Sun glint radiance. L,(A) Spectral radiance for run number i, or radiance, where i may represent any of the following: m for measured; LU for look-up table; 0 for light scattered by the atmosphere; sfc for reflection from the sea surface; and w for water-leaving radiance. LLU The radiance calculated for the look-up tables. Lm The radiance of the ocean-atmosphere system measured at a satellite. LM The radiance of the moon. Lmax Maximum saturation radiance. Measured radiance at nadir. Noise equivalent radiance. Lr(A) Rayleigh radiance. Lro(A) Rayleigh radiance at standard atmospheric pressure, Recorded minimum instrument output in response PO- /min to linearly polarized light. /(A) Detector current. ICS Current from the current source diode. -Jj Interval index. J2 The J2 gravity field term (0.0010863). J3 The J3 gravity field term (-0.0000254). J4 The J4 gravity field term (-0.0000161). J5 The J5 gravity field term. -Kk Wavenumber of light (I/A). Jfci Beginning wavenumber. ki Ending wavenumber. LS(A) Subsurface water radiance. LJO LO + Lsfc. L3at (A) Saturation radiance for the sensor. L8can Measured radiance at any pixel in a scan. Lsfc The radiance of the light reflected from the sea surface. Lsfc The columnar matrix of the four Stokes parameters (Lu,l, Lu,2, Lu,3, Lu,4). L8ky(A) Spectral sky radiance distribution. Lt(A) Total radiance at the sensor. Ltypicai Expected radiance from the ocean measured on orbit. LU(2,A) Upwelled spectral radiance. Lup The columnar matrix of light leaving the surface containing the values Lup,i, Lup,2, Lupj3, and Lup,4. LUp,i The RADTRAN radiance parameters (for i = 1,4). fec(A) Spectral fit coefficient weighted over the SeaWiFS Lw The water-leaving radiance of light scattered from bands; k'c(X) also used. K(z, A) Diffuse attenuation coefficient. 20 beneath the surface and penetrating it. Lw(443) Water-leaving radiance at 443 nm.

Original page 24

E.R. Firestone and S.B. Hooker Lw(520) Water-leaving radiance at 520nm. Lw(550) Water-leaving radiance at 550 nm. Lw(670) Water-leaving radiance at 670 nm. L™ The scalar value of the water-leaving radiance multiplied by a columnar matrix of the four Stokes parameters. Lww(A) Normalized water-leaving radiance. LS\ Measured radiance for mirror side 1. L52 Measured radiance for mirror side 2. -Mm Index of refraction. M Path length through the atmosphere. M'm The corrected mean orbit anomaly of the Earth, which is a function of date, and refers to an imaginary moon in a circular orbit. Moz Path length for ozone transmittance. -Nn The index of refraction, the mean orbital motion in revolutions per day, or the gain setting (depending on usage). n(A) An exponent conceptually similar to the Angstrom exponent. TI™ (A) Index of refraction of water. N The total number of something. ND The compensation factor for a 4 log neutral density filter. N Total number density. Ni Total number density of either the first or second aerosol model when i = 1 or 2, respectively. -O- 6 PxV. -P- Pa A factor to account for the probability of scattering to the spacecraft for three different paths from the sun. p0/(47r) Aerosol albedo of the scattering phase function. pw The probability of seeing sun glitter in the direction 0, $ given the sun in position OQ, 3>oas a function of wind speed (W). P Nodal period, phaeopigment concentration or local surface pressure (depending on usage). P Orbit position vector. + P(ff ) Phase function for forward scattering. P(0~) Phase function for backward scattering. PO Standard atmospheric pressure (1,013.25mb). Pa Probability of scattering to the spacecraft. Pi PR714 raw radiance. .PCT Phaeopigment concentration. PF Polarization factor. Pxl Pixel number, i.e., the numerical designation of a pixel in a scan line. -Qq Water transmittance factor. Q(A) ", A) relation factor (theoretically equal to TT). -Rr Water-air reflectance for totally diffuse irradiance. r\ The radius of circle one or source aperture (depending on usage). 1*2 The radius of circle two or detector aperture (depending on usage). ri The geometric mean radii of either the first or second aerosol model when i = 1 or 2, respectively. R Reflectance. M The reflection matrix. 2 R The square of the linear correlation coefficient. R(0~, A) Irradiance reflectance just below the sea surface. RI Multiplier for mirror side 1. #2 Multiplier for mirror side 2. Ra Aerosol reflectance. Ra Ra/(qT2r). Re Mean Earth radius (6,378.137 km). RE Effective resistance for the thermistor-resistor pair. RL(Z,) Spectral reflectance. Rr Rayleigh reflectance. Rr, Remote sensing reflectance. R, Subsurfacereflectance. Rt Total reflectance at the sensor. Rt (Rt- Rr)/(qT2T). RT Resistance of the thermistor. Rz Sunspot number. -Ss The reflectance of the atmosphere for isotropic radiance incident at its base. s(A) Slope for the range 0-1,023. S Solar constant. Si Initial detector signal. Sn Detector signal with gain. S(A) L0(A)/La(670). -T, Ut Time variable or the transmission of Lsfc through the atmosphere (depending on usage). t' The transmission of Lw through the atmosphere. t(k) Spectral transmission as a function of wavenumber. t(A) Diffuse transmittance of the atmosphere, to The sum of the direct and diffuse transmission of sunlight through the atmosphere. t\ First observation time. <2 Second observation time, to Initial time. toa Aerosol transmittance after absorption. fas Aerosol transmittance after scattering. td Direct component of transmittance after absorption by the gaseous components of the atmosphere, scattering and absorption by aerosols, and scattering by Rayleigh. te Time difference in hours between present position and most recent equator crossing, tec Equator crossing time. toz Transmittance after absorption by ozone. tr Transmittance after Rayleigh scattering. ts Diffuse component of transmittance after absorption by the gaseous components of the atmosphere, scattering and absorption by aerosols, and scattering by Rayleigh. twv Transmittance after absorption by water vapor. 21

Original page 25

SeaWiFS Technical Report Series Cumulative Index: Volumes 1-23 T Tilt position. T(A) The transmittance along the slant path to the sun. Ta() Transmittance through the surface. T(,0) Total transmittance (direct plus diffuse) from the ocean through the atmosphere to the spacecraft 8 The great circle distance from 9,(to) to \ts(t — to), the departure of each individual conversion factor from the mean, a relative difference, or the absorption coefficient (depending on usage). A/c Equivalent bandwidth. along the path determined by the spacecraft zenith AI/w(670) The error in the water-leaving radiance for the red angle 0. Tbr Two-way diffuse transmittance for Rayleigh attenuation. To(A,#o) Total downward transmittance of irradiance. Te Equation of time. Tox Transmittance of oxygen (02). Toz Transmittance of ozone (Oa). TS(A) Transmittance through the surface. Tw() Transmittance through a water path. Twv Transmittance of water vapor (H2O). -V- V Orbit velocity vector. Vi(tj) The ith spatial location at observation time t,. VM The radiance detector voltage while viewing the moon. Vs The irradiance detector voltage while viewing the sun. VT Focal plane temperature sensor voltage output. -W- W Wind speed. Wd Direct irradiance divided by the total irradiance at the surface. Wa Diffuse irradiance divided by the total irradiance. -Xx Abscissa or longitudinal coordinate, or the pixel number within a scan line (depending on usage). X ECEF x component of orbit position. X ECEF X component of orbit velocity. -Yy Ordinate or meridional coordinate. Y ECEF y component of orbit position. Y ECEF Y component of orbit velocity. -Z- Z ECEF z component of orbit position. Z ECEF Z component of orbit velocity. - GREEK - Q Percent albedo, tilt angle, formulation coefficient (intercept), the power constant in the Angstrom formulation, or the exponential value in the expression relating the extinction coefficient to wavelength (depending on usage). (3, A formulation coefficent (slope) or a constant in the Angstrom formulation (depending on usage). 0i The extinction coefficient of either the first or second aerosol model when i = 1 or 2, respectively. f3(z, A, ff) Spectral volume scattering function. 7 The Angstrom exponent. 7(A) The ratio of the aerosol optical thickness at wavelength A to the aerosol optical thickness at 670nm. 22 channel. ApCC<2 Partial pressure difference of CC>2 between air and sea water. AP The difference in successive pixels or the pressure deviation from standard pressure, PO(depending on usage). At Time difference. AT(A) The error in transmittance. A0a The error (in radians) in the knowledge of 6a. AA An interval in wavelength. Apu,(A) The error in the water-leaving reflectance for the red channel. Acr(A) The absolute error in spectral optical depth. ATQ The error in the aerosol optical thickness. ACJ The longitude difference from the sub-satellite point to the pixel. Auis Longitude difference. 77 Bearing from the sub-satellite point to the pixel along the direction of motion of the satellite. 0 Spacecraft zenith angle, spacecraft pitch, or polar angle of the line-of-sight at a spacecraft (depending on usage). 0 Pitch rate. Go Polar angle of the direct sunlight. 01 The intersection angle of circle one. 02 The intersection angle of circle two. 0o Solar zenith angle. 0n The zenith angle of the vector normal to the surface vector for which glint will be observed. ON The angle with respect to nadir that the sea surface slopes to produce a reflection angle to the spacecraft. 0, Scan angle of sensor or the solar zenith angle (depending on usage). 0', Scan angle of sensor adjusted for tilt. 2 1 K An integration constant: K = Advrr^ri+rl+d )" . A Wavelength of light. Ai Starting wavelength. A2 Ending wavelength. Am Nominal center wavelength. p. Mean value or cosine of the satellite zenith angle (depending on usage). Ho Cosine of the solar zenith angle. + Jld(0 ,X) Spectral mean cosine for downwelling radiance at the sea surface. \i, The reciprocal of the effective optical length to the top of the atmosphere, along the line of sight to the sun. Vj The jth temporal weighting factor. The distance between the Earth and the moon.

Original page 26

E.R. Firestone and S.B. Hooker p The FVesnel reflectivity, the weighted direct plus diffuse reflectance, or the average reflectance of the sea (depending on usage). FYesnel reflectance for viewing geometry. p(0o) FVesnel reflectance for solar geometry. Pc,i Reflectance of clouds and ice. Pn Sea surface reflectance for direct irradiance at normal incidence for a flat sea. Pi The reflectance of the sea of either the first or second aerosol model when i = 1 or 2, respectively. Pi (A) The reflectance where i may represent any of the following: m for measured; LU for look-up table; o for light scattered by the atmosphere; sfc for reflection from the sea surface; and w for water-leaving radiance. PN Reflectance for diffuse irradiance. a One standard deviation of a set of data values. 2 <7 The mean square surface slope distribution. er(A) The spectral optical depth. 2 - - - r(z, A) Spectral optical depth. TO. Aerosol optical thickness. Oxygen optical thickness at 750 nm. The optical thickness of ozone. Rayleigh optical thickness weighted by the SeaWiFS spectral response. T3(A) Spectral solar atmospheric transmission. TWv The absorption optical thickness of water vapor. Azimuth angle of the line-of-sight at a spacecraft. o Azimuth angle of the direct sunlight. $ Spacecraft azimuth angle or roll (depending on us- $ Roll rate. The detector solid angle. The solid angle subtended by the moon at the measuring instrument. Solar azimuth angle. Pixel latitude or yaw (depending on usage) . Yaw rate. Solar declination latitude. Sub-satellite latitude as a function of time. ui Longitude variable or the surface reflection angle (depending on usage). wo Old longitude value. ida Single scattering albedo of the aerosol. Rayleigh optical thickness (due to scattering by the (jje Equator crossing longitude. TV standard molecular atmosphere). Pressure corrected Rayleigh optical thickness. Rayleigh optical thickness at standard atmospheric pressure, PQ. <jJi Spatial weighting factor. ui. Longitude variable. fZ Solar hour angle or the amount of ozone in Dobson units (depending on usage). 23

Original page 27

SeaWiFS Technical Report Series Cumulative Index: Volumes 1-23 REFERENCES -A- Abbott, M.R., and P.M. Zion, 1985: Satellite observations of phytoplankton variability during an upwelling event. Cont. Shelf Res., 4, 661-680. , and D.B. Chelton, 1991: Advances in passive remote sensing of the ocean. U.S. National Report to the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics 1987-1990, Contributions in Oceanography, Am. Geophys. Union, Washington, DC, 571-589. Abel, P., G.R. Smith, R.H. Levin, and H. Jacobowitz, 1988: Results from aircraft measurements over White Sands, New Mexico, to calibrate the visible channels of spacecraft instruments. SPIE, 924, 208-214. , B.^Guenther, R. Galimore, and J. Cooper, 1993: Calibration results for NOAA-11 AVHRR channels 1 and 2 from congruent aircraft observations. J. Atmos. and Ocean. Technol., 10, 493-508. Ahmad,.Z., and R.S. Fraser, 1982: An iterative radiative transfer code for ocean-atmosphere systems. J. Atmos. Sci., 39, 656-665. Allen, C.W., 1973: Astrophysical Quantities, 3rd Edition. Athalone Press London, 310pp. Andersen J.H., 1991: CZCS level-2 generation. OCEAN Technical Series, Nos. 1-8, Ocean Colour European Archive Network, 49pp. U.S. Balch, W.M., 1993: Reply. J. Geophys. Res., 98, 16,585-16,587. Anderson, R.F., 1992: Southern Ocean processes study. JGOFS Planning Report Number 16, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts, 114pp. Andre, J.-M. and A. Morel, 1989: Simulated effects of barometric pressure and ozone content upon the estimate of marine phytoplankton from space. J. Geophys. Res., 94, 1,029-1,037. and 1991: Atmospheric corrections and interpretation of marine radiances in CZCS imagery, revisited. Oceanol Acta, 14, 3-22. -, and T.J. Petzold, 1975: An instrument for the measurement of spectral attenuation coefficient and narrow-angle volume scattering function of ocean waters. Visibility Laboratory of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography Report, SIO Ref. 75-25, 12pp. -, and G. Halikas, 1976: The index of refraction of seawater. SIO Ref. 76-1, Vis. Lab., Scripps Inst. of Oceanogr., La Jolla, California, 64pp. -, and T.J. Petzold, 1981: The determination of diffuse attenuation coefficient of sea water using the Coastal Zone Color Scanner. Oceanography from Space, J.F.R. Gower, Ed., Plenum Press, 239-256. -, and B.L. McGlamery, 1983: Passive remote sensing of ocean optical propagation parameters. 32nd Symp., AGARD Electromagnetic Wave Propagation Panel on Propagation Factors Affecting Remote Sensing by Radio Waves, Oberammergau, Germany, 45-1-45-10. -B- Baker, K.S., and R.C. Smith, 1982: Bio-optical classification and model of natural waters, 2. Limnol. Oceanogr., 27, 500-509. and 1990: Irradiance transmittance through the air/water interface. Ocean Optics X, R.W. Spinrad, Ed., SPIE, 1302, 556-565. , R. Evans, J. Brown, G. Feldman, C. McClain, and W. Esaias, 1992: The remote sensing of ocean primary productivity-use of a new data compilation to test satellite algorithms. J. Geophys. Res., 97, 2,279-2,293. Ball Aerospace Systems Division, 1979: Development of the Coastal Zone Color Scanner for Nimbus-7, Test and Performance Data. Final Report F78-11, Rev. A, Vol. 2, Boulder, Colorado, 94pp. Angstrom , A., 1964: The parameters of atmospheric turbidity. Barale, V., C.R. McClain, and P. Malanotte-Rizzoli, 1986: Tellus, 16, 64-75. Arking, A., and J.D. Childs, 1985: Retrieval of cloud cover parameters from multispectral satellite images. J. Climate Appl. Meteor., 24, 322-333. Austin, R.W., 1974: The remote sensing of spectral radiance from below the ocean surface. Optical Aspects of Oceanography, N.G. Jerlov and E. Steemann-Nielsen, Eds., Academic Press, 317-344. , 1976: Air-Water Radiance Calibration Factor. Tech. Memo. ML-76-004t, Vis. Lab., Scripps Inst. of Oceanogr., La Jolla, California, 8pp. , 1980: Gulf of Mexico, ocean-color surface-truth measurements. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 18, 269-285. , 1993: Optical remote sensing of the oceans: BC (Before CZCS) and AC (After CZCS). Ocean Colour: Theory and Applications in a Decade of CZCS Experience, V. Barale and P. Schlittenhardt, Eds., ECSC, EEC, EAEC, Brussels and Luxembourg, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, Massachusetts, 1-15. 24 Space and time variability of the surface color field in the northern Adriatic Sea. J. Geophys. Res., 91, 12,957- 12,974. , and R. Wittenburg-Fay, 1986: Variability of the ocean surface color field in central California near-coastal waters as observed in seasonal analysis of CZCS imagery. J. Mar. Res., 44, 291-316. , and P. Schlittenhardt, 1993: Ocean Colour: Theory and Applications in a Decade of CZCS Experience, ECSC, EEC, EAEC, Brussels and Luxembourg, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, Massachusetts, 367pp. Barnes, R.A., and A.W. Holmes, 1993: Overview of the Sea- WiFS Ocean Sensor. Proc. SPIE, 1,939, 224-232. , W.L. Barnes, W.E. Esaias, and C.L. McClain, 1994a: Prelaunch Acceptance Report for the SeaWiFS Radiometer. NASA Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol. 22, S.B. Hooker, E.R. Firestone, and J.G. Acker, Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 32pp.

Original page 28

E.R. Firestone and S.B. Hooker , A.W. Holmes, W.L. Barnes, W.E. Esaias, and C.R. Mc- Bruegge, C.J., V.G. Duval, N.L. Chrien, and D.J. Diner, 1993: Clain, 1994b: The SeaWiFS Prelaunch Radiometeric Calibration and Spectral Characterization. NASA Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol. 23, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 55pp. Berger, W.H., 1989: Productivity of the Ocean: Present and Past. V.S. Smetacek and G. Wefer, Eds., John Wiley & Sons, 471 pp. Berk, A., L.S. Bernstein, and D.C. Robertson, 1989: MOD- TRAN: A moderate resolution model for LOWTRAN 7. GL-TR-89-0122, Geophysics Laboratory, Air Force Systems Command, 38pp. Bernstein, R.L., 1982: Sea surface temperature estimation using the NOAA-6 satellite Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer. J. Geophys. Res., 87, 9,455-9,465. Biggar, S.F., D.I. Gellman, and P.N. Slater, 1990: Improved evaluation of optical depth components from Langley plot data. Remote Sens. Environ., 32, 91-101. , P.N. Slater, K.J. Thome, A.W. Holmes, and R.A. Barnes, 1993: Preflight solar-based calibration of SeaWiFS. Proc. SPIE, Vol. 1,939, 233-242. Bird, R.E., and C. Riordan, 1986: Simple solar spectral model for direct and diffuse irradiance on horizontal and tilted planes at the Earth's surface for cloudless atmospheres. J. of Climate and Appl. Meteor., 25, 87-97. Booth, C.R.B. and R.C. Smith, 1988: Moorable spectroradiometer in the Biowatt Experiment. Ocean Optics IX, SPIE 925, 176-188. Bowman, K.P., and A.J. Krueger, 1985: A global climatology of total ozone from the Nimbus 7 Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer. J. Geophys. Res., 90, 7,967-7,976. Boyd, R.A., 1951: The development of prismatic glass block and the daylight laboratory. Eng. Res. Bull No. 32, Eng. Res. Inst., Univ. of Mich., Ann Arbor, Michigan, 88pp. Bricaud, A., A. Morel, and L. Prieur, 1981: Absorption by dissolved organic matter of the sea (yellow substance) in the UV and visible domains. Limnol. Oceanogr., 26, 43- 53. , and , 1987: Atmospheric corrections and interpretation of marine radiances in CZCS imagery: use of a reflectance model. Oceanol. Acta, 7, 33-50. Calibration plans for the Multi-angle Imaging Spectroradiometer (MISR). Metrologia, 30(4), 213-221. Bruening, R.J., 1987: Spectral irradiance scales based on filtered absolute silicon photodetectors. Appl. Opt., 26, 1,051-1,057. Burlov-Vasiljev, K.A., E.A. Gurtovenko, and Y.B. Matvejev, 1992: The Solar Radiation Between 310-680 nm. Proceedings of the Workshop on the Solar Electromagnetic Radiation Study for Solar Cycle 22, R.E. Donnelly, Ed., U.S. DOC NOAA Environmental Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado, 49-53. -C- Campbell, J.W., and J.E. O'Reilly, 1988: Role of satellites in estimating primary productivity on the northwest Atlantic continental shelf. Cont. Shelf Res., 8, 179-204. Capellari, J.O., C.E. Velez, and A.J. Fuchs, 1976: Mathematical Theory of the Goddard Trajectory Determination System. GSFC X-582-76-77, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 596pp. Caraux, D., and R.W. Austin, 1983: Delineation of Seasonal Changes of Chlorophyll Frontal Boundaries in Mediterranean Coastal Waters with NIMBUS-7 Coastal ZoneColor Scanner Data. Rem. Sens. Environ., 13, 239-249. Carder, K.L., G.R. Harvey, R.G. Steward, and P.B. Ortner, 1989: Marine humic and fulvic acids: their effects on remote sensing of ocean chlorophyll. Limnol. Oceanogr., 34, 68-81. , W.W. Gregg, O.K. Costello, K. Haddad, and J.M. Prospero, 1991: Determination of Saharan dust radiance and chlorophyll a from CZCS imagery. J. Geophys. Res., 96, 5,369-5,378. , P. Reinersman, R.F. Chen, F. Muller-Karger, C.O. Davis, and M. Hamilton, 1993a: AVIRIS calibration and application in coastal oceanic environments. Remote Sens. Environ., 44, 205-216. , R.G. Steward, R.F. Chen, S. Hawes, Z. Lee, and C.O. Davis, 1993b: AVIRIS calibration and application in coastal oceanic environments: Tracers of soluble and particulate constituents of the Tampa Bay coastal plume. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens, 59(3), 339-344. Brock, J.C., C.R. McClain, M.E. Luther, and W.W. Hay, 1991: Cardone, V.J., J.G. Greenwood, and M.A. Cane, 1990: On The phytoplankton bloom in the northwest Arabian Sea during the southwest monsoon of 1979. J. Geophys. Res., 96, 20,623-20,642. , and , 1992: Interannual variability in phytoplankton blooms observed in the northwestern Arabian Sea during the southwest monsoon. J. Geophys. Res., 97, 733-750. trends in historical marine wind data. J. Climate, 3, 113- 127. Cebula, R.P., H. Park, and D.F. Heath, 1988: Characterization of the Nimbus-7 SBUV radiometer for the long term monitoring of stratospheric ozone. J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 5, 215-227. Brouwer, D., 1959: Solution of the problem of artificial satellite Chamberlin, W.S., C.R. Booth, D.A. Kiefer, J.H. Morrow, and theory without drag. Astron. J., 64(1274), 378-397. Brown, C.W., and J.A. Yo'der, 1994: Coccolithophorid blooms in the global ocean. J. Geophys. Res., 99(C4), 7,467- ,7,482. Brown, O.B., and R.H. Evans, 1985: Calibration of Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer'infrared observations. J. Geophys. Res., 90, 11,667-11,677. R.C. Murphy, 1989: Evidence for a simple relationship between natural fluorescence, photosynthesis, and chlorophyll a in the sea. Deep Sea Res., 37, 951-973. Chelton, D.B., and M.G. Schlax, 1991: Estimation of time averages from irregularly spaced observations: With application to coastal zone color scanner estimates of chlorophyll a concentrations. J. Geophys. Res., 96, 14,669-14,692. 25

Original page 29

SeaWiFS Technical Report Series Cumulative Index: Volumes 1-23 Chin, R.T., C. Jau, and J.A. Weinman, 1987: The application , 1972b: Development of programs for computing characof time series models to cloud field morphology analysis. teristics of ultraviolet radiation. TechnicalReport—Scalar J. Climate Appl. Meteor., 26, 363-373. Clark, D.K., 1981: Phytoplankton pigment algorithms for the Case, Program II, FSC-72-0011, IBM Federal Systems Division, Gaithersburg, Maryland, 38 pp. Nimbus-7 CZCS. Oceanography from Space, J.F.R. Gower, Denman, K.L.,and M.R. Abbott, 1988: Time evolution of sur- Ed., Plenum Press, 227-238. , E.T. Baker, and A.E. Strong, 1980: Upwelled spectral face chlorophyll patterns from cross spectrum analysis of satellite color images. J. Geophys. Res., 93, 6,789-6,798. radiance distributions in relation to particulate matter in Detwiler, A., 1990: Analysis of cloud imagery using box countsea water. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 18, 287-298. Coakley, J.A., Jr., and P.P. Bretherton, 1982: Cloud cover from high resolution scanner data: Detecting and allowing for partially filled fields of view. J. Geophys. Res., 87, 4,917- 4,932. Comiso, J.C., N.G. Maynard, W.O. Smith, Jr., and C.W. Suling. Int. J. Remote Sens., 11, 887-898. Deuser, W.G., F.E. Muller-Karger, and C. Hemleben, 1988: Tempered variations of particle fluxes in the deep subtropical and tropical North Atlantic: Eulerian versus Lagrangian effects. J. Geophys. Res., 93, 6,857-6,862. , , R.H. Evans, O.B. Brown, W.E. Esaias, and G.C. Feldman, 1990: Surface-ocean color and deep-sea carbon livan, 1990: Satellite ocean color studies of Antarctic ice flux: how close a connection? Deep-Sea Res., 37, 1,331edges in summer and autumn. J. Geophys. Res., 95, 9,481- 1,343. 9,496. Dickey, T., J. Marra, T. Granata, C. Langdon, M. Hamilton, J. , C.R. McClain, C.W. Sullivan, J.P. Ryan, and C.L. Leon- Wiggert, D. Siegel, and A. Bratkovich, 1991: Concurrent ard, 1993: Coastal zone color scanner pigment concentra- high-resolution bio-optical and physical time series obsertions in the Southern Ocean and relationships to geophys- vations in the Sargasso Sea during the spring of 1987. J. ical surface features. J. Geophys. Res., 98, 2,419-2,451. Geophys. Res., 96, 8,643-8,663. Corredera, P., A. Corrons, A. Pons, and J. Campos, 1990: Ab- Duffett-Smith, P., 1979: Practical Astronomy With Your Calsolute spectral Irradiance scale in the 700-2400 nm spectral culator. Cambridge University Press, 129pp. range. Appl. Opt., 29, 3,530-3,534. Cox, C., and W. Munk, 1954a: Measurement of the roughness J. Ebert, E.E., 1992: Pattern recognition analysis of polar clouds of the sea surface from photographs of the sun's glitter. Opt. Soc. Am., 44, 838-850. -, and- 1954b: Statistics of the sea surface derived from sun glitter. J. Mar. Res., 13, 198-277. -Eduring summer and winter. Int. J. Remote Sens., 13, 97- 109. Eck, T.F., and V.L. Kalb, 1991: Cloud-screening for Africa using a geographically and seasonally variable infrared and- , 1955: Some Problems in OpticalOceanography. threshold. Int. J. Remote Sens., 12, 1,205-1,221. Scripps Institution of Oceanography, LaJolla, California, 63-77. Eckstein, B.A., and J.J. Simpson, 1991: Cloud screening Coastal Zone Color Scanner images using channel 5. Int. J. Crane, R.J., and M.R. Anderson, 1984: Satellite discrimination Remote Sens., 12, 2,359-2,377. of snow/cloud surfaces. Int. J. Remote Sens., 5, 213-223. England, C.F., and G.E. Hunt, 1985: A bispectral method Curran, R.J., 1972: Ocean color determination through a scat- for the automatic determination of parameters for use in tering atmosphere. Appl. Opt., 11, 1,857-1,866. , H.L. Kyle, L.R. Elaine, J. Smith, and T.D. Clem, 1981: imaging satellite cloud retrievals. Int. J. Remote Sens., 6, 1,545-1,553. Multichannel scanning radiometer for remote sensing cloud Eppley, R.W., 1984: Relations between primary productivity Rev. Sci. lustrum., 52, 1,546-1,555. and ocean chlorophyll determined by satellites. Global physical parameters. -D- Ocean Flux Study: Proceedings of a Workshop, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 85-102. Esaias, W., G. Feldman, C.R. McClain, and J. Elrod, 1986: Darzi, M., 1992: Cloud Screening for Polar Orbiting Visible Satellite observations of oceanic primary productivity. Eos, and IR Satellite Sensors. NASA Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol. Trans. AGU, 67, 835-837. 7, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 7pp. Evans, R.H., and H.R. Gordon, 1994: CZCS "system calibration:" A retrospective examination. J. Geophys. Res., 99, and C.R. McClain, 1989: SEA- 7,293-7,307. , J. Chen, J. Firestone, PAK: A satellite image analysis system for oceanographic Conf. Interactive Information -Fresearch. Proc. Fifth Intl. Processing Systems for MeteoroL, Oceanogr., and Hydrol, Feldman, G., 1986: Variability of the productive habitat in the Am. MeteoroL Soc., Atlanta, Georgia, 26-32. eastern equatorial Pacific. Eos, Trans. AGU,67, 106-108. Dave, J.V., 1972a: Development of programs for computing , D. Clark, and D. Halpern, 1984: Satellite color obsercharacteristics of ultraviolet radiation. Technical Report— vations of the phytoplankton distribution in the eastern Vector Case, Program IV, FSC-72-0013, IBM Federal Sys- equatorial Pacific during the 1982-1983 El Nino. Science, tems. Division, Gaithersburg, Maryland, 138pp. 26 226, 1,069-1,071.

Original page 30

E.R. Firestone and S.B. Hooker , N. Kuring, C. Ng, W. Esaias, C. McClain, J. Elrod, N. Maynard, D. Endres, R. Evans, J. Brown, S. Walsh, M. Carle, and G. Podesta, 1989: Ocean Color: Availabilityof the global data set. Eos, Trans. AGU,70, 634. Firestone, E.R., and S.B. Hooker 1992: SeaWiFS Technical -G- Gallaudet, T.C., and J.J. Simpson, 1991: Automated cloud screening of AVHRR imagery using split-and-merge clustering. Remote Sens. Environ., 38, 77-121. NASA Garand, L., 1986: Automated Recognition of Oceanic Cloud Report Series Cumulative Index: Volumes 1-5. Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol. 6, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 9pp. Patterns and Its Application to Remote Sensing of Meteorological Parameters. Doctoral dissertation, Dept. of Meteorology, Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison. , and S.B. Hooker 1993: SeaWiFS Technical Report Series General Sciences Corp., 1991: SeaWiFS Science Data and Infor- Cumulative Index: Volumes 1-11. NASA Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol. 12, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 28pp. , and S.B. Hooker 1995: SeaWiFS Technical Report Series Cumulative Index: Volumes 1-17. NASA Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol. 18, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 47pp. Firestone, J.K., G. Fu, M. Darzi, and C.R. McClain, 1990: NASA's SEAPAK software for oceanographic data analysis: An update. Proc. Sixth Int. Conf. Interactive Information Processing Systems for Meteor., Oceanogr., and Hydrol., Am. Meteor. Soc., Anaheim, California, 260-267. , and B.D. Scheiber, 1994: "The Generation of Ancillary Data Climatologies." In: McClain, C.R., K.R. Arrigo, J. Comiso, R. Fraser, M. Darzi, J.K. Firestone, B. Schieber, E-n. Yeh, and C.W. Sullivan, 1994: Case Studies for SeaWiFS Calibration and Validation, Part 1. NASA Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol. 13, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 35-42. Flierl, G., D. Glover, J. Bishop, and S. Paranjpe, 1993: The JGOFS Distributed Object Oriented Data System User Guide. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 90pp. Flittner, D.E., and P.N. Slater, 1991: Stability of narrow-band filter radiometers in the solar-reflectiverange. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., 57, 165-171. Fofonoff, N.P., and R.C. Millard, Jr., 1983: Algorithms for Computation of Fundamental Properties of Seawater. UN- ESCO Tech. Papers in Mar. Sci., 44, UNESCO, 53pp. Fraser, R.S., 1993: Optical thickness of atmospheric dust over Tadjikistan. Atmos. Envir., 27A, 2,533-2,538. , R.A. Ferrare, Y.J. Kaufman, B.L. Markham, and S. Mattoo, 1992: Algorithm for atmospheric corrections of aircraft and satellite imagery. Int. J. Remote Sens., 13, 541- 557. Frederick, J.E., R.P. Cebula, and D.F. Heath, 1986: Instrument characterization for detection of long-term changes in stratospheric ozone: An analysis of the SBUV/2 radiometer. J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 3, 472-480. Frohlich, C., 1979: WMO/PMOD Sunphotometer: Instructions for Manufacture. World Meteor. Org., Geneva, Switzerland, 3pp., (plus tables and drawings). Frost, B.W., 1991: The role of grazing in nutrient rich areas of the open seas. Limnol. Oceanogr., 36, 1,616-1,630. Fukuchi, M., 1980: Phytoplankton chlorophyll stocks in the Antarctic ocean. J. Oceanogr. Soc. Japan, 36, 73-84. mation System Architecture Report. GSC-TR-21-91-006, General Sciences Corp., Laurel, Maryland, 133pp. Gieskes, W.W.C., and G.W. Kraay, 1986: Analysis of phytoplankton pigments by HPLC before, during, and after mass occurrence of the microflagellate corymbellus during the spring bloom in the open north North Sea in 1983. Mar. Biol, 92, 45-52. Gleason, J.F., P.K. Bhartia, J.R. Herman, R. McPeters, P. Newman, R.S. Stolarski, L. Flynn, G. Labow, D. Larko, C. Seftor, C. WeUemeyer, W.D. Komhyr, A.J. Miller, and W. Planet, 1993: Record lowglobal ozone in 1992. Science, 260, 523-526. Gordon, H.R., 1978: Removal of atmospheric effects from satellite imagery of the oceans. Appl. Opt., 17, 1,631-1,636. , 1981a: Reduction of error introduced in the processing of coastal zone color scanner-type imagery resulting from sensor calibration and solar irradiance uncertainty. Appl. Opt., 20, 207-210. , 1981b: A preliminary assessment of the Nimbus-7 CZCS atmospheric correction algorithm in a horizontally inhcmogeneous atmosphere. Oceanography from Space, J.F.R. Gower, Ed., Plenum Press, 257-266. , 1985: Ship perturbations of irradiance measurements at sea, 1: Monte Carlo simulations. Appl. Opt., 24, 4,172- 4,182. , 1987a: Calibration requirements and methodology for remote sensors viewing the ocean in the visible. Remote Sens. Environ., 22, 103-126. , 1987b: Visible calibration of ocean-viewing sensors. Remote Sens, of Environ., 22, 103-126. , 1988: Ocean color remote sensing systems: radiometric requirements. Recent Advances in Sensors, Radiometry, and Data Processing for Remote Sensing, P.N. Slater, Ed., SPIE, 924, 151-167. , 1989: Can the Lambert-Beer law be applied to the diffuse attenuation coefficient of ocean water? Limnol. Oceanogr., 34, 1,389-1,409. , 1990: Radiometric considerations for ocean color remote sensors. Appl. Opt., 29, 3,228-3,236. , 1991: Absorption and scattering estimates from irradiance measurements: Monte Carlo simulations. Limnol. Oceanogr., 36, 769-777. , and D.K. Clark, 1980: Remote sensing optical properties of a stratified ocean: an improved interpretation. Appl. Opt, 19, 3,428-3,430. 27

Original page 31

SeaWiFS Technical Report Series Cumulative Index: Volumes 1-23 , , J.L. Mueller, and W.A. Hovis, 1980: Phytoplankton Groom, S.B., and P.M. Holligan, 1987: Remote sensing of cocpigments from the NIMBUS-7 Coastal Zone Color Scan- colithophorid blooms. Adv. Space Res., 7, 73-78. ner: Comparisons with surface measurements. Science, 210, 63-66. Guenther, B., 1991: Accuracy and precisions actually achieved for large aperture sources for aircraft and space investiga- Clear water radiances for atmospheric tions. Metrologia, 28, 229-232. , and , 1981: correction of coastal zone color scanner imagery. Appl. Gutman, G., D. Tarpley, and G. Ohring, 1987: Cloud screen- Opt., 20, 4,175-4,180. , , J.W. Brown, O.B. Brown, and R.H. Evans, 1982: Satellite measurements of phytoplankton pigment concening for determination of land surface characteristics in a reduced resolution satellite data set. Int. J. Remote Sens., 8, 859-870. tration in the surface waters of a warm core Gulf Stream -Hring. J. Mar. Res., 40, 491-502. Habermann, T., 1991: Freeform—A Flexible System of Format , , , , , and W.W. Broenkow, 1983a: Phy- Specifications For Data Access. National Geophysical Data toplankton pigment concentrations in the Middle Atlantic Center, NOAA, 37pp. Bight: Comparison of ship determinations and CZCS estimates. Appl. Opt, 22, 20-36. Haury, L.R., J.J. Simpson, J. Pelaez, C. Koblinsky, and D. Wiesenhahn, 1986: Biological consequences of a recurrent , J.W. Brown, O.B. Brown, R.H. Evans, and O.K. Clark, eddy off Point Conception, California. J. Geophys. Res.; Nimbus 7 CZCS: reduction of its radiometric sen- 91, 12,937-12,956. 1983b: sitivity with time. Appl. Opt., 24, 3,929-3,931. Hay, B.J., C.R. McClain, and M. Petzold, 1993: An assessment , and D.J. Castano, 1987: Coastal Zone Color Scanner at- of the NIMBUS-7 CZCS calibration for May 1986 using mospheric correction algorithm: multiple scattering effects. satellite and in situ data from the Arabian Sea. Remote Appl. Opt., 26, 2,111-2,122. , O.B. Brown, R.H. Evans, J.W. Brown, R.C. Smith, K.S. Baker, and D.K. Clark, 1988a. A semianalytic radiance model of ocean color. J. of Geophys. Res., 93, 10,909- 10,924. Sens. Environ., 43, 35-46. Hayes, S.P., L.J. Mangum, J. Picaut, A. Sumi, and K. Takeuchi, 1991: TOGA-TAO: A moored array for real-time measurements in the tropical Pacific Ocean. Bull. Am. Meteor. Soc., 72, 339-347. Helliwell, W.S., G.N. Sullivan, B. MacDonald, and K.J. Voss, , J.W. Brown, and R.H. Evans, 1988b: Exact Rayleigh 1990: Ship shadowing: model and data comparison. Ocean scattering calculations for use with the Nimbus-7 Coastal Optics X, R.W. Spinrad, Ed., SPIE, 1302, 55-71. Zone Color Scanner. Appl. Opt., 27, 5, 862-871. Herman, J.R., R.D. Hudson, and G.N. Serafino, 1990: An , and D.J. Castano, 1989: Aerosol analysis with Coastal analysis of the 8 year trend in ozone depletion from alter- Zone Color Scanner: A simple method for including mul- nate models of SBUV instrument degradation. J. Geophys. tiple scattering effects. Appl. Opt, 28, 1,320-1,326. Res., 95, 7,403-7,416. Self shading of in-water optical in- Hoge, F.E., and R.N. Swift, 1990: Phytoplankton accessory , and K. Ding, 1991: struments. Limnol. Oceanogr., 37, 491-500. pigments: Evidence for the influence of phycoerythrin on the submarine light field. Remote Sens. Environ., 34, 19- , and M. Wang, 1994: Retrieval of water-leaving radiances 25. and aerosol optical thickness over the oceans with Sea- WiFS: a preliminary algorithm, Appl. Opt, 33, 443-452. Holm-Hansen, O., C.J. Lorenzen, R.W. Holmes, and J.D.H. Strickland, 1965: Fluorometric determination of chloro- Gower, J.F.R., 1985: Reduction of the effect of clouds on satel- phyll. J. du Cons. Int'l. pour I'Explor. de la Mer, 30, lite thermal imagery. Int. J. Remote Sens., 6, 1,419-1,434. 3-15. Gregg, W.W., 1992: Analysis of Orbit Selection for SeaWiFS: Hooker, S.B., P.L. Coronado, W.E. Esaias, G.C. Feldman, Tech. Memo. W.W. Gregg, C.R. McClain, B.W. Meeson, L.M. Olsen, Ascending vs. Descending Node. NASA Eds., R.A. Barnes, and E.F. Del-Colle, 1992a: Baselines and 104566, Vol. 2, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, Mary- Background Documentation, SeaWiFS Science Team Meet- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, land, 16pp. ing, January, 1993, Volume 1, S.B. Hooker and W.E. Esaias, Eds., SeaWiFS Proj. Office, NASA Goddard Space , 1993: The Simulated SeaWiFS Data Set, Version 1. Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 244pp. NASA Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol. 9, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 17pp. irradi- Firestone, Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, , and K.L. Carder, 1990: A simple spectral solar , W.E. Esaias, G.C. Feldman, W.W. Gregg, and C.R. Mc- Clain, 1992b: An Overview of SeaWiFS and Ocean Color. NASA Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol. 1, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Limnol. Greenbelt, Maryland, 24pp., plus color plates. ance model for cloudless maritime atmospheres. Oceanogr., 35, 1,657-1,675. , W.L. Barnes W.E. Esaias, G.C. Feldman, W.W. Gregg, of tilt capability for R.G. Kirk, C.R. McClain, C.H. Vermillion, D.J. Zukor, , and F.S. Patt, 1994: Assessment spaceborne global ocean color sensors. IEEE Trans. Geosci. R.A. Barnes, 1993a: SeaWiFS Project Presentations, Sea- Remote Sens., 32, 866-877. Griggs, M., 1968: Absorption coefficients of ozone in the ultraviolet and visible regions. J. Chem. Phys., 49, 857. 28 WiFS Science Team Meeting, January, 1993, Volume 2. S.B. Hooker and W.E. Esaias, Eds., SeaWiFS Proj. Office, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 235pp.

Original page 32

E.R. Firestone and S.B. Hooker Proceedings of Joint EOSAT-NASA SeaWiFS Working Group, 1987: System , W.E. Esaias, and L.A. Rexrode, 1993b: the First SeaWiFS Science Team Meeting. NASA Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol. 8, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 61pp. concept for wide-field-of-view observations of ocean phenomena from space. Report of the Joint EOSAT/NASA SeaWiFS Working Group, Earth Observation Satellite Co., Lanham, Maryland, 92pp. , C.R. McClain, and A. Holmes, 1993c: Ocean color imag- Joint Global Ocean Flux Study, 1991: JGOFS Core Measureing: CZCS to SeaWiFS. Mar. Tech. Soc. J., 27, 3-15. Hoots, F.R., and R.L. Roehrich, 1980: Models for Propagation ments Protocols. JGOFS Report No. 6, Scientific Committee on Oceanic Research, 40 pp. Project Spacetrack Report No. Joseph, J.H., 1985: The morphology of fair weather cumulus of NORAD Element Sets. 3, 100pp. Hoppel, W.A., J.W. Fitzgerald, G.M. Prick, and R.E. Larcloud fields as remotely sensed from satellites and some applications. Adv. Space Res., 5, 213-216. Aerosol size distributions and optical proper- Jursa, A.S., 1985: Handbook of Geophysics and the Space Envison, 1990: ties found in the marine boundary layer over the Atlantic Ocean. J. Geophys. Res., 95, 3,659-3,686. Hovis, W.A., 1981: The Nimbus-7 Coastal Zone Color Scanner (CZCS) program. Oceanography from Space, J.F.R. Gower, Ed., Plenum Press, 213-225. , and K.C. Leung, 1977: Remote sensing of ocean color. Optical Eng., 16, 158-166. , D.K. Clark, F. Anderson, R.W. Austin, W.H. Wilson, E.T. Baker, D. Ball, H.R. Gordon, J.L. Mueller, S. El- Sayed, B. Sturm, R.C. Wrigley, and C.S. Yentsch, 1980: NIMBUS-7 Coastal Zone Color Scanner: System description and initial imagery. Science, 210, 60-63. , J.S. Knoll, and G.R. Smith, 1985: Aircraft measurements for calibration of an orbiting spacecraft sensor. Appl. Opt. 24, 407-410. Hughes, C.G., III, 1982: Silicon photodiode absolute spectral ronment. Air Force Geophysics Laboratory, 18-11-18-24. Justice, J.O., B.L. Markham, J.R.G. Townshend, and R.L. Kennard, 1989: Spatial degradation of satellite data. Int. J. Remote Sens., 10, 1,539-1,561. Justus, C.G., and M.V. Paris, 1985: A model for solar spectral irradiance and radiance at the bottom and top of a cloudless atmosphere, J. Climate Appl. Meteor., 24, 193-205. -K- Kasten, F., 1966: A new table and approximate formula for relative optical air mass. Geophys. Biokimatol, B14, 206- 223. Kaufman, Y.J., 1987: The effect of subpixel clouds on remote sensing. Int. J. Remote Sens., 8, 839-857. Kelly, K.A., 1985: Separating clouds from ocean in infrared images. Remote Sensing Environ., 17, 67-83. self-calibration using a filtered tungsten source. Appl. Opt., Kerr, R.A., 1993: Ozone takes a nose dive after the eruption of 21, 2,129-2,132. -I- Inn, E.C.Y., and Y. Tanaka, 1953: Absorption coefficient of ozone in the ultraviolet and visible regions. J. Opt. Soc. Amer., 43, 870-873. Iqbal, M., 1983: An Introduction to Solar Radiation. Academic Press, 390pp. Ishizaka, J., 1990a: Coupling of Coastal Zone Color Scanner Mt. Pinatubo. Science, 260, 490-491. Key, J.R., and R.G. Barry, 1989: Cloud cover analysis with Arctic AVHRR data. 1. Cloud detection. J. Geophys. Res., 94, 18,521-18,535. , J.A. Maslanik, and R.G. Barry, 1989: Cloud classification from satellite data using a fuzzy sets algorithm: A polar example. Int. J. Remote Sens., 10, 1,823-1,842. Kidwell, K.B., 1991: NOAA Polar Orbiter User's Guide. NOAA NESDIS, Washington D.C., 279pp. data to physical-biological model of the southeastern U.S. Kiefer, D.A., and R.A. Reynolds, 1992: Advances in undercontinental shelf ecosystem, 1. CZCS data description and Lagrangian particle tracing experiments. J. Geophys. Res., 95, 10,167-10,181. , 1990b: Coupling of Coastal Zone Color Scanner data to physical-biological model of the southeastern U.S. continental shelf ecosystem, 2. an Eulerian model. J. Geophys. Res., 95, 10,183-10,199. , 1990c: Coupling of Coastal Zone Color Scanner data to physical-biological model of the southeastern U.S. continental shelf ecosystem, 3. nutrient and phytoplankton fluxes and CZCS data assimilation. J. Geophys. Res., 95, 10,201-10,212. -J- Jerlov, N.G., 1976: Marine Optics, Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co., 231pp. standing phytoplankton fluorescence and photosynthesis. Primary Productivity and Biogeochemical Cycles in the Sea, P.G. Falkowski and A.D. Woodhead, Eds., Plenum Press, 155-174. King, M.D., Y.J. Kaufman, W.P. Menzel, and D. Tanre, 1992: Remote sensing of cloud, aerosol, and water vapor properties from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (MODIS). IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 30, 2-27. Kneizys, F.X., E.P. Shettle, W.O. Gallery, J.H. Chetwynd, L.W. Abreu, J.E.A. Selby, S.A. Clough, and R.W. Fenn, 1983: Atmospheric transmittance/ radiance: computer code LOWTRAN 6. AFGL-TR-83-0187, Air Force Geophysics Lab, Hanscom AFB, Massachusetts, 200pp. Koepke, P., 1985: The reflectance factors of a rough ocean with foam. Comment on "Remote sensing of sea state using the 0.8-1.1m spectral band" by L. Wald and M. Monget. Int. J. Remote Sens., 6, 787-799. • 29

Original page 33

SeaWiFS Technical Report Series CumulativeIndex: Volumes 1-23 Kohler, R., R. Pello, and J. Bonhoure, 1990: Temperature dependent nonlinearity effects of a QED-200 detector in the visible. Appl. Opt., 29, 4,212-4,215. Kuring, N., M.R. Lewis, T. Platt, and J.E. O'Reilly, 1990: Satellite-derived estimates of primary production on the northwest Atlantic continental shelf. Cont. Shelf Res., 10, 461-484. -L- Lee, Z., K.L, Carder, S.K. Hawes, R.G. Steward, T.G. Peacock and C.O. Davis, 1992: An interpretation of high spectral resolution remote sensing reflectance. Optics of the Air-Sea Interface: Theory and Measurement, L. Estep, Ed., SPIE, 1749, 49-64. Lyddane, R.H., 1963: Small eccentricities or inclinations in the Brouwer theory of the artificial satellite. Astron. J., 68, 555-558. Lynnes, C., B. Vollmer, H. Griffioen, and P. King, 1992: Metadata Submission Guide, version 0.9. NASA Goddard Space Flight Center DAAC, Oct. 2, 1992, NASA GSFC, Greenbelt, Maryland, llpp. -M- Mantoura, R.F.C., and C.A. Llewellyn, 1983: The rapid determination of algal chlorophyll and carotenoid pigments and their breakdown products in natural waters by reversephase high-performance liquid chromatography. Anal. Chim. Acta, 151, 297-314. Marshall, B.R., and R.C. Smith, 1990: Raman scattering and in-water optical properties. Appl. Opt., 29, 71-84. McClain, C.R., and L.P. Atkinson, 1985: A note on the Charleston Gyre. J. Geophys. Res., 90, 11,857-11,861. , S.-Y. Chao, L. Atkinson, J. Blanton, and F. de Castillejo, 1986: Wind-driven upwelling in the vicinity of Cape Finisterre, Spain. J. Geophys. Res., 91, 8,470-8,486. , J.A. Yoder, L.P. Atkinson, J.O. Blanton, T.N. Lee, J.J. Singer, and F. Muller-Karger, 1988: Variability of Surface Pigment Concentrations in the South Atlantic Bight. J. Geophys. Res., 93, 10,675-10,697. , J. Ishizaka, and E. Hofmann, 1990a: Estimation of phyto- -, C.J. Koblinsky, J. Firestone, M. Darzi, E-n. Yeh, and B. Beckley, 1991c: An examination of some Southern Ocean data sets, EOS Trans. AGU, 72, 345-351. -, W.E. Esaias, W. Barnes, B. Guenther, D. Endres, S.B. Hooker, G. Mitchell, and R. Barnes, 1992a: Calibration and Validation Plan for SeaWiFS. NASA Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol. 3, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 41 pp. -, G. Fu., M. Darzi, and J.K. Firestone, 1992b: PC-SEAPAK User's Guide, Version 4.0. NASA Technical Memorandum 104557, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 408 pp. -, E-n. Yeh, and G. Fu, 1992c: An Analysis of GAC Sampling Algorithms: A Case Study. NASA Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol. 4, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 20pp., plus color plates. -, G. Feldman, and W. Esaias, 1993: Oceanic primary production. Global Change Atlas, C. Parkinson, J. Foster, and R. Gurney, Eds., Cambridge University Press, 251-263. -, and E-n. Yeh, 1994: "CZCS Bio-Optical Algorithm Comparison." In: McClain, C.R., J.C. Comiso, R.S. Fraser, J.K. Firestone, B.D. Scheiber, E-n. Yeh, K.R. Arrigo, and C.W. Sullivan, 1994: Case Studies for SeaWiFS Calibration and Validation, Part 1. NASA Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol. 13, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 3-8. , and , 1994: "Sun glint flag sensitivity study." In: C.R. McClain, J.C. Comiso, R.S. Fraser, J.K. Firestone, B.D. Schieber, E-n. Yeh, K.R. Arrigo, and C.W. Sullivan, 1994: Case Studies for SeaWiFS Calibration and Validation, Part 1. NASA Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol. 13, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 46-47. McClain, E.P., 1989: Global sea surface temperatures and cloud clearing for aerosol optical depth estimates. Int. J. Remote Sens., 10, 763-769. , W.G. Pichel, and C.C. Walton, 1985: Comparative performance of AVHRR-based multichannel sea surface temperatures. J. Geophys. Res., 90, 11,587-11,601. plankton pigment changes on the Southeastern U.S. conti- McLean, J.T., and B.W. Guenther, 1989: Radiance calibration nental shelf from a sequence of CZCS images and a coupled physical-biological model. J. Geophys. Res., 95, 20,213- 20,235. , W.E. Esaias, G.C. Feldman, J. Elrod, D. Endres, J. Firestone, M. Darzi, R. Evans, and J. Brown, 1990b: Physical of spherical integrators. Optical Radiation Measurements II, SPIE, 1109, 114-121. Mecherikunnel, A.T., and H.L. Kyle, 1991: Eleven-year cycle of solar constant variation from spacecraft measurements: 1978 to 1990. Science, (withdrawn). and biological processes in the North Atlantic during the Meindl, E.A., and G.D. Hamilton, 1992: Programs of the Na- First Global GARP Experiment. J. Geophys. Res., 95, 18,027-18,048. tional Data Buoy Center, Bull. Am. Meteor. Soc., 73, 985- 993. , M. Darzi, J. Firestone, E.-n. Yeh, G. Fu, and D. Endres, Michaelsen, J., X. Zhang, and R.C. Smith, 1988: Variability 1991a: SEAPAK Users Guide, Version 2.0, Vol. I—System Description. NASA Tech. Mem. 100728, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 158pp. of pigment biomass in the California Current system as determined by satellite imagery, 2. temporal variability. J. Geophys. Res., 93, 10,883-10,896. , , , , , and , 1991b: SEAPAK Users Mitchell, B.C., 1990: Algorithms for determining the absorp- Guide, Version 2.0, Vol. II—Descriptions of Programs. NASA Tech. Mem. 100728, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 586pp. 30 tion coefficient for aquatic particulates using the quantitative filter technique. Ocean Optics X, R.W. Spinrad, Ed., SPIE, 1302, 137-148.

Original page 34

E.R. Firestone and S.B. Hooker , and D.A. Kiefer, 1984: Determination of absorption and fluorescence excitation spectra for phytoplankton. Marine Phytoplankton and Productivity, O. Holm-Hansen, L. Bolis, and R. Gilles, Eds., Springer-Verlag, 157-169. , and , 1988: Chlorophyll-o specific absorption and fluorescence excitation spectra for light-limited phytoplankton. Deep-Sea Res., 35, 639-663. , and O. Holm-Hansen, 1991: Bio-optical properties of -N- National Academy of Sciences, 1984: Global Ocean Flux Study, Proceedings of a Workshop, National Acad. Press, 360 pp. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1982: The marine resources experiment program (MAREX). Report of the Ocean Color Science Working Group, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 107pp. differentiation from temper- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Antarctic Peninsula waters: ate ocean models. Deep-Sea Res., 39, 1,009-1,028. Morel, A., 1980: In-water and remote measurements of ocean color. Bound.-layer Meteor., 18, 178-201. , and L. Prieur, 1977: Analysis of variations in ocean color. Limnol. Oceanogr., 22, 709-722. , and R.C. Smith, 1982: Terminology and units in optical oceanography. Mar. Geod., 5, 335-349. Mueller, J.L., 1985: Nimbus-7 CZCS: confirmation of its radiometric sensitivity decay rate through 1982. Appl. Opt., 24, 1,043-1,047. , 1988: Nimbus-7 CZCS: electronic overshoot due to cloud reflectance. Appl. Opt., 27, 438-440. 1990: NDBC Data Availability Summary, 1801-24-02 Rev. E, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Data Buoy Center, Stennis Space Center, 88pp. National Research Council, 1990: TOGA, A Review of Progress and Future Opportunities. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 66pp. National Space Science Data Center, 1991: NSSDC CDF User's Guide for UNIX .Systems, version 2.1. Publication NSSDC- WDC-A-R&S 91-30, 245pp. , 1993: NODIS (NSSDC's On-line Data and Information Service) [database on-line] Master Directory [cited July 1993] Data Set Information Search; identifier: Multiple Key Word Search—TOMS and COADS. , 1991: Integral Method for Irradiance Profile Analysis. Neckel, H., and D. Labs, 1984: The solar radiation between CHORS Tech. Memo. 007-91, San Diego State Univ., San Diego, California, 10pp. , 1993: The First SeaWiFS Intercalation Round-Robin Experiment, SIRREX-1, July 1992. NASA Tech. Memo. Eds., Olesen, F.-S., and H. Grassel, 1985: Cloud detection and clas- 104566, Vol. 14, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 60pp. 3300 and 12500 A. Sol. Phys., 90, 205-258. -Osification over the oceans at night with NOAA-7. Int. J. Remote Sens., 6, 1,435-1,444. , and R.E. Lang, 1989: Bio-optical provinces of the north- Olsen, L.M., and C.R. McClain, 1992: Cooperative efforts in east Pacific Ocean: a provisional analysis. Limnol. Oceanogr., 34, 1,572-1,586. , and R.W. Austin, 1992: Ocean Optics Protocols. NASA Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol. 5, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 45pp. support of ocean research through NASA's Climate Data System. Proc. Eighth Int. Conf. on Interactive Inform, and Processing Systems for Meteor., Oceanogr., and Hydrol., Am. Meteor. Soc., 206-211. -P,Q- , B.C. Johnson, C.L. Cromer, J.W. Cooper, J.T. McLean, Pagano, T.S., and R.M. Durham, 1993: Moderate resolution S.B. Hooker, and T.L. Westphal, 1994: The Second Sea- WiFS Intercalibration Round-Robin Experiment, SIR- REX-2, June 1993. NASA Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol.16, imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS). Proc. SPIE, 1,939, 2-17. Eds., NASA Goddard Palmer, J.M., 1988: Use of self-calibrated detectors in radio- S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 121pp. Muller-Karger, F., C.R. McClain, and P. Richardson, 1988: The dispersal of the Amazon water. Nature, 333, 56-59. , , T.R. Fisher, W.E. Esaias, and R. Varela, 1989: Pigment distribution in the Caribbean Sea: Observations from space. Prog. Oceanogr., 23, 23-64. , , R.N. Sambrotto, and G.C. Ray, 1990: A comparison of ship and CZCS-mapped distributions of phytoplankton in the Southeastern Bering Sea. J. Geophys. Res., 95, 11,483-11,499. , J.J. Walsh, R.H. Evans, and M.B. Meyers, 1991: On the seasonal phytoplankton concentration and sea surface temperature cycles of the Gulf of Mexico as determined by satellites. J. Geophys. Res., 96, 12,645-12,665. metric instruments. Recent Advances in Sensors, Radiometry, and Data Processing for Remote Sensing. P.N. Slater, Ed., SPIE, 924, 224-231. Paltridge, G.W., and C.M.R. Platt, 1976: Radiative processes in meteorology and climatology. Developments in Atmospheric Science, Vol. 5. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co., 318pp. Parikh, J.A., 1977: A comparative study of cloud classification techniques. Remote Sens. Environ., 6, 67-81. Patt, F.S., C.W. Hoisington, W.W. Gregg, and P.L. Coronado, 1993: Analysis of Selected Orbit Propagation Models for the SeaWiFS Mission. NASA Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol. 11, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 16 pp. 31

Original page 35

SeaWiFS Technical Report Series Cumulative Index: Volumes 1-23 Exact closed-form geolocation -, 1989: A comparison of satellite-retrieved parameters with , and W.W. Gregg, 1994: algorithm for Earth survey sensors. Inter. J, Remote Sens., mesoscale model results. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 115, 15, 3,719-3,734. 551-572. 1988: A Method for Obtaining Analytical Curve , and K.T. Kriebel, 1988: An improved method for detect- Petzold, T.J., Tech. ing clear sky and cloudy radiances from AVHRR data. Int. Fits to Underwater Radiometric Measurements. Memo. Oc Op/TJP~88-06t, Scripps Inst. of Oceanogr., La J. Remote Sens., 9, 123-150, Errata, ibid., 9, 1,393-1,394. Jolla, California, 20pp. Shaw, G.E., 1976: Error analysis of multiwavelength sun pho- , and R.W. Austin, 1988: Characterization of MER-1032. tometry. Pure Appl. Geophys., 114, 1-14. Tech. Memo. EV-001-881, Vis. Lab., Scripps Inst. of Ocean ogr., La Jolla, California, 56pp. Simpson, J.J., and C. Humphrey, 1990: An automated cloud screening algorithm for daytime Advanced Very High Res- Finite Element Simula- olution Radiometer imagery. J. Geophys. Res., 95, 13,459- Finder, G.F., and W.G. Gray, 1977: tion in Surface and Subsurface Hydrology. Academic Press, 13,481. 295pp. Slater, P.N., and J.M. Palmer, 1991: Solar-diffuser panel and Phulpin, T., M. Derrien, and A. Brard, 1983: A two-dimension- ratioing radiometer approach to satellite sensor on-board al histogram procedure to analyze cloud cover from NOAA calibration. Proc. SPIE, 1,493, 100-105. satellite high-resolution imagery. J. Climate Appl. Meteor., Slutz, R.J., S.J. Lubker, J.D. Hiscox, S.D. Woodruff, R.L. Jenne, 22 1,332-1,345. P.M. Steurer, and J.D. Elms, 1985: ComprehensiveOcean- Platt, T., and S. Sathyendranath, 1988: Oceanic primary pro- Atmosphere Data Set; Release 1. Climate Research Production: estimation by remote sensing at local and regional gram, Boulder, Colorado, 263pp. scales. Science, 241, 1,613-1,620. Smith, R.C., and K.S. Baker, 1981: Optical properties of the , C.M. Caverhill, and M.R. Lewis, 1988: Ocean pri- clearest natural waters (200-800nm). Appl. Opt., 20, 177- , mary production and available light: further algorithms for 184. remote sensing. Deep-Sea Res., 35, 855-879. —, , and P. Dustan, 1981: Fluorometric techniques for "The remote sensing of the measurement of oceanic chlorophyll in the support of , and , 1993: Comment on ocean primary productivity: Use of a new data compilation remote sensing. SIO Ref. 81-17, Scripps Inst. of Ocean- J. ogr., La Jolla, California 14pp. to test satellite algorithms," by, William Balch et al., Geophys. Res., 98, 16,583-16,584. -R- -, and W.H. Wilson, 1981: Ship and satellite bio-optical research in the California Bight. Oceanography from Space, J.F.R. Gower, Ed., Plenum Press, 281-294. Raschke, E., P. Bauer, and H.J. Lutz, 1992: Remote sensing —, and K.S. Baker, 1984: Analysis of ocean optical data. of clouds and surface radiation budget over polar regions. Ocean Optics VII, M. Blizard, Ed., SPIE 478, 119-126. Int. J. Remote Sens., 13, 13-22. -, and , 1985: Spatial and temporal patterns in pig- Language ment biomass in Gulf Stream Warm-Core Ring 82B and Research Systems, Inc., 1992a: Interactive Data (IDL) User's Guide, Ver. 3.0. Boulder, Colorado, 356pp. its environs. J. Geophys. Res., 90, 8,859-8,870. , 1992b: Interactive Data Language (IDL) Reference Guide, -, and , 1986: Analysis of ocean optical data. Ocean Version 3.0. Boulder, Colorado, 424pp. Optics VIII, P.N. Slater, Ed., SPIE, 637, 95-107. A bispectral -, O.B. Brown, F.E. Hoge, K.S. Baker, R.H. Evans, R.N. Reynolds, D.W., and T.H. Vender Haar, 1977: Mon. Wea. Swift, and W.E. Esaias, 1987: Multiplatform sampling method for cloud parameter determination. Rev., 105, 446-457. Reynolds, R.W., 1988: A real-time global sea surface temperature analysis. J. Climate, 1, 75-86. Rossow, W.B., L.C. Carder, P.-J. Lu, and A. Walker, 1988: International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project (ISCCP) Documentation of Cloud Data. WMO/TD-No. 266, World Meteor. Org., Geneva. (ship, aircraft, and satellite) of a Gulf Stream warm core ring. Appl. Optics, 26, 2,068-2,081. -, X. Zhang, and J. Michaelsen, 1988: Variability of pigment biomass in the California Current system as determined by satellite imagery, 1. Spatial variability. J. Geophys. Res., 93, 10,863-10,882. -, and K.S. and Baker, 1989: Stratospheric ozone, middle ultraviolet radiation and phytoplankton productivity. , L.C. Carder, and A.A. Lacis, 1989: Global, seasonal cloud Oceanography, 2, 4-10. variations from satellite radiance measurements. Part I: Sensitivity of analysis. J. Climate, 2, 419-458. -, K.J. Waters, and K.S. Baker, 1991: Optical variability and pigment biomass in the Sargasso Sea as determined , and R.A. Schiffer, 1991: ISCCP cloud data products. using deep-sea optical mooring data. J. Geophys. Res., Bull. Am. Meteor. Soc., 72, 2-20. — S — 96, 8,665-8,686. -, B.B. Prezelin, K.S. Baker, R.R. Bidigare, N.P. Boucher, T. Coley, D. Karentz, S. Maclntyre, H.A. Matlick, D. Men- Saunders, R.W., 1986: An automated scheme for the removal zies, M. Ondrusek, Z. Wan and K.J. Waters, 1992: Ozone of cloud contamination for AVHRR radiances over western depletion: Ultraviolet radiation and phytoplankton biology Europe. Int. J. Remote Sens., 7, 867-888. 32 in Antarctic waters. Science, 255, 952-959.

Original page 36

E.R. Firestone and S.B. Hooker Smith, S.L., W. Balch, K. Banse, W. Berelson, P. Brewer, O. Brown, K. Cochran, H. Livingston, M. Luther, C. Mc- Clain, D. Olson, L. Peterson, W. Peterson, W. Prell, L. Codispoti, A. Devol, H. Ducklow, R. Fine, G. Hitchcock, D. Lai, D. Repeta, E. Sherr, N. Surgi, J. Swallow, S. -T- Thiermann, V., and E. Ruprecht, 1992: A method for the detection of clouds using AVHRR infrared observations. Int. J. Remote Sens., 13, 1,829-1,841. U.S. JGOFS: Arabian Toll, R.F., Jr., and W.M. Clune, 1985: An operational eval- Wakeham, and K. Wishner, 1991: Sea Process Study. U.S. JGOFS Planning Report No. 13, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts, 164pp. Smith, W.L., P.K. Rao, R. Koffler, and W.P. Curtis, 1970: The determination of sea surface temperature from satellite high-resolution infrared window radiation measurements. Man. Wea. Rev., 98, 604-611. nd S0rensen, B., 1981: Recommendations of the 2 international uation of the Navy Operational Global Atmospheric Prediction System (NOGAPS): 48-hour surface pressure forecasts. Man. Wea. Rev., 113, 1,433-1,440. Traganza, E., V. Silva, D. Austin, W. Hanson, and S. Bronsink, 1983: Nutrient mapping and recurrence of coastal upwelling centers by satellite remote sensing: Its implication to primary production and the sediment record. Coastal Upwelling, E. Suess and J. Thiede, Ed., Plenum Press, 61- 83. workshop on atmospheric correction of satellite observation Trees, C.C., M.C. Kennicutt, II, and J.M. Brooks, 1985: Errors of sea water colour. March 30-April 1, Ispra, Italy, 49pp. Stackpole, J.D., 1990: GRIB and BUFR: The only codes you associated with the standard fluorometric determination of chlorophylls and phaeopigments. Mar. Chem., 17, 1-12. Conf. on Interactive Informa- Trenberth, K.E., and J.G. Olson, 1988: An evaluation and inwill ever need. Sixth Intl. tion and Processing Systems for Meteoroi, Oceanogr., and Hydrol, Am. Meteoroi. Soc., Anaheim, California, 23-30. Stone, R.S., G.L. Stephens, C.M.R. Platt, and S. Banks, 1990: The remote sensing of thin cirrus cloud using satellites, lidar and radiative transfer theory. J. Appl. Meteor., 29, 353-366. tercomparison of global analyses from the National Meteorological Center and the European Centre for Me-dium Range Weather Forecasts. Bull. Am. Meteor. Soc., 69, 1,047-1,057. , W.G. Large, and J.G. Olson, 1990: The mean annual cycle in global ocean wind stress. J. Phys. Ocean ogr., 20, 1,742-1,760. Stowe, L.L., C.G. Wellemeyer, T.F. Eck, H.Y.M. Yeh, and the Tucker, C.J., and L.D. Miller, 1977: Soil spectra contributions Nimbus-7 Cloud Data Processing Team, 1988: Nimbus-7 global cloud climatology. J. Climate, 1, 445-470. to grass canopy spectral reflectance. Photogrammetry, Engineering, and Remote Sens., 721-726. McClain, R. Carey, P. Pellegrino, G. Gutman, P. Tyler, J.E., and R.C. Smith, 1970: Measurements of Spectral , E.P. Davis, C. Long, and S. Hart, 1991: Global distribution of cloud cover derived from NOAA/AVHRR operational satellite data. Adv. Space Phys., 11(3), 51-54. Stramski, D., 1990: Artifacts in measuring absorption spectra of phytoplankton collected on a filter. Limnol. Oceanogr., 35, 1,804-1,809. Strickland, J.D.H., and T.R. Parsons, 1972: A Practical Handbook of Sea Water Analysis. Fish. Res. Board. Canada, 310pp. Strub, P.T., C. James, A.C. Thomas, and M.R. Abbott, 1990: Seasonal and nonseasonal variability of satellite-derived Irradiance Underwater. Gordon and Breach, 103pp. -U- University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1989: NCSA HDF Specification. 43pp. , 1993: NCSA HDF Calling Interfaces and Utilities, Version 3.2. 121pp. -V- Viollier, M., 1982: Radiance calibration of the Coastal Zone Color Scanner: a proposed adjustment. Appl. Opt., 21, 1,142-1,145. surface pigment concentration in the California Current. Viollier, M., D. Tanre, and P.Y. Deschamps, 1980: An algo- J. Geophys. Res., 95, 11,501-11,530. Sturm, B., 1981: The atmospheric correction of remotely sensed rithm for remote sensing of water color from space. Bound. - Layer Meteor., 18, 247-267. data and the quantitative determination of suspended mat- Voss, K.J., J.W. Nolten, and G.D. Edwards, 1986: Ship shadow ter in marine water surface layers. Rem. Sens, in Meteor., Oceanogr., and Hydrol., A.P. Cracknell, Ed., John Wiley & Sons, 163-197. , 1993: CZCS data processing algorithms. Ocean Colour: Theory and Applications in a Decade of CZCS Experience, V. Barale and P.M. Schlittenhardt (Eds.), ECSC, EEC, EAEC, Brussels and Luxembourg, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, Massachusetts, 95-116. Sullivan, C.W., C.R. McClain, J.C. Comiso, and W.O. Smith, Jr., 1988: Phytoplankton standing crops within an Antarctic ice edge assessed by satellite remote sensing. J. Geophys. Res., 93, 12,487-12,498. effects on apparent optical properties. Ocean Optics VIII, M. Blizard, Ed., SPIE, 637, 186-190. , and G. Zibordi, 1989: Radiometric and geometric calibration of a spectral electro-optic "fisheye" camera radiance distribution system. J. of Atmos. and Ocean. Technol., 6, 652-662. -W- Walker, J.H., R.D. Saunders, J.K. Jackson, and D.A. McSparron, 1987: Spectral Irradiance Calibrations. NBS Special Publication 250-20, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C., 37pp. plus appendices. 33

Original page 37

SeaWiFS Technical Report Series Cumulative Index: Volumes 1-23 ., C.L. Cromer, and J.T. McLean, 1991: Technique for im- , R.A. Barnes, C.R. McClain, W.E. Esaias, W.L. Barnes, proving the calibration of large-area sphere sources. Ocean and A.T. Mecherikunnel, 1993: Modeling of the SeaWiFS Optics, B.W. Guenther, Ed., SPIE, 1493, 224-230. Walsh, J.J., G.T. Rowe, R.L. Iverson, and C.P. McRoy, 1981: Biological export of shelf carbon is a sink of the global CO2 cycle. Nature, 291, 196-201. Walters, N.M., 1983: Coastal zone colour scanner (CZCS) algorithm description for the South African coastal waters. Internal report, NPRL Div. of Optical Sciences, Pretoria, S. Africa, 30pp. Warneck, P., 1988: Chemistry of the Natural Atmosphere. Academic Press, 757pp. Solar and Lunar Observations. NASA Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol. 10, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 26pp. World Meteorological Organization, 1990: Report of the International Ozone Trends Panel, 1988: World Meteorological Organization Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project, Report No. 18, 2 Vols., Geneva, Switzerland. Wroblewski, J.S., J.L. Sarmiento, and G.R. Flierl, 1988: An ocean basin scale model of plankton dynamics in the North Atlantic 1. solutions for the climatological oceanographic Waters, K.J., R.C. Smith, and M.R. Lewis, 1990: Avoiding conditions in May. Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 2, 199-218. ship induced light field perturbation in the determination of oceanic optical properties. Oceanogr., 3, 18-21. Wu, R., J.A. Weinman, and R.T. Chin, 1985: Determination of rainfall rates from GOES satellite images by a pattern Weare, B.C., 1992: A comparison of the ISCCP Cl cloud recognition technique. J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol, 2, 314amounts with those derived from high resolution AVHRR 330. images. Int. J. Remote Sens., 13, 1,965-1,980. Wyatt, C.L., 1978: Radiometric Calibration: Theory and Meth- Weinreb, M.P., G. Hamilton, S. Brown, and R.J. Koczor, 1990: ods. Academic Press, 200pp. Nonlinear corrections in calibration of Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer infrared channels. J. Geophys. -X, Y- Res., 95, 7,381-7,388.' Experimental data on spec- Yamanouchi, T., and S. Kawaguchi, 1992: Cloud distribution Weller, M. and U. Leiterer, 1988: and its global distribution. in the Antarctic from AVHRR data and radiation meatral aerosol optical thickness Beitr. Phys. Atmosph'., 61, 1-9. Wertz, J.R. (Ed.), 1978: Spacecraft Attitude Determination and Control. D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland, 858pp. surements at the surface. Int. J. Remote Sens., 13, 111- 127. Yentsch, C.S., 1983: Remote Sensing of Biological Substances. Remote Sensing Applications in Marine Science and Tech- Williams, S.P., E.F. Szajna, and W.A. Hovis, 1985a: Nimbus 7 nology, A.P. Cracknell, Ed., D. Reidel Publishing Co., 263- Coastal Zone Color Scanner (CZCS) Level 1 Data Product 297. Users' Guide. NASA Tech. Memo. 86203, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 49pp. , and D.W. Menzel, 1963: A method for the determination of phytoplankton, chlorophyll, and phaeophytin by fluoresand -, 1985b: Nimbus 7 Coastal Zone Color cence. Deep-Sea Res., 10, 221-231. Scanner (CZCS), Level 2 Data Product Users' Guide. NASA Tech. Memo. 86202, NASA Goddard Space Flight , and D.A. Phinney, 1985: Rotary motion and convection Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 57pp. Wilson, W.H., R.C. Smith, and J.W. Nolten, 1981: The CZCS as a means of regulating primary production in warm core rings. J. Geophys. Res., 90, 3,237-3,248. SIO Ref. 81-32, Scripps Inst. of Yoder, J.A., C.R. McClain, J.O. Blanton, and L.-Y. Oey, 1987: Geolocation Algorithms. Oceanogr., La Jolla, California, 37pp. Spatial scales in CZCS-chlorophyll imagery of the southeastern U.S.continental shelf. Limnol. Oceanogr., 32, 929- Woodruff, S.D., R.J. Slutz, R.L. Jenne, and P.M. Steurer, 1987: 941. A comprehensive ocean-atmosphere data set. Bull. Am. Meteor. Soc., 68, 1,239-1,250. Woodward, R.H., J. Firestone, and C.R. McClain, 1992: Prog- -Zress report on AVHRR/Pathfinder activities. Internal doc- Zalewski, E.F., and C.R. Duda, 1983: Silicon photodiode device ument submitted to Pathfinder Project, NASA Goddard with 100% external quantum efficiency. Appl. Opt., 22, Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 14pp. 34 2,867-2,873.

Original page 38

E.R. Firestone and S.B. Hooker THE SEAWiFS TECHNICAL REPORT SERIES Vol. 10 Woodward, R.H., R.A. Barnes, C.R. McClain, W.E. Esaias, Vol. l Hooker, S.B., W.E. Esaias, G.C. Feldman, W.W. Gregg, and C.R. McClain, 1992: An Overview of SeaWiFS and Ocean Color. NASA Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol. 1, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight W.L. Barnes, and A.T. Mecherikunnel, 1993: Modeling of the SeaWiFS Solar and Lunar Observations. NASA Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol. 10, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 26pp. Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 24pp., plus color plates. Vol. 11 Vol. 2 Patt, F.S., C.M. Hoisington, W.W. Gregg, and P.L. Coronado, Gregg, W.W., 1992: Analysis of Orbit Selection for SeaWiFS: Ascending vs. Descending Node. NASA Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol. 2, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 16pp. Vol. 12 1993: Analysis of Selected Orbit Propagation Models for the SeaWiFS Mission. NASA Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol. 11, S.B. Hooker, E.R. Firestone, and A.W. Indest, Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 16pp. Vol. 3 Firestone, E.R., and S.B. Hooker, 1993: SeaWiFS Technical Re- McClain, C.R., W.E. Esaias, W. Barnes, B. Guenther, D. Endres, S. Hooker, G. Mitchell, and R. Barnes, 1992: Calibration and Validation Plan for SeaWiFS. NASA Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol. 3, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, port Series Summary Index: Volumes 1-11. NASA Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol. 12, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 28pp. Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Vol. 13 Eds., NASA Goddard Maryland, 41 pp. McClain, C.R., K.R. Arrigo, J. Comiso, R. Fraser, M. Darzi, Vol. 4 McClain, C.R., E. Yeh, and G. Fu, 1992: An Analysis of GAC Sampling Algorithms: A Case Study. NASA Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol. 4, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Mary- J.K. Firestone, B. Schieber, E-n. Yeh, and C.W. Sullivan, 1994: Case Studies for SeaWiFS Calibration and Validation, Part 1. NASA Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol. 13, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 52pp., plus color plates. land, 22pp., plus color plates. Vol. 14 Vol. 5 Mueller, J.L., 1993: The First SeaWiFS Intercalibration Round- Mueller, J.L., and R.W. Austin, 1992: Ocean Optics Protocols. NASA Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol. 5, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 43pp. Vol. 15 Robin Experiment, SIRREX-1, July 1992. NASA Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol. 14, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 60pp. Vol. 6 Gregg, W.W., F.S. Patt, R.H. Woodward, 1994: The Simu- Firestone, E.R., and S.B. Hooker, 1992: SeaWiFS Technical Report Series Summary Index: Volumes 1-5. NASA Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol. 6, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 9pp. lated SeaWiFS Data Set, Version 2. NASA Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol. 15, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 42pp., plus color plates. Vol. 16 Vol. 7 Mueller, J.L., B.C. Johnson, C.L. Cromer, J.W. Cooper, J.T. Darzi, M., 1992: Cloud Screening for Polar Orbiting Visible and IR Satellite Sensors. NASA Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol. 7, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 7pp. McLean, S.B. Hooker, and T.L. Westphal, 1994: The Second SeaWiFS Intercalibration Round-Robin Experiment, SIRREX-2, June 1993. NASA Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol. 16, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 121pp. Vol. 8 Vol. 17 Hooker, S.B., W.E. Esaias, and L.A. Rexrode, 1993: Proceed- Abbott, M.R., O.B. Brown, H.R. Gordon, K.L. Carder, R.E. ings of the First SeaWiFS Science Team Meeting. NASA Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol. 8, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 61 pp. Evans, F.E. Muller-Karger, and W.E. Esaias, 1994: Ocean color in the 21st century: a strategy for a 20-year time series. NASA Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol. 17, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 20pp. Vol. 9 Vol. 18 Gregg, W.W., F.C. Chen, A.L. Mezaache, J.D. Chen, J.A. Firestone, E.R., and S.B. Hooker, 1995: SeaWiFS Technical Re- Whiting, 1993: The Simulated SeaWiFS Data Set, Version 1. NASA Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol. 9, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, and A.W. Indest, Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 17pp. port Series Summary Index: Volumes 1-17. NASA Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol. 18, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 46 pages. 35

Original page 39

SeaWiFS Technical Report Series Cumulative Index: Volumes 1-23 Vol. 19 Vol. 22 McClain, C.R., R.S. Fraser, J.T. McLean, M. Darzi, J.K. Fire- Barnes, R.A., W.L. Barnes, W.E. Esaias, and C.R. McClain, Yeh, 1994: Prelaunch Acceptance Report for the SeaWiFS Rastone, F.S. Patt, B.D. Schieber, R.H. Woodward, E-n. S. Mattoo, S.F. Biggar, P.N. Slater, K.J. Thome, A.W. diometer. NASA Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol.22, S.B.Hook- Holmes, R.A. Barnes, and K.J. Voss, 1994: Case Studies er, E.R. Firestone, and J.G. Acker, Eds., NASA Goddard for SeaWiFS Calibration and Validation, Part 2. NASA Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 32pp. Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol.19, S.B. Hooker, E.R. Firestone, and J.G. Acker, Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 73pp. Vol. 20 Hooker, S.B., C R McClain, J.K. Firestone, T.L. Westphal, E-n. Yen, and Y. Ge, 1994: The SeaWiFS Bio-Optical Archive and Storage System (SeaBASS), Part 1. NASA Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol. 20, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 40pp. Vol. 21 Vol. 23 Barnes, R.A., A.W. Holmes, W.L. Barnes, W.E. Esaias, C.R. McClain, and T. Svitek, 1994: SeaWiFS Prelaunch Radiometric Calibration and Spectral Characterization. NASA Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol.23, S.B. Hooker, E.R. Firestone, and J.G. Acker, Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 55pp. Vol. 24 Acker, J.G., 1994: The Heritage of SeaWiFS: A Retrospec- Firestone, E.R., and S.B. Hooker, 1995: SeaWiFS Technical Retive on the CZCS NIMBUS Experiment Team (NET) Pro- port Series Summary Index: Volumes 1-23. NASA Tech. gram. NASA Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol. 21, S.B. Hooker Memo. 104566, Vol. 24, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, and E.R. Firestone, Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 43pp. 36 Maryland, 36pp.

Original page 40

Form Approved REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services. Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget. Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USEONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE June 1995 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE SeaWiFS Technical Report Series 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED Technical Memorandum 5. FUNDING NUMBERS Volume 24-SeaWiFS Technical Report Series Cumulative Index: Volumes 1-23 Code 970.2 6. AUTHOR(S) Elaine R. Firestone and Stanford B. Hooker Series Editors: Stanford B. Hooker and Elaine R. Firestone 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) Laboratory for Hydrospheric Processes Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, Maryland 20771 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 95B00092 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING National Aeronautics and Space Administration Washington, D.C. 20546-0001 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES AGENCY REPORT NUMBER TM-104566, Vol. 24 Elaine R. Firestone: General Sciences Corporation, Laurel, Maryland 12a. DISTRIBUnON/AVAILABILrrY STATEMENT Unclassified-Unlimited Subject Category 48 12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE Report is available from the Center for AeroSpace Information (CASI), 800 Elkridge Landing Road, LinthicumHeights, MD 21090; (301)621-0390 13. ABSTRACT (Maximum 200 words) The Sea-viewing Wide Field-of-view Sensor (SeaWiFS) is the follow-on ocean color instrument to the Coastal Zone Color Scanner (CZCS), which ceased operations in 1986, after an eight-year mission. SeaWiFS is expected to be launched in 1995, on the SeaStar satellite, being built by Orbital Sciences Corporation (OSC). The SeaWiFS Project at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's(NASA) Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC), has undertakenthe responsibility of documenting all aspects of this mission, which is critical to the ocean color and marine science communities.This documentation, entitled the SeaWiFS Technical Report Series, is in the form of NASA Technical Memorandum Number 104566. All reports published are volumes within the series. This particular volume serves as a reference, or guidebook, to the previous 23 volumes and consists of 6 sections including:an errata, an addendum (summaries of various SeaWiFS Working Group Bio-optical Algorithm and Protocols Subgroups Workshops, and other auxiliary information), an index to key words and phrases, a list of all references cited, and lists of acronyms and symbols used. It is the editors' intention to publish a cumulative index of this type after every five volumes in the series. Each index covers the topics published in all previouseditions, that is, each new index will include all of the information contained in the preceeding indices. 14. SUBJECT TERMS 15. NUMBER OF PAGES Index, Summary, Overview, Errata,Addendum, 36 SeaWiFS, Oceanography, Cumulative, Glossary, Symbols, References, Bio-optical, Algorithm Workshop, Protocols Subgroup 16. PRICE CODE Workshop 17. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 18. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF REPORT OF THIS PAGE Unclassified Unclassified NSN 7540-01 -280-5500 19. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 20. LIMITATION OFABSTRACT OF ABSTRACT Unclassified Unlimited Standard Form 298 (Rev. 2-89)

Original page 41

National Aeronautics and Space Administration Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, Maryland 20771 Official Business Penalty for Private Use, $300 SPECIAL FOURTH-CLASS RATE POSTAGE & FEES PAID NASA PERMIT No. G27 POSTMASTER: If Undeliverabte (Section 158, Postal Manual) Do Not Return