Section 2 of 5
Materials and Methods
Adriana Cotta Cardoso Reis, Camila Portruneli, Lívia da Cunha Agostini, Camila Rezende Minelli, Luana Neves Dias, Adalberto José de Lima, Breno de Mello Silva, Cíntia Lopes de Brito Magalhães, Glenda Nicioli da Silva, Guilherme Rocha Pereira, and Geraldo Célio Brandão · about 4 minutes
Chemicals and Synthesis of Compounds
All reagents and solvents were of analytical grade and used without further purification unless otherwise stated. The 4-amino-7-chloroquinoline derivatives were synthesized through a three-step synthetic route. Structural characterization of the compounds was performed by 1H and 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS). Detailed synthetic procedures and spectral data are provided in the Supplementary Information. The synthetic route is summarized in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1: Synthetic route scheme of the 4-amino-7-chloroquinoline derivatives
Cell Lines and Viruses
Vero cells (ATCC CCL-81) were maintained in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM, high glucose) supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and antibiotics under standard conditions (37 °C, 5% CO₂). The mosquito-derived C6/36 cell line was cultured in Leibovitz’s L-15 medium supplemented with 5% FBS.
Zika virus (ZIKV, strain PE243/2015) was propagated in C6/36 cells. Chikungunya virus (CHIKV, strain 27-African) and Mayaro virus (MAYV, strain Acre27) were propagated in Vero cells. Viral stocks were obtained from infected cell culture supernatants, clarified by centrifugation, aliquoted, and stored at − 80 °C. Viral titers were determined prior to use.
Cytotoxicity Assay
Cell viability was evaluated using the MTT assay. Vero cells (1 × 10⁴ cells/well) were seeded in 96-well plates and incubated with serial dilutions of the synthesized compounds (0.78–100 µg mL⁻¹) prepared in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). After incubation, MTT reagent was added and absorbance was measured spectrophotometrically. The median cytotoxic concentration (CC₅₀) was determined from dose response curves [10, 11].
In Vitro Antiviral Assay
Antiviral activity was assessed using an MTT-based assay in Vero cells (1 × 10⁴ cells/well) infected with CHIKV, ZIKV, or MAYV at defined viral titers. Cells were treated with non-cytotoxic concentrations of the compounds [12, 13]. The median effective concentration (EC₅₀), defined as the concentration required to protect 50% of infected cells from virus-induced cytopathic effects, was calculated [14]. The selectivity index (SI) was determined as the ratio CC₅₀/EC₅₀. Amantadine and chloroquine were used as positive controls for CHIKV, while ribavirin was used for ZIKV and MAYV [15].
Virucidal Assay
The virucidal activity of the most active compound was evaluated by pre-incubating the compound (6 µM) with CHIKV prior to infection. After incubation, residual infectivity was determined using a plaque reduction assay, and viral titers were expressed as plaque forming units per milliliter (PFU mL⁻¹) [15–17].
Inhibitory Cytopathic Effect Assay
The inhibitory effect on virus induced cytopathic effects (CPE) was assessed in Vero cells (1 × 10⁶ cells/well) seeded in 6-well plates. Cells were infected with CHIKV (MOI = 1) and treated with the selected compound (6 µM). After 48 h, cell monolayers were examined microscopically to evaluate morphological changes [18]. Supernatants were collected for viral titration by plaque assay.
Viral Load Quantification by RT-qPCR
Viral RNA was extracted from supernatants using a commercial extraction kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized using a reverse transcription kit. Quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) was performed using SYBR Green chemistry to determine viral RNA levels at 24, 36, and 48 h post-infection.
Relative viral quantification was based on standard curves generated from serial dilutions of known viral titers. Results were expressed as log₁₀ PFU mL⁻¹ equivalents.
Viral RNA Extraction
Viral RNA was extracted using the Bio Gene Viral DNA/RNA Extraction kit (Bioclin/Quibasa) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The quality and quantity of the extracted RNA were assessed by measuring the A₂₆₀/₂₈₀ and A₂₆₀/₂₃₀ ratios, as well as the concentration (ng µL⁻¹), using a NanoDrop™ Lite Plus spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher), according to Loaiza-Cano et al. with modifications [19].
cDNA Synthesis
Complementary DNA (cDNA) was obtained from the High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) according to Monsalve-Escudero et al. and Souza et al., with modifications [20, 21]. The amplification program consisted of a cycle of 25 °C for 10 min, 37 °C for 120 min, 85 °C for 5 min and holding at 4 °C, following the manufacturer’s recommendations.
RT-qPCR
For the relative quantification of CHIKV viral RNA, quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) was performed using GoTaq® qPCR Master Mix kit (Promega) containing SYBR™ Green, according to Cuellar-Quimbaya et al., with modifications [22]. To estimate the relative concentration of viral genetic material, serial dilutions with a dilution factor of 1:10 were performed. Six points were generated in duplicates on the standard curve with 1 × 10⁹, 1 × 10⁸, 1 × 10⁷, 1 × 10⁶, 1 × 10⁵, and 1 × 10⁴ PFU mL⁻¹ equivalents. The primer sequences for CHIKVF were 5’-GACAATGCGCGCGGTACC-3’ and CHIKVR were 5’-TGTTGTTTTGTGGCGCCT-3’40. The amplification program consisted of a 95 °C hold cycle for 2 min and 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s, 51 °C for 15 s, and 72 °C for 1 min. The melting curve was standardized at 95 °C for 15 s, 60 °C for 1 min, 95 °C for 30 s (dissociation), and 60 °C for 15 s.
The relative quantification of the viral load in the sample was performed by analyzing the quantification cycle (Cq). The Cq value was inserted into a straight-line equation constructed from a standard curve generated with known concentrations of the CHIKV genome (converted to Log₁₀ PFU mL⁻¹). Subsequently, the result was compared to the log₁₀ PFU mL⁻¹ values of the virus control samples (VC), allowing the determination of the relative viral load of CHIKV [22–24].
Statistical Analysis
All experiments were performed in at least duplicate or triplicate. Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical analyses were conducted using Student’s t-test, and differences were considered statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05.