Provenance

Source & edition record

This page records where the text came from, what changed in presentation, and what remains unverified.

Bibliographic source

Work
Knowledge by Acquaintance and Knowledge by Description
Author
Bertrand Russell
First publication
Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 1911, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 108-128. DOI: 10.1093/aristotelian/11.1.108
Source edition
Mysticism and Logic and Other Essays, London: George Allen & Unwin, 1959, pp. 209-232
Web source
https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/25447/pg25447-images.html#X
Accessed
2026-08-16
Verification
source-compared
Source snapshot SHA-256
3644c1c3c8d2cb996a72caffbcb9513e2229de66856fe7394544051c98506a29

Transformations

  • Removed the Project Gutenberg legal wrapper and the work-specific excluded matter recorded in the source manifest.
  • Preserved source wording, spelling, punctuation, order, and plain-text emphasis markers.
  • Normalised mechanical whitespace and line wrapping, while preserving diagrams and tables verbatim.
  • Added semantic section files, stable routes, source-fragment links, and deterministic anchors.
  • Inherited the Project Gutenberg transcription and its documented editorial corrections.
  • Converted bracket-number note markers and definitions into stable section-local Markdown footnotes.
  • Compared the complete chapter against the exact 1911 first-publication scan; retained the frozen 1959 source-edition wording and recorded substantive earlier readings in the public source record.
  • Mapped all thirty stable paragraph anchors to the approved 1911 first-publication pages 108-128 while continuing to identify the rendered wording as the 1959 source edition.

Edition collation

The rendered text follows the frozen 1959 source edition. The exact 1911 first publication was compared in full; genuine earlier readings and two explicitly dated 1917 additions are disclosed here rather than silently merged.

Witnesses

Substantive earlier readings

LocationEarlier witnessRendered source edition
1911 p. 109in speaking of presentationsin speaking of presentation
1911 p. 110It is, however, very difficult to account for plain factsIt is difficult, but probably not impossible, to account for plain facts
1911 p. 110It would seem necessary ... to suppose that I am acquainted with myselfIt would seem necessary ... either to suppose that I am acquainted with myself ... or to find some other analysis of self-consciousness
1911 p. 111we have also what may be called awareness of universalswe have also (though not quite in the same sense) what may be called awareness of universals
1911 p. 112There are thus two sorts of objectsThere are thus at least two sorts of objects
1911 p. 112the disjunction 'universal-particular' is exhaustivethe disjunction 'universal-particular' includes all objects
1911 p. 114an object which is the so-and-soan object which we know to be the so-and-so
1911 p. 117The relation love enters as one of the terms of the relation, not as a relating relation.Sentence omitted
1911 p. 117 notePhilosophical Essays, 'The Nature of Truth.'The note adds Russell's Wittgenstein-driven qualification, dated [1917].
After 1911 p. 121No note after 'I' and 'this'A new note excludes 'I' and retains only 'this' as a strict proper name, dated [1917].
1911 p. 126Scott, in the same sense in which 'author' means a certain universalScott, in the same sense (so far as concerns our present discussion) in which 'author' means a certain universal
1911 p. 126some value of x makes it truesome value of x makes it true, but no other value does
1911 p. 128consists of a complex whose constituents are a mindconsists of an occurrence whose constituents are a mind
1911 p. 128identity of denotation with diversity of connotationidentity of denotation with diversity of meaning

Original-page mapping

Paragraph anchors were reconciled to the following scans. The source text remains the frozen edition identified above.

Reviewed by OpenAI Codex for Web Editions on 2026-08-16.

Rights status

public-domain. Project Gutenberg records the source edition as public domain in the USA. The article was first published in 1911. This publication decision applies to US availability; readers elsewhere should check local law. Project Gutenberg's licence and trademark terms apply to the frozen source artifact. View the rights record ↗

Return to the work