Work overview

Section 05 of 10

Conclusion

Comparative evaluation of upper airway dimensions following isolated mandibular setback versus bimaxillary surgery in the surgery-first approach: A 1-year follow-up study

Le Tan Hung, Pham Trinh Quoc Khanh, Le Duc Lanh, Tran Ai Khiem, Nguyen My Huyen, and Nguyen Trung Hieu · 2026

Contents

Section 05 of 10

  1. 01Introduction
  2. 02Materials and methods
  3. 03Results
  4. 04Discussion
  5. 05Conclusion
  6. 06Sources of support in the form of grants
  7. 07Ethical approval
  8. 08Funding
  9. 09Patient consent
  10. 10Declaration of competing interest
Text size
Work overview

Section 5 of 10

Conclusion

Le Tan Hung, Pham Trinh Quoc Khanh, Le Duc Lanh, Tran Ai Khiem, Nguyen My Huyen, and Nguyen Trung Hieu · about 1 minutes

Performing an isolated mandibular setback under the SFA induces considerable upper airway constriction, whereas bimaxillary orthognathic surgery significantly preserves airway dimensions. Bimaxillary intervention should therefore be considered a safer surgical indication to proactively mitigate the risk of respiratory impairment, particularly in Class III patients requiring substantial mandibular retropositioning. This study provides new evidence that bimaxillary surgery better preserves airway dimensions under the SFA compared with isolated mandibular setback.