Work overview

Section 03 of 09

Results

Effects of Perovskia abrotanoides Kar. Essential Oil on Greenhouse Gas Mitigation and Energy Efficiency Improvement in Sheep Rumen: An In Vitro Study

Mohsen Kazemi · 2026

Contents

Section 03 of 09

  1. 01Introduction
  2. 02Materials and Methods
  3. 03Results
  4. 04Discussion
  5. 05Conclusion
  6. 06Author Contributions
  7. 07Funding
  8. 08Ethics Statement
  9. 09Conflicts of Interest
Text size
Work overview

Section 3 of 9

Results

Mohsen Kazemi · about 6 minutes

Chemical Composition of Essential Oil

A total of 33 compounds were identified in the essential oil of P. abrotanoides, representing 99.4% of the total oil composition (Table 2). The essential oil yield was 1.5% (w/w) based on dry plant weight. The oil was dominated by oxygenated monoterpenes, with 1,8‐cineole (16.10%) and camphor (13.80%) accounting for nearly 30% of the total essential oil composition, followed by α‐pinene (8.40%), δ‐3‐carene (6.81%), n‐pentadecane (5.51%), (E)‐caryophyllene (4.21%) and α‐humulene (4.12%). The remaining constituents were present at concentrations below 4%.

No. | Chemical constituent | Amount (% W/W) | Retention index (RI)
1 | α‐Thujene | 0.40 | 924
2 | α‐Pinene | 8.4 | 932
3 | Camphene | 3.11 | 946
4 | Sabinene | 0.80 | 969
5 | β‐Pinene | 2.50 | 974
6 | Myrcene | 2.21 | 990
7 | δ‐3‐Carene | 6.81 | 1009
8 | α‐Terpinene | 1.30 | 1016
9 | p‐Cymene | 1.19 | 1024
10 | 1,8‐Cineole | 16.1 | 1031
11 | α‐Terpinolene | 2.12 | 1085
12 | Linalool | 2.53 | 1095
13 | Camphor | 13.8 | 1141
14 | α‐Terpineol | 2.81 | 1188
15 | Trans‐carveol | 2.52 | 1217
16 | Cis‐carveol | 0.40 | 1229
17 | Linalool acetate | 0.11 | 1257
18 | Bornyl acetate | 2.83 | 1285
19 | Carvacrol | 0.12 | 1300
20 | Methyl decanoate | 1.12 | 1321
21 | α‐Cubebene | 1.31 | 1371
22 | α‐Gurjunene | 0.34 | 1410
23 | (E)‐Caryophyllene | 4.21 | 1421
24 | α‐Humulene | 4.12 | 1455
25 | α‐Amorphene | 2.13 | 1481
26 | N‐pentadecane | 5.51 | 1500
27 | β‐Bisabolene | 0.21 | 1507
28 | γ‐Cadinene | 0.71 | 1514
29 | δ‐Cadinene | 2.51 | 1524
30 | Caryophyllene oxide | 0.45 | 1582
31 | β‐Cedrene epoxide | 1.51 | 1611
32 | Epi‐α‐cadinol | 2.23 | 1642
33 | (E,Z)‐farnesol | 2.01 | 1742

Gas Production Parameters and Methane Yield

Increasing levels of P. abrotanoides essential oil significantly reduced methane production by 57.5%, decreasing from 15.00 mL in the control treatment to 6.37 mL at 500 mg/L (linear effect, p < 0.0001) (Table 3). Likewise, gas production potential declined by 44.7%, whereas cumulative gas production after 24, 48, 72 and 96 h decreased by 47.9%, 47.0%, 43.7% and 44.2%, respectively, with increasing essential oil concentration (all linear effects, p < 0.0001). The fractional rate of gas production was also affected by treatment, with the lowest value observed at 500 mg/L (0.0848 h−1), corresponding to a 12.5% reduction compared with the control (cubic and quartic effects, p = 0.03). Significant quadratic responses were observed for gas production potential and cumulative gas production parameters (p = 0.0012–0.0030), whereas quartic effects were not significant.

Essential oil level (mg/L) | Methane1 (mL) | Fractional rate of gas production (h−1) | Gas production potential (mL) | 24‐h gas production (mL) | 48‐h gas production (mL) | 72‐h gas production (mL) | 96‐h gas production (mL)
0 (control) | 15.00a | 0.0969a | 72.23a | 59.32a | 69.80a | 74.17a | 74.95a
100 | 13.22b | 0.0920b | 61.34b | 49.83b | 59.18b | 62.95b | 63.33b
200 | 11.35c | 0.0993a | 56.08c | 46.00c | 54.22c | 57.87c | 58.32c
300 | 9.70d | 0.0978a | 50.08d | 40.35d | 48.27d | 51.97d | 52.22d
400 | 7.57e | 0.0965ab | 44.29e | 35.97e | 42.47e | 45.75e | 46.27e
500 | 6.37e | 0.0848c | 39.92f | 30.89f | 36.99f | 41.74f | 41.83f
SEM | 0.44 | 0.0012 | 2.26 | 0.66 | 0.64 | 0.69 | 0.70
p value
Linear | <0.0001 | 0.34 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001
Quadratic | 0.77 | 0.81 | 0.0012 | 0.003 | 0.002 | 0.0023 | 0.0010
Cubic | 0.79 | 0.03 | 0.0176 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.0084 | 0.0090
Quartic | 0.78 | 0.03 | 0.20 | 0.07 | 0.16 | 0.21 | 0.14

Protozoa Population and Fermentation Parameters

Increasing supplementation levels of P. abrotanoides essential oil resulted in a 33.8% reduction in total protozoal population, decreasing from 5.17 × 105 to 3.42 × 105 cells/mL (linear effect, p < 0.0001) (Table 4). Total VFA concentration decreased by 17.4%, whereas NH3–N concentration decreased by 29.4% relative to the control treatment (linear effect, p < 0.0001). In contrast, ruminal pH increased from 6.63 to 6.85, representing an increase of approximately 3.3%. No significant quadratic, cubic or quartic responses were detected for these variables (p > 0.05).

Essential oil level (mg/L) | Total protozoa (×105 cells/mL) | Total volatile fatty acid concentration (mmol/L) | NH3–N concentration (mg/dL) | pH
0 (control) | 5.17a | 96.00a | 24.25a | 6.63d
100 | 4.95a | 92.75a | 23.27a | 6.65cd
200 | 4.52b | 89.12b | 21.87b | 6.69c
300 | 4.22b | 85.62c | 19.75c | 6.77b
400 | 3.87c | 82.25cd | 18.62c | 6.80b
500 | 3.42d | 79.25d | 17.12d | 6.85a
SEM | 0.13 | 1.28 | 0.55 | 0.02
p value
Linear | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001
Quadratic | 0.76 | 0.98 | 0.54 | 0.34
Cubic | 0.66 | 0.89 | 0.31 | 0.28
Quartic | 0.58 | 0.96 | 0.58 | 0.39

Nutrient Degradability and Microbial Efficiency Indices

Supplementation with P. abrotanoides essential oil markedly improved microbial efficiency indices (Table 5). Microbial biomass production increased by 45.1%, microbial synthesis efficiency increased by 79.6% and PF increased by 55.3% compared with the control treatment (all linear effects, p < 0.0001). Conversely, NDF degradability, OM degradability and DM degradability decreased by 19.4%, 14.0% and 11.9%, respectively, as essential oil concentration increased. A significant quadratic effect was observed only for DM degradability (p = 0.025), whereas no other quadratic, cubic or quartic effects were detected (p > 0.05).

Essential oil level (mg/L) | Microbial biomass production (mg) | Microbial biomass synthesis efficiency (%) | Partitioning factor (mg truly degraded organic matter/mL gas produced) | Neutral detergent fibre degradability (%) | Organic matter degradability (%) | Dry matter degradability (%)
0 (control) | 58.32d | 30.87f | 3.18e | 50.25a | 75.01a | 73.75a
100 | 63.46c | 36.67e | 3.47d | 48.50a | 73.01ab | 71.25b
200 | 66.88c | 39.80d | 3.65d | 46.50b | 70.50b | 67.50c
300 | 75.06b | 45.81c | 4.06c | 44.75b | 67.50c | 67.25cd
400 | 76.44b | 49.09b | 4.33b | 42.50c | 67.25c | 66.50cd
500 | 84.63a | 55.46a | 4.94a | 40.50d | 64.50c | 65.00d
SEM | 1.93 | 1.72 | 0.12 | 0.74 | 0.83 | 0.68
p value
Linear | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001
Quadratic | 0.65 | 0.48 | 0.47 | 0.76 | 0.42 | 0.025
Cubic | 0.34 | 0.98 | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.31 | 0.76
Quartic | 0.20 | 0.11 | 0.24 | 0.82 | 0.70 | 0.19